How innocent people act...
1. Destroy phones
2. Delete texts an emails
3. Lie to Feds and Grand Jury
4. Kill family Dog
5. Sell family home
6. Tell the man never went into house
7. Don't go outside with man dying on lawn
8. Play Victim
9. Place Blame
10. Help cops cover up crime
Dark Journalist Special X-Series Presentation:
JFK And The UFO File Secret Physics X-Protect & Lloyd Berkner! Featuring An Exclusive Interview With Dr. Joseph Farrell...
https://t.co/LHPP2V8V5G
Special Premiere At 8PM EST...
Nearly four years after the murders, a newly released trove of autopsy reports, toxicology findings and expert disclosures is helping fill in some of the remaining gaps about what happened inside the home that night https://t.co/1ADpIjqLvF π
@mmg19623@MariaDeAngelo9 I've always believe WSU Kim too, as well as Dave. I don't see a reason for either of them to lie. Both of them were also thoroughly vetted by multiple people, including the producers for the documentary they were in.
@Julez_TrueCrime@MariaDeAngelo9 I'm not saying the receipts don't say that. I'm showing the fake name used by Molly for her DoorDash driving account. The DoorDash account number here directly links to the DD # in the exhibit of the DoorDash record. Dalila is also the name that the cops refer to Molly as.
We've now got the 5th batch of Thomas Crooks records thanks to @JudicialWatch, and here's a juicy one: An unidentified subject in a grey shirt and fatigue-patterned pants w/ a "black camera bag" was seen entering the AGR building around 5 pm.
1st I've heard of this
π§΅
Exactly! He was also said in that police body cam of Molly's 12/30/23 traffic stop to be the cop's "Facebook girl" who was "slinging him meth" and who they made a CI for them. Just like Molly and Jimmy.
They all used Jimmy's white truck to do their drug dealing, including Janelle Braun.
@fromstacia@ConspiracyChxz Yes, I do remember! I had that saved in my notes, but I think they may have scrubbed the original video of him talking in an MSM interview. Jonathan Gilliam. Unless someone else can find it
He reiterates it here in this interview his suspicions of Steve:
https://t.co/Cf43lAxDpR
@LesleyMiss17638 Ok, speaking of nasty comments from the G's, check this one out. Just saw on Harsh's channel. "Listen here bitch"
Omg wtf!
And they're such liars! It was NOT debris, the FBI determined it was HAIR and tested it against Bryan's!
Yeah, it's pretty wild. I was just revisiting all these Molly videos the other day and went and looked him up again and saw he's now dead.
Doesn't say how he died. He was always in and out of jail and it's prolly likely an overdose, but I suspect they took him out.
I think there's much more to the Molly/Jimmy/Justin situation and connected to the murders in some way (more than just her being the DD driver). And people think Bryan looks suspicious??? Lmao.
No, you're not worth my time. You're a now known troll with a clear agenda to negate literally any opinion that falls outside the official narrative.
There's no intelligent discourse to be had here. You show up in these threads parroting "He's guilty. Case closed!!!" while dismissing anyone who questions the evidence, the investigation, or the State's claims.
This has nothing to do w/ TikTokers and Youtubers!
You aren't interested in discussion. You're interested in shutting down discussion. Every alternative viewpoint gets met with the same annoying reflexive response, regardless of the argument being made. And at that point, there's nothing to debate because you've already decided that anyone who disagrees with the official narrative must be wrong.
I'm interested in examining the facts, the inconsistencies, and the numerous unanswered questions. You're interested in policing what people are allowed to think.
Begone, troll!
You don't see glaring issues? Well then I think either you haven't read all the court documents, police reports, watched all the hearings, read and listened to expert testimonies, body cams, crime scene photos, etc. like the rest of us, or you're just not an intelligent person.
Why do you always show up in these threads the moment someone talks about anything contradictory to the official narrative?
Are you Steve G's sock account? Bill Thompson? Brett Payne? Jeff H? π€£
Yeah, good points. I still can't get past that there was no search warrant for the supposed OF. If Holland is using this fake profile as "proof" that Maddie had an OF account and claiming it to be true, that's a big problem. I will wait and see if other documents come out proving it to be true.
Yeah the bank account thing is interesting. Unless she was constantly opening new bank accounts and setting up direct deposit so she could get the new customer cash rewards (some banks offer hundreds of dollars to sign up).
But considering all the weirdness w/ Kaylee that we know at this point, I lean towards something else going on. There's something w/ the G family altogether that I'm very wary about, especially when it comes to their money situation. Steve claims to be a self-made millioniare on his LinkedIn - doing what? IT? Don't think so.
I think they're lying about not getting into Kaylee's phone and there's something on there that they can't have ppl finding out about.
@ConspiracyChxz FYI, here a link of JLR (not a fan of his, but he found the account in the beginning) showing the fake Maddie IG profile:
https://t.co/eHk2iWw3iH
I want to know where Holland got this info. It was written in the report in the book. But the IG account that he said was Maddie's that had the OF link in the bio was debunked years ago.
There was also no search warrant for any OF account. I wondered in the very beginning if any of these girls were on OF because they were all very pretty and they sometimes took provocative photos. But I've never seen proof. Also, their OF pics would have leaked ages ago.
I was amazed when Holland wrote that in his "report" - but he also wasn't hired on this case. After listening to him on Custody Queens the other night, I'm quite dubious of some of his claims.
Also, Chris Whitcomb erroneously wrote in the book that Holland was hired by the defense but according to his own words in this new interview, he was not.
Holland also had written in his "report" that Kaylee had drugs in her system, including Adderall, but that was not what was determined by the toxicology testing done in the report that just came out.
So I take what this guy says with a grain of salt.
With all of that said, I still wonder if any of the girls were involved in something outside of OF, maybe something similar...I've also wondered if there was trafficking going on at that school.