@Rajiv1841 Shut up
Check Rinku's last 10 innings
He hasn't done a shit.
If u r dropping abhishek what have surya done to retain his place? Not even his captaincy skill helps him retain his place.
@gaandfaadtits What have Tilak Verma done to deserve another chance?? At least if Abhishek clicks he will win the game single handedly but don't see that coming from tilak anytime soon. All he does is eats up the balls and gets out trying to make up for it.
@Vipintiwari952 Anchor role is required only when there is a major collapse. Anchor needs to go hard post 17 over with if batting first and finish the match if chasing. Only time Tilak did this was asia cup final that too with major help from dube. Fact: He's not good enough to play for india.
@IMManu_18 This dude was never good enough to make it to the playing 11 for team India. His failures always hide behind India's consistent wins. His failures are not dramatic like Sanju's and Abhishek's ongoing duck phase. Playing at the strike rate of 120-30 consistently is a concern.
Why is Tilak Verma still in the playing 11. Apart from his back to back centuries he's never looked comfortable in international cricket. His dot ball percentage is too high to be part of the playing 11 for team India. @BCCI#T20WorldCup2026#INDvsNed
@bhogleharsha Sir, it's because of the rampant corruption that exists in Arunachal cricket bodies. I am from Arunachal and there's zero talent scouting by the authorities. The same set of influential players have been playing since forever for the state.
@mufaddal_vohra Authorities in Arunachal have made a mockery of cricket. The same players have been playing for the last 10-15 years. The money received from the BCCI is used only to fill their pockets & zero ground work for talent scouting. Please ask some accountabilities @BCCI@BCCIdomestic
@magnum_vk18 @serpentblanco@TheCricketPanda No it's not
147 strike in 2016 is exactly the same as 147 strike rate in 2025. Meaning it was and is fair enough but is definitely not comparable to 202 strike rate