@Nico222North@firdel8000@nazzobetweeting Point being, l've seen hundreds of people calling the public sheep and npcs, all that lot.
All it does is isolate them, creating a feedback loop of their own opinions. In the worst cases, they stop caring about empathy. Do not let yourself go that far. It never ends well.
@Nico222North@firdel8000@nazzobetweeting So. Lemme get this straight.
If you fact check- you’re an npc.
Dude, I don’t use ai. I don’t even use google anymore. And, one more time, originality is a myth. You know your argument is also shared amongst plenty of people right? And they’re just as bad at fact checking.
@Nico222North@firdel8000@nazzobetweeting Dude. First of all, it’s red herring, second of all, you’ve been insulting people throughout this entire thread??
Cognitive dissonance is one thing, but truly I wonder how these conversations would go irl. Are you capable of having a conversation? Or is everything a fight?
@Nico222North@firdel8000@nazzobetweeting Originality is a myth. Thus, there comes a time where you must stop comparing yourself to other people, ranking yourself based on how “dissimilar” you are, and just… be a person. Do what you enjoy, and let others enjoy their things. It’s not difficult.
@Nico222North@firdel8000@nazzobetweeting lol you know it’s funnier because there are actually people who copy and paste tweets from chat gpt, but evidently you aren’t against ai since you used it as a source earlier.
Also, you know no thought is original right? Of course some things will be similar “narratives”.
@Nico222North@firdel8000@nazzobetweeting Broski incorporated, you know there’s a difference between saying “reasonable individual” (that which can be debated between all humans, because again, humans famously cannot agree on shit)
And point blank saying “100% of scientists (etc) believe in god” are very different right?
@Nico222North@firdel8000@nazzobetweeting I mean, seriously. That 100% argument falls apart with a simple google search.
https://t.co/bko09p6Ppk
Also: Charles Darwin was agnostic. Plenty of scientists were, concluding that there’s no viable way for us to prove right and wrong in religious matters until death.
@Nico222North@firdel8000@nazzobetweeting Love the doubling down! And the insults, woaw so smart!! lol. Also any reasonable individual would know using blanket statements such as “all who created (etc) had 100% belief in god” is a logical fallacy, humans famously can’t agree on shit.
@Nico222North@firdel8000@nazzobetweeting Are you really calling one of your fellow internet strangers an npc? For shame. You gotta respect other people as thinking individuals even if you don’t agree with em champ.
Also, hiding behind IQ scores and AI? Lmaooo be so fr dude.