@GaoJingjie@MsSuh104 I agree, it seems that the president has received some kind of a cult following that comprises of people who are willing to take everything he says to heart. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@BrowneAubrie@MsSuh104 I agree, now the idea of parties is based more on what the party believes rather than individual thought. Groups speak louder than individuals, and yet they are more difficult to rationalize with to find the best solution for everyone. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@TomoyoshiKimur1@MsSuh104 I agree, the power to reject a politician could lead to an abuse of such power and cause opponents to demonize each other even more in the hopes to get the other rejected. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 I do agree that there is a "new normal of political demonization" in the US since politics revolves around promoting one side while criticizing the other. It seems that this strategy is the most effective, and all sides are guilty of using it. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 Since President Trump's election the tone of politics has shifted to be more outrageous, but such a tone has already been present in US politics for some time. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@Angelitocaball2@SewellZanya I agree, but for such changes to be effective they would have to be nationally instated since differences between city policies could cause major problems if the sanctuary cities become overcrowded. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@TomoyoshiKimur1@MsSuh104 I agree, those who do not respect the law and are looking to take advantage of holes in the system would gravitate towards areas of the country where laws are less strict which makes more of a problem for everyone in that area. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 The benefit of sanctuary cities is that they encourage racial diversity in a their communities. The drawback is that the police may be lacking information about those who entered illegally. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@ncrowley8@MsSuh104 Although I agree, the only reason why the ICE requests aren't mandatory is because of constitutional conflicts. From the perspective of ICE, such coercion works toward achieving their goals. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 I would change the state's involvement in enforcement funding since the local law enforcement should not have to act based on a fear of cut finances, they know what is best for the community they actively work in. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 The most interesting fact I learned from the video was that the Detainer Requests sent by ICE to local law enforcement were optional due to constitutional policies. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@Jennife87206173@MckenzieBrowne1@MsSuh104 Although I agree with you, the politics of a country are not a priority for some people possibly because they are indifferent on the matter or do not have time to consider their options even if it directly affects the way they live. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@KristianaKourt1@GaoJingjie@MsSuh104 I agree, as time goes on it is possible that such divides in a community would grow. Although with the internet connecting many different types of people such beliefs might weaken or become even stronger. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@lukeredmore @MsSuh104 I agree, the way the internet and social media connects communities can bring out the worst in some people. The anonymity can also cause them to stop seeing those they hate as people since they are spurred by their own ideals. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 I believe my generation will be able to put differences aside better, but not entirely, since most people would be more used to diversity as another generation passes. However radicalization could become more common and have more powerful impacts. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 I do not believe that my community is safe from hate-related crime since such acts could occur anywhere at any time. People willing to commit such crimes anywhere in the world shows that it is possible to happen here, especially in the digital age. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@lukeredmore @MsSuh104 I agree, if birthright citizenship were to end there would be more risk for illegal immigrants to start a family since all of them could be subject to deportation or similar actions. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@Nesert3@MsSuh104 Although I agree with your point, without birthright citizenship children of illegal immigrants could be deported with their parents but this just adds higher risk and probably wouldn't stop immigrants from seeking the opportunities mentioned. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@TomoyoshiKimur1@MsSuh104 I agree, birthright citizenship encourages the diversity in a country as immigrants would feel that their children are guaranteed the rights of a citizen and don't have to go through a system in comparison to other countries without it. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion
@MsSuh104 The community is affected since non-citizen immigrants would be discouraged to raise a family in the US as the government's policies would be seen as against them. #SuhAPLang#APLangDiscussion