This coming from partner of the team who helped Erika stage a post a photo op over Charlie's body in his casket. ๐คฆโโ๏ธ.
So let me get this straight, releasing old text messages (that you demanded she release) is a an evil thing and some things should remain private but posting his deceased body on Insta somehow does not meet that same threshold? ๐คทโโ๏ธ
Do yourself a favor Andrew, just keep your ignorant mouth shut. You make it worse for yourself every time you do this.
Yes, I've seen the alleged texts shared by Candace. I have no idea about their authenticity. For argument's sake, let's assume they're real. Here are my observations:
It can be an evil thing to release a man's private messages after his death. Not everything is meant to be public. I can understand certain things in certain contexts, but Candace is weaponizing these messages to diminish Charlie's public statements and advance her own agenda - and he's not here to defend himself.
Also, consider the moment in time. Charlie had been unfairly called an anti-Semite in 2023, he was understandably upset by that, and he was willing to believe Candace was facing a similarly unfair attack. Heโs clearly trying to support someone who he thinks is being taken advantage of. It's important to remember that in 2023, Candace had yet to go off the deep end with her jihad against the Jews. We didn't yet know how far she was going to take it. Our relationship with DW had sometimes been rocky over the years, but these texts would be from before things improved significantly in 2024 during Trump's re-election and victory (which is why Ben spoke at AmFest in '24 and '25 at Charlie's invitation). Did disagreements remain? Of course. But at the time of these texts, Charlie was not yet in regular communication with Ben and Jeremy, and he was only hearing Candace's version of events.
But publishing what she claims are private messages is illustrative of her character, and there's an important story that explains how CK became very aware of this.
In the first few months of Trump's second term, Emmanuel Macron visited DC and met with the president. Afterward, the president spoke with Charlie to see if Candace would be willing to stop attacking Macron's wife. This was a private matter and Charlie handled it with the utmost discretion. Candace did not. Despite the sensitive nature, Candace soon shared the story of the president calling her on her podcast.
Why am I telling you this?
Because when Charlie found out that Candace was willing to share the president's private communications on her show - just like she's apparently willing to share Charlie's private messages now - he was angry. She had betrayed the president's confidence, which Charlie believed was sacrosanct. After that, he told me Candace was officially a lost cause and no one could ever trust her again. Breaching peopleโs trust in such a public and calloused way isnโt normal behavior, and to him, she had "crossed he Rubicon."
This is why I'm very aware that Charlie and Candace were not friends when he was killed. He was still managing the relationship so she wouldn't turn on the org, but this pattern of hers playing out now is why Charlie ultimately realized he could never trust her again.
MIC DROP!๐ค
Elon: โThe fact, as you pointed out, is that a quarter billion people follow me. I think a lot more people actually like me than donโt, and I think a lot more people hate you and the media more than you realize.โ
Never seen more evidence against someone than Iโve seen against Tyler Robinson. DNA, fingerprints, eyewitnesses, surveillance, ballistics, cell phone data, testimony from his closest family & friends, itโs all there
๐จ BREAKING: Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine is facing mass outrage nationwide for VETOING legislation that would require photo ID to vote by mail
UNREAL!! How can a REPUBLICAN governor oppose this?
DeWine says it's a "burden" ๐คฏ
Every state needs to fortify their elections, STOP obstructing!
@Buzz_808@greta I figured I would keep this conversation at a level you could understand and not overwhelm you with being forced to take the time sound out your words.
The fact that you can take one short sentence stating that education doesnt equal intelligence and immediately determine not only my feelings on, but my knowledge of economics is exactly why it is impossible to have any rational discussion. You are not driven by truth, logic, or facts but by pure manufactured hatred so attempting any sort of discourse about the topic with you would be completely futile as you are only interested in attacking, not actual discussion.
Funny how you can not have reasonable discourse without immediately hurling insults at. both me and the President. You seem to have quite the obsession with him while I never once mentioned him in this thread nor did my original comment have anything to do with him. But your immediate go to is to attack a woman who simply pointed out that education doesn't equal intelligence and spew vitriolic lies about our President. Both glaring signs that you completely lack the mental and emotional maturity to have any kind of rational discussion. What's the matter, mommy didn't love you enough?