![RobertMSterling's tweet photo. For anyone here who hasn’t worked in corporate strategy at a Fortune 500 company and wants to understand how utterly bone-headed decisions—such as changing your customers’ cell-phone plans unless they proactively call to opt out—get made, here’s a quick explainer 👇
This chain of events typically starts during a quarterly board of directors meeting, during which an independent director (generally a current or retired CEO of a company in a different, non-competing industry) says that the company isn’t making enough money and that it’s the fault of the CEO, who is a supremely unqualified buffoon.
(Tangent: Every board director has his own pet favorite metric, be it growth (e.g., year-over-year sales), profitability (e.g., EBITDA margin), investor returns (e.g., change in share price if public, return on invested capital if private), or some byzantine metric that he used to love when he was the division president of a Ma Bell carve-out back in the 1980s (e.g., change in same-store gross profit divided by number of people on the sales team, raised to the power of pi and divided by 1998, which represents the year his current girlfriend was born). The exact metric doesn’t matter; what matters is that, by the standards thereof, the CEO sucks.)
The independent director will then pull open the calculator app on his iPhone 7, punch some numbers in, and say something to the effect of, “If we can increase revenue per customer by just $5, our market cap will increase by billions. Get your strategy team to figure it out.”
From here, the CEO and the CFO will then set up a meeting with the SVP of corporate strategy for 7:15 AM the next morning, to be held in the locker room of the country-club whose $20k annual membership dues the company’s shareholders generously cover. Sitting in the sauna, buck naked save for bleached white towels barely sufficient for the mission to which they’ve been called, the executives will decide that the most prudent course of action is to call McKinsey and pay them approximately $2.5M to figure this out for them. (Note: The CFO will get a quote from his buddy at Deloitte or KPMG, just to be able to tell the board that they solicited competing bids, but everyone knows that the work is just going to end up with McKinsey. Or Bain.)
McKinsey will rapidly set up office in a large conference room on-site, as if it’s the makeshift command-and-control center of an air base in Kuwait on the eve of Operation Iraqi Freedom, and they’ll deploy a dozen MBAs with a weighted average age of 26.5 years across the company’s headquarters. The consultants will meticulously evaluate all levers for revenue growth, including M&A, organic growth from new customers, and organic growth from existing customers (either by reducing churn or just finding ways to get more money out of each one). M&A will quickly get crossed off the list, since McKinsey doesn’t want Goldman coming in and taking over, and new-customer growth is always just painful, so, by process of elimination, they’ll decide on getting more money from existing customers.
After performing an analysis called a customer segmentation, McKinsey will realize that the company has already squeezed every last dollar possible out of the company’s highest-paying customers, whose loyalty is already pushed to the limit. They will therefore instead try to figure out how to get more money from lower-paying customers.
Associate 1: How do we get more money from our cheapest customers?
Associate 2: Can we go back to selling ring tones, like we did in 1998?
Associate 1: I did a case study on that at HBS! Ten minutes go by. Anyway, that’s why it won’t work. What if we just… raised prices?
Associate 2: These customers are highly price-sensitive. We can’t do that unless the customers think they’re getting additional value.
[CONTINUED IN NEXT TWEET]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F8rsqAEX0AAzc_A.jpg)
Olivia
Online
Kimberly Johnson
@Kaye_Elle_Jaye
Life is too short to wake up with regrets, so love the people who treat you right and pray for the ones who don't.
Detroit Suburbanite
Joined November 2012
371 Following
33 Followers
884 Posts
Pinned Tweet
@tberry3 Says he was able to recall things like,
PERSON👤 WOMAN👩🦰 MAN👨🦰 CAMERA📸 TV📺
Hmmm... I recalled that too. Does that mean I'm a #GENIUS? I was also GREAT at the Picture Memory Card Game in 3rd Grade! Shall we try #PickUpStix next? Folks We Have A Fool At The Helm #WeDeserveBetter
[CONTINUATION]
Partner 1, dialing in from a McKinsey G6 en route to the biweekly partner offsite in Bermuda: Just change them over to an upgraded plan, add five bucks to their bills, and let them call to opt out if they don’t like it.
Associates 1 and 2, simultaneously: Sir, you’re brilliant!
The associates will go on to conduct a handful of focus groups to check the box and be able to tell the company that they won’t actually lose customers by doing this (side note: they’ll be wrong), and they’ll build a financial model showing that the loss in customers is offset by the higher average sales price (again, wrong). All of this will be summarized in no fewer than 80 PowerPoint slides in the main deck and another 120 in a deck of supplementary materials (no, that’s not an exaggeration), with enough charts to cause even the most hardcore of actuaries to reconsider his life and contemplate getting a job as a poolside bartender at Margaritaville.
Once finalized, the McKinsey partner and the SVP of strategy will present their work to the board, who will spend no more than 90 seconds discussing it before approving the changes over their second round of old fashioneds that afternoon.
And that’s why your phone bill keeps going up.
PS. Two years later, after the new strategy has been demonstrably proven not to work, McKinsey will once again get engaged to figure out a better approach.
For anyone here who hasn’t worked in corporate strategy at a Fortune 500 company and wants to understand how utterly bone-headed decisions—such as changing your customers’ cell-phone plans unless they proactively call to opt out—get made, here’s a quick explainer 👇
This chain of events typically starts during a quarterly board of directors meeting, during which an independent director (generally a current or retired CEO of a company in a different, non-competing industry) says that the company isn’t making enough money and that it’s the fault of the CEO, who is a supremely unqualified buffoon.
(Tangent: Every board director has his own pet favorite metric, be it growth (e.g., year-over-year sales), profitability (e.g., EBITDA margin), investor returns (e.g., change in share price if public, return on invested capital if private), or some byzantine metric that he used to love when he was the division president of a Ma Bell carve-out back in the 1980s (e.g., change in same-store gross profit divided by number of people on the sales team, raised to the power of pi and divided by 1998, which represents the year his current girlfriend was born). The exact metric doesn’t matter; what matters is that, by the standards thereof, the CEO sucks.)
The independent director will then pull open the calculator app on his iPhone 7, punch some numbers in, and say something to the effect of, “If we can increase revenue per customer by just $5, our market cap will increase by billions. Get your strategy team to figure it out.”
From here, the CEO and the CFO will then set up a meeting with the SVP of corporate strategy for 7:15 AM the next morning, to be held in the locker room of the country-club whose $20k annual membership dues the company’s shareholders generously cover. Sitting in the sauna, buck naked save for bleached white towels barely sufficient for the mission to which they’ve been called, the executives will decide that the most prudent course of action is to call McKinsey and pay them approximately $2.5M to figure this out for them. (Note: The CFO will get a quote from his buddy at Deloitte or KPMG, just to be able to tell the board that they solicited competing bids, but everyone knows that the work is just going to end up with McKinsey. Or Bain.)
McKinsey will rapidly set up office in a large conference room on-site, as if it’s the makeshift command-and-control center of an air base in Kuwait on the eve of Operation Iraqi Freedom, and they’ll deploy a dozen MBAs with a weighted average age of 26.5 years across the company’s headquarters. The consultants will meticulously evaluate all levers for revenue growth, including M&A, organic growth from new customers, and organic growth from existing customers (either by reducing churn or just finding ways to get more money out of each one). M&A will quickly get crossed off the list, since McKinsey doesn’t want Goldman coming in and taking over, and new-customer growth is always just painful, so, by process of elimination, they’ll decide on getting more money from existing customers.
After performing an analysis called a customer segmentation, McKinsey will realize that the company has already squeezed every last dollar possible out of the company’s highest-paying customers, whose loyalty is already pushed to the limit. They will therefore instead try to figure out how to get more money from lower-paying customers.
Associate 1: How do we get more money from our cheapest customers?
Associate 2: Can we go back to selling ring tones, like we did in 1998?
Associate 1: I did a case study on that at HBS! Ten minutes go by. Anyway, that’s why it won’t work. What if we just… raised prices?
Associate 2: These customers are highly price-sensitive. We can’t do that unless the customers think they’re getting additional value.
[CONTINUED IN NEXT TWEET]
![RobertMSterling's tweet photo. For anyone here who hasn’t worked in corporate strategy at a Fortune 500 company and wants to understand how utterly bone-headed decisions—such as changing your customers’ cell-phone plans unless they proactively call to opt out—get made, here’s a quick explainer 👇
This chain of events typically starts during a quarterly board of directors meeting, during which an independent director (generally a current or retired CEO of a company in a different, non-competing industry) says that the company isn’t making enough money and that it’s the fault of the CEO, who is a supremely unqualified buffoon.
(Tangent: Every board director has his own pet favorite metric, be it growth (e.g., year-over-year sales), profitability (e.g., EBITDA margin), investor returns (e.g., change in share price if public, return on invested capital if private), or some byzantine metric that he used to love when he was the division president of a Ma Bell carve-out back in the 1980s (e.g., change in same-store gross profit divided by number of people on the sales team, raised to the power of pi and divided by 1998, which represents the year his current girlfriend was born). The exact metric doesn’t matter; what matters is that, by the standards thereof, the CEO sucks.)
The independent director will then pull open the calculator app on his iPhone 7, punch some numbers in, and say something to the effect of, “If we can increase revenue per customer by just $5, our market cap will increase by billions. Get your strategy team to figure it out.”
From here, the CEO and the CFO will then set up a meeting with the SVP of corporate strategy for 7:15 AM the next morning, to be held in the locker room of the country-club whose $20k annual membership dues the company’s shareholders generously cover. Sitting in the sauna, buck naked save for bleached white towels barely sufficient for the mission to which they’ve been called, the executives will decide that the most prudent course of action is to call McKinsey and pay them approximately $2.5M to figure this out for them. (Note: The CFO will get a quote from his buddy at Deloitte or KPMG, just to be able to tell the board that they solicited competing bids, but everyone knows that the work is just going to end up with McKinsey. Or Bain.)
McKinsey will rapidly set up office in a large conference room on-site, as if it’s the makeshift command-and-control center of an air base in Kuwait on the eve of Operation Iraqi Freedom, and they’ll deploy a dozen MBAs with a weighted average age of 26.5 years across the company’s headquarters. The consultants will meticulously evaluate all levers for revenue growth, including M&A, organic growth from new customers, and organic growth from existing customers (either by reducing churn or just finding ways to get more money out of each one). M&A will quickly get crossed off the list, since McKinsey doesn’t want Goldman coming in and taking over, and new-customer growth is always just painful, so, by process of elimination, they’ll decide on getting more money from existing customers.
After performing an analysis called a customer segmentation, McKinsey will realize that the company has already squeezed every last dollar possible out of the company’s highest-paying customers, whose loyalty is already pushed to the limit. They will therefore instead try to figure out how to get more money from lower-paying customers.
Associate 1: How do we get more money from our cheapest customers?
Associate 2: Can we go back to selling ring tones, like we did in 1998?
Associate 1: I did a case study on that at HBS! Ten minutes go by. Anyway, that’s why it won’t work. What if we just… raised prices?
Associate 2: These customers are highly price-sensitive. We can’t do that unless the customers think they’re getting additional value.
[CONTINUED IN NEXT TWEET]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/F8rsqAGW0AARJ6f.jpg)
@NestleUSA Where do I call regarding stock shares received by former Stouffer employees (in the 70s & 80s)? Phone #?
@RevJacquiLewis This was just quoted by a reporter/writer (1:19:24 time marker) who was interviewed in episode 1 of the FX/Hulu documentary THE RANDALL SCANDAL
@YNB SMH 🤦🏾♀️
@YNB Soooo shouldn't she see this as CONFIRMATION the elections WEREN'T STOLEN???? 🤔💡 #AskingForAFriend
@thesquanchy420 This is a story that has always saddened me for all involved. Four young lives destroyed, 2 lives taken and 2 incarcerated, all 4 leaving collateral damage for their families, friends and the community to have to deal with. Just a sad, sad story all around.
Focus on your YOU season so you can get to YOUR season! Love you ❤️
@ulovemegz The one who comes to your driver's side window... Lol
The racial wealth gap can be closed. @KimberlyEAtkins explains.
For more, visit https://t.co/NH8vPrr1PL.
The racial wealth gap can be closed. @KimberlyEAtkins explains.
For more, visit https://t.co/NH8vPrr1PL.
@natasharothwell I TOUCH & AGREE WITH YOU ON THAT!!! 🤝🏾
@WOODY_THEGREAT @Delta So does that means you just missed #WillSmith slap the dog mess out of #ChrisRock at the #Oscars ???
@BachelorABC @ClaytonEchard "This is not meant to be a competition..."??? Ummmm.... THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THIS SHOW IS!!! WHAT WORLD ARE YOU LIVING IN? #TheBachelor IS A COMPETITION TO FIND ONE LOVE, NOT 3. #TheBachelorABC #Gaslighting continues. #RunGabby #RunRachael
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Negro
Seen from Germany
كوكب السودان
Seen from France
Minh Trung
Seen from Vietnam
Dr. Zara | Couple
Seen from United Arab Emirates
VManiak Jilbab
Seen from Indonesia
つるや＠なろうにて小説執筆中 
Seen from Japan
Zeko Mshakel
Seen from Egypt
pitpul_dog
Seen from Germany
KANG HANNA THAILAND
Seen from United States
Tâm Lê
Seen from Vietnam
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
113.9M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.6M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.7M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.7M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.1M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
72.9M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
65.9M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.8M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers