KaySA

Pro-U.S. Constitution, Retired Soldier, God-fearing Patriot. God bless America!

[Bethany O’Leary 🇺🇸 🦅 @BethanyForTruth]

Democrats looked at the ENTIRE state of Texas… and decided James Talarico…vegan, low-T, kale-smoothie enthusiast, is their literal BEST shot at taking down Ken Paxton 😂💀

The audacity is Olympic level at this point.

Full roast video dropping now. Texas, y’all seeing this clown show too? 👀 repost if you’re locked in for Paxton in November. 🇺🇸 💪🏼

[A Man Of Memes @RickyDoggin]

The six New England states have 21 Congressional seats… and ZERO Republican Representatives.

Zero. Not one. Yet roughly 40% of the electorate in those states are registered Republicans — and in New Hampshire alone, it’s 48%.

How exactly does a party that claims to champion “democracy” deliver total one-party rule in an entire region where millions of voters clearly support the other side?

[C3 @C_3C_3]

ICE Deportations…

Clinton: 2 million with no riots.
GW Bush: 2 million with no riots.
Obama: 5 million with no riots.
Trump: 2 million with no riots.
Biden: 4 million with no riots.

Trump: 900K with riots, protests and Dem outrage.

Its all manufactured to stop Trump.

Facts.

[Apple Lamps @lamps_apple]

The Carroll case rested on a sequence of legal maneuvers with no precedent in American civil litigation. Democratic legislators passed a retroactive temporary law eliminating the statute of limitations for decades-old accusations that could not be dated, located, or defended with alibis. The day the temporary law took effect, Carroll filed her pre-prepared lawsuit, the first in the state to do so.

A Democratic mega-donor secretly funded the plaintiff’s legal costs through a nonprofit. The arrangement stayed hidden until one of Trump’s lawyers discovered it. A Clinton-appointed judge then sealed all records so the jury never learned the billionaire backer had publicly committed to Trump’s political destruction. Every participant in the legislative, funding, and judicial steps operated inside the same political network, and each decision produced the same cumulative result.

The jury explicitly checked “no” on the verdict form’s specific rape question. The judge ruled rape proven anyway, claiming the jury had used a common rather than statutory definition… an impossibility, since their rejection under the common definition precludes rape by any standard. Trump’s team was barred from arguing innocence before a second jury, which awarded $83.3 million ($65 million punitive) on the rape finding the first jury had rejected.

A defendant was sued for defamation over denying an accusation, prevented from asserting that denial as a defense, tried before a judge who concealed the plaintiff’s political funding, and hit with a nine-figure verdict built on facts the jury itself refused to find.

No comparable sequence exists in recorded U.S. civil litigation history.

[Baby News Network @BabyNetworkNews]

It lasted 11 seconds.. 😂

[KaySA @KaySuSA]

@AmericaPapaBear well...what about peacefully protesting by cutting the power to speakers?

[KaySA @KaySuSA]

@Supersonic_Red It called Word of Knowledge when the Holy Spirit reveals to someone personal things about another person that they would have no way of knowing. She probably also has the gift of healing. Did you notice pain disappear or anything get better after prayer?

[Wall Street Apes @WallStreetApes]

In the next 15 years, data centers are expected to add an additional $160 billion to grid costs in the US

Estimate say electricity rates for average households will spike by as much as 70%

Data centers are projected to triple their share of US electricity demand in the next few years

The main driver is the explosive growth of data centers built by Big Tech companies like Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Google, OpenAI and more to power artificial intelligence

Places like Northern Virginia already has over 200 data centers with massive new ones planned.

Utilities are striking secret proprietary deals with Big Tech companies. These are hidden behind NDAs that shift much of the infrastructure costs onto regular residential customers

Just in the PJM energy market of 13 states covering 65 million people, data centers were responsible for 63% of last year’s record 800% spike in capacity prices (This is INSANE)

Residential customers in places like Virginia and Louisiana are being forced to subsidize billions in new power plants and grid upgrades for data centers.

An Examples of this is in Louisiana, Meta’s data center deal leaves the public potentially on the hook for half or more of a $3–4 billion power plant

Again, without major policy changes, average household electricity bills could rise by up to 70% over the next 15 years due to data center demand.

There is only one real way we can stop this, we must create a separate customer class for data centers

Maryland and Oregon have already passed laws doing this

Forces data centers to pay for the specific infrastructure they need instead of spreading the costs to everyone else. More states need to do the same

Ban secret sweetheart deals

Require full public disclosure of all contracts between utilities and Big Tech

Prohibit deals where data centers pay below the actual cost of service

Make data centers pay the full cost of new power plants and grid upgrades

Change regulations so utilities cannot socialize the cost of data-center-driven infrastructure to residential and small business ratepayers

This needs to be done immediately

[Eric Daugherty @EricLDaugh]

🚨 UPDATE: President Trump drops EPIC rendition of the "Golden Dome for the WHITE HOUSE"

Make it happen! 🔥

[KaySA @KaySuSA]

@NEWSMAX Right, just like polls had Cornyn over Paxton to win. Get real!

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

BREAKING: Largest Human Cancer Study of Ivermectin + Mebendazole Is Now PEER-REVIEWED and PUBLISHED in a MAJOR Cancer Journal

84.4% of cancer patients taking ivermectin + mebendazole for 6 months declared either CANCER DISAPPEARANCE, TUMOR REGRESSION, or CANCER STABILIZATION.

Our study, “Real-world Clinical Outcomes of Ivermectin and Mebendazole in Cancer Patients: Results from a Prospective Observational Cohort,” is now peer-reviewed and published in Anticancer Research—a major international oncology journal of the International Institute of Anticancer Research (IIAR), established in 1995.

The results represent one of the most compelling clinical signals ever documented for repurposed anti-parasitic therapies in oncology.

A diverse population of cancer patients (n=197) was prescribed compounded ivermectin–mebendazole through a U.S. telemedicine platform, with each capsule containing 25 mg ivermectin and 250 mg mebendazole.

Participants were followed for approximately six months using standardized digital surveys assessing cancer outcomes, medication adherence, and tolerability.

At approximately six months post-treatment initiation, we observed an 84.4% Clinical Benefit Ratio (CBR)—meaning more than four out of five patients reported either:
No evidence of disease (32.8%)
Tumor regression (15.6%)
or Cancer stabilization (36.1%)

Importantly, adherence was remarkably high, with 86.9% completing the initial prescription and 66.4% remaining on therapy at six months.

Side effects were predominantly mild and manageable, reported in 25.4% of patients (primarily gastrointestinal), with 93.6% of those experiencing side effects continuing treatment after minor dosing adjustments.

This groundbreaking peer-reviewed publication was made possible through a unique collaboration between The Wellness Company, the McCullough Foundation, and the Chairman of the President’s Cancer Panel—uniting real-world clinical data, frontline medical experience, and epidemiologic expertise to evaluate inexpensive, repurposed therapies with major translational potential.

With these extraordinarily promising results, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials are now required.

In the meantime, many cancer patients are exercising their right to try.

@twc_health @McCulloughFund @IIAR_Journals @P_McCulloughMD @DrHarveyRisch @DrKellyVictory @jathorpmfm @drdrew @PeterGillooly @FosterCoulson

[Art @ZarkFiles]

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.

Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

[KaySA @KaySuSA]

@BasedMikeLee Absolutely not!

[KaySA @KaySuSA]

In case you're not aware:
Trump's New Bretton Woods: The Fed Fight Nobody's Talking About https://t.co/MBvlFXiaY0 via @YouTube

[KaySA @KaySuSA]

@EndWokeness Let someone try and take what little property she has and give it to someone else and let’s see how she feels about it then.

[KaySA @KaySuSA]

@ScottPresler @realjimten Congratulations 🎊
Thank you Scott!

[John Stossel @JohnStossel]

My government paid $2 million! for a bathroom in a park. Yet it’s often empty, and it’s already missing a sink.

By contrast, this public but PRIVATELY RUN park spent much less, while renovating a public toilet so well that people line up to use it.

[Vivid.🇮🇱 @VividProwess]

The amazing @lalshareef explains how Israel removed Jews from Gaza in 2005 to get peace, leaving behind greenhouses worth millions of dollars.

The Palestinians looted the greenhouses, and Gaza was turned into a terror fortress.

This must go viral.

[KaySA @KaySuSA]

Can you see the future? https://t.co/Mix7Ym65PB