Olivia
Online
i am
@KellyMc1970
Just a simple man
Joined October 2021
581 Following
412 Followers
2.4K Posts
Canada is no longer an “independent sovereign country”. The only question left is do you want to be controlled by the globalists, China, India or the US. Those are your options #Alberta51stState
You Asked For Him - We Got Him - And He Will SHOCK You...
@scoopercooper
Canada, are we the beachhead for WWIII?
"China is using Canada as a proxy, I can't say it any simpler"- @scoopercooper
We are under the control of globalists. Those currently on the “team Canada” bandwagon are supporting their own demise
Who is the real Mark Carney
Everything he says is true about Gen X 😂. Should have left us alone, but you decided to FAFO.
Secrets of the United States according to artificial intelligence
These are a little too accurate:
1) The economy is not broken. It was designed this way. Every time the economy crashes or wealth inequality gets worse. People say that the system is failing, but the truth is that it's working exactly as it's intended. The US economic system was built to funnel wealth upwards while keeping everyday people in a cycle of debt dependence and financial insecurity. The cost of living isn't skyrocketing because of a mistake. It's keeping people struggling because it makes them easier to exploit
2) Division is the oldest trick in the book. The biggest illusion in the US right now is that the real fight is left versus right when in reality it is the powerful versus the rest of us. Politicians, corporations and media outlets fuel division because the population that a population that is angry at each other is too distracted to hold those in power accountable. Racism, class warfare and political polarization aren't just unfortunate side effects of society. They're intentionally kept alive because they keep people from uniting against those truly hoarding wealth and power.
3) Censorship isn't always obvious. While many people think of censorship as governments banning books or blocking websites, modern censorship is far more subtle and it looks like flooding the internet with noise to bury real information, silencing independent journalists through demonetization or blacklisting, using misinformation labels selectively to discredit dissenting voices even when they're asking valid questions, encouraging self-censorship by making people fear, social or professional consequences for speaking out. The goal isn't to remove the information. It's often to make it so hard to find or so socially risky to discuss that people just stop looking
4) War is about power and resources. Anytime a new conflict arises, the media presents it as a moral battle, but the reality is that wars are almost always control about control over resources, economic power and strategic influence, whether it's oil, mineral trade, routes or minerals, trade routes or ideological dominance. This part is in bold. Nations don't send people to die for freedom. They do it for money and control. The US military industrial complex profits from constant conflict, which is why endless wars and foreign interventions never stop
5) If the government wanted to solve major problems it already would have, whether it's homelessness, healthcare, wealth inequality, or environmental destruction. The truth is that these problems exist. Because keeping them unsolved benefits those in power. A sick, poor, and desperate population is easier to control, manipulate and profit from the idea that change is impossible is a lie. There is simply no incentive for the people in charge to change it
6) Probably the most important, you have more power than you think. The biggest secret of all regular people in bold are the greatest threat to the system. The reason powerful people, the powerful keep people divided, struggling, and distracted is because if enough people woke up again in bold, things would change overnight. Throughout history, real change has only ever come from people refusing to accept the status quo, not from politicians or corporations suddenly growing a conscience
“The question is, what will people do with this? Knowledge? Awareness is the first step, but action, especially collective action is what forces real change — I hope you know that we are more powerful united and you are more powerful than you think”
This is the question most Albertans have been asking themselves lately:
What are we getting out of this relationship with the rest of Canada?
We generate billions of dollars in wealth for the country, only to have Ottawa decide how much wealth we're allowed to generate for them and for ourselves. We receive very little back while the media and political classes- whose existence is largely dependent on charity from Alberta- can routinely point to Alberta as a national pariah.
It's the same story for Saskatchewan and BC- except the lower mainland of BC is so overtly liberal they'll maintain their steadfast devotion to Canadian socialism even as they're being suffocated by it.
I can say personally I'm finished with the idea of Canada as it is. The Pierre Trudeau brand of soft communism is an obvious failure and I find it profoundly poetic that it was his adopted son who brought it all down 30 years after it was introduced.
Canada is unquestionably broken, and as long as Canadians refuse to fix it, it will continue to drown until it dies. At this point it would be in the west's best interests to cut our losses and start fresh on our own- or as members of the United States.
I'd rather have someone tell me the uncomfortable truth, than a soothing lie.
Trump isn’t getting enough recognition for what he is doing right now.
Just a couple months ago, Ukraine was firing US/UK missiles into Russia, and Russia was showing off hypersonic ballistic missile systems.
The world was the closest it’s been to nuclear war since 1962.
Trump stopped all this from escalating, and is currently negotiating a lasting peace plan to normalize relations with Russia and China. He’s even trying to initiate a trilateral nuclear disarmament agreement to reduce the size of all three nations’ nuclear arsenals.
Trump is cancelling WW3 and saving the world from nuclear destruction, and the Left still claim he is Hitler.
So according to 👇 it’s okay for Canadians to boo the Canadian anthem for feeling frustrated over a hostile and unpredictable lib govt that’s left us feeling betrayed. Right?
Booing the Star Spangled Banner in Montréal doesn’t make Canadian fans bad sports. On the contrary. It is their opportunity to give voice to frustration with a hostile and unpredictable Trump government. Americans are going to find out increasingly how Canadians feel betrayed. #Not51 🇨🇦
Dear Canadian Leftists,
It's not so funny now that Trump and the Americans are looking to impose their will upon Canada, is it?
Understand that this is what you have been doing to the rest of us for decades: Green energy scams, carbon taxes, vaccine mandates, DEI programs, etc.
The problem we have now in Canada is that too many Canadians are willing to destroy and keep destroying Canada with their voting habits just to appease their Donald Trump Derangement Syndrome.
And that's a good 30% of Canadians.
You can boo the American anthem all you want but it's Canada that's becoming a 3rd world country, not America.
But you really showed them, didn't you? 🤤
Just another reason for Alberta to part ways with the rest of Canada
"Honesty in advertising" on Flag Day would look like this in Canada ⬇️
“We reject Canadian deference to authority. We refuse to be subjects any longer. We do not consent. Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of liberty, says the American Declaration of Independence, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it. Or to depart”
It's not really my place. I’m an Ontario boy. I do not claim to represent Alberta’s sentiments. But if I was from Alberta, this is what I would say.
Canada,
I had a reporter from a mainstream US publication contact me and ask me the following questions about my Mark Carney post.
"Thanks for your response, Jason. I'm working on an article about Mark Carney’s leadership in crisis management, its current state, and its impact on Canada’s economic future. I’ve been impressed by your perspective, especially given your expertise in finance and crisis leadership.
I’d love to feature your insights in the piece and would be happy to compensate you for your time. Here are a few questions I’d appreciate your thoughts on:
-Mark Carney’s Leadership in Crisis: How would you assess Mark Carney’s leadership during the 2008 financial crisis and COVID-19? What makes his approach effective?
-Comparison to Anthony Fauci: Do you think it’s fair to compare Mark Carney to Anthony Fauci in crisis management? What similarities or differences do you see in their roles?"
Here's my response.
Thank you for reaching out. I appreciate the opportunity to contribute insights into Mark Carney’s leadership during various financial crises, his broader globalist agenda, and what his potential leadership in Canada could mean for the country's future. No compensation is required. If you find my work helpful, credit would be appreciated.
To address your first question, Carney’s leadership in the 2008 crisis was, IMO, a short-term fix that caused long-term damage to Canada.
2008 Financial Crisis: Canada’s “Success” Set Up Future Failures
Carney was hailed as the central banker who kept Canada out of the worst of the global recession, one of the best in the G7, but how did he do it?
To stimulate borrowing, Carney aggressively lowered interest rates from 4.25% in February 2008 to 0.25% by April 2009, aligning with global central banking trends. He also encouraged massive consumer and government debt expansion to keep the economy running and set the stage for future inflation through policies tied to international banking systems.
The result? Canadian household debt skyrocketed, locking many Canadians into unsustainable mortgages. This artificial economic stability relied on future inflation, which, predictably, we are experiencing today. Some say that Carney laid the foundation for Canada’s record-high inflation in 2022–2024.
Carney’s Role in Brexit
Carney’s tenure as Governor of the Bank of England (2013–2020) was marked by aggressive monetary policies that, according to critics, destabilized the UK economy. His handling of the Brexit-era financial policy was particularly controversial, as he pushed for low interest rates and mass printing, which later contributed to high inflation and economic instability.
The Carney Brexit playbook was similar to his 2008 response in Canada. Excessive quantitative easing with the Bank of England printing massive amounts of money to offset economic uncertainty, ultimately devaluing the British Pound and weakening the UK currency, making economic recovery harder post-Brexit.
Liz Truss’s Warning to Canada
Recently, former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss publicly criticized Carney’s economic mismanagement, saying, "Mark Carney was governor of the Bank of England, and under his tenure, too much money was printed. This damaged the British economy and put our economy off track."
Truss’s warning to Canada is clear, and Carney’s track record proves he is a reckless spender willing to print money and prioritize globalist policies over national economic stability.
Carney’s monetary policies in the UK mirror those more recently in Canada under Trudeau and Freeland. Skyrocketing inflation due to mass government spending and debt with closer economic integration with global institutions like the WEF, IMF, and UN that is weakening our national currency.
Liz Truss saw the damage Carney did to Britain. If history repeats, Carney will drag Canada into deeper debt, inflation, and dependency on global banks.
I think Carney’s approach is predictable: a short-term economic stimulus that requires long-term sacrifices.
When appointed (not elected) as the PM, I predict we will see Carney to push for more borrowing with dependency and integration into the global economic order.
Now, to address your second question about the Anthony Fauci comparison and why I say they are there for the crisis they may have helped create.
It is a fitting comparison, not just because of their roles in crisis management but also because both are tied to globalist institutions (Carney to WEF, UN, IMF—Fauci to WHO, Gates Foundation, Big Pharma), involved in major crises before showing up with a “solution” that benefits their networks and connected to industries that profit from the crises they manage (Carney to global banks, Fauci to pharma).
Fauci & AIDS – The Problem and the Response
Fauci's handling of the AIDS crisis in the 1980s mirrors his handling of COVID-19. He promoted experimental, expensive pharmaceutical solutions like AZT (azidothymidine), which later turned out to be harmful. He downplayed alternative treatments in favour of those benefiting large pharmaceutical companies. He consolidated public health power, ensuring future crises relied on his recommendations.
The result?
Many believe the pharmaceutical response was worse than the disease itself, while Fauci secured lifelong ties to the pharmaceutical industry, ensuring his influence over future public health crises.
Carney & the Global Economy – The Problem and the Response
Just as Fauci’s career benefited from crises in public health, Carney has built his legacy on financial disasters. His low-rate debt stimulus from 2008 to 2013 created conditions for record inflation in the 2020s. His WEF/UN climate finance policies force businesses and governments into ESG compliance, shifting power from nations to global institutions. His advocacy for digital currencies (CBDCs) could lead to financial surveillance and control over personal spending.
The potential result?
A future where global banks, not national interests, dictate Canadian economic decisions. The massive national debt, serviced through international lenders, ensures Canada’s resources and workforce serve global institutions over domestic needs.
I predict the next economic crisis (a trade war?) will be used to push even greater global financial centralization.
The pattern is clear: Fauci and Carney show up for crises they helped shape and then offer “solutions” that benefit global elites, not those affected by the crisis.
IMO, Carney isn’t a national leader. He’s THE globalist manager. His career isn’t about strengthening economies for people. It’s about positioning nations into the global banking system.
If he follows his historical patterns, we can expect more short-term fixes that create long-term financial burdens. Even more borrowing, higher taxes, and weaker Canadian independence with closer alignment with WEF, UN, and IMF economic directives over Canadian priorities.
The last time Carney ran Canada’s economic policy, he set the stage for today’s inflation crisis. Do we want to hand him the keys to the entire country?
The people who got mad at the Convoy for protesting in Ottawa and called people waving the Canadian flags dumb...
Are now all headed to Ottawa to wave the Canadian flag and call Donald Trump dumb.
🤣🤣🤣
OTTAWA – Yesterday was Day 2 of the Federal Court hearing, where Justin Trudeau’s government is trying to convince a judge that shutting down Parliament to avoid Well, folks, here we are. Day two of the Federal Court showdown, where the Trudeau government is desperately trying to convince Canadians that shutting down Parliament to protect their own hide was a completely reasonable thing to do. They want you to believe that this is all perfectly normal, that it’s routine, that it’s just a quirk of the system. Nothing to see here, folks!
But the problem with lying is that eventually, you get caught. And on Day 2 of this hearing, Justin Trudeau’s legal team got caught. Over and over again.
If you watched what unfolded in court, you saw the Trudeau government’s lawyers flailing like fish on dry land, fumbling through weak excuses as Chief Justice Paul S. Crampton shredded their arguments one by one. At one point, they actually misrepresented a legal precedent in court, only for the Chief Justice to read the case aloud and reveal that it actually contradicted their argument. Humiliating.
And that was just the start.
This case isn’t just about whether Trudeau technically had the ability to prorogue Parliament. It’s about why he did it—and more importantly, whether Canada is now a country where the Prime Minister can shut down democracy whenever it gets inconvenient for him. Because if the courts let this stand, what’s stopping the next Prime Minister from proroguing indefinitely? What’s stopping the government from suspending Parliament every time there’s a corruption scandal, every time they fear a non-confidence vote, every time they need to cover up a mess of their own making?
And that’s exactly what Trudeau did. His government was facing multiple crises all at once—a massive financial scandal, a looming non-confidence vote, and an economic firestorm caused by Trump’s tariff threats. So rather than actually dealing with it, he shut Parliament down. The question is: Did he have the right to do that?
Trudeau’s Legal Team Has One Argument: “The Court Can’t Stop Us”
The Trudeau government’s lawyers had one job today—convince the court that prorogation is beyond judicial review. That was it. That was their entire strategy. Not that it was necessary. Not that it was ethical. Just that there’s nothing the court can do about it.
They started by arguing that Justin Trudeau isn’t responsible for prorogation at all. No, they said, it was actually the Governor General who did it. That’s right—the Trudeau government is now claiming that the Prime Minister of Canada, the man who publicly announced on January 6 that he had decided to prorogue Parliament, wasn’t actually responsible for proroguing Parliament.
Naturally, Chief Justice Crampton wasn’t buying it. He pointed out that no Governor General in Canadian history has ever refused a Prime Minister’s request for prorogation. That’s right—never. The Governor General is not some independent actor who just wakes up one morning and decides, You know what? Let’s shut Parliament down for a couple of months. That’s not how this works. The Prime Minister advises it, and the Governor General rubber-stamps it.
So why is Trudeau’s government suddenly pretending like he had nothing to do with it? Simple. Because if they can convince the court that this was the Governor General’s decision, then the case gets thrown out.
But that’s just the beginning of the absurdity. Trudeau’s legal team then went on to argue that there are no legal limits on prorogation whatsoever. That’s right—none. According to them, the Prime Minister could prorogue Parliament indefinitely, and there’s not a thing the courts or anyone else could do about it.
The Chief Justice was visibly skeptical, and for good reason. If prorogation has no limits, then Canada is no longer a parliamentary democracy—it’s an elected dictatorship.
At one point, Crampton asked them how Parliament is supposed to hold the government accountable if it’s shut down. The response from Trudeau’s lawyers?
Well, Parliament can hold the government accountable when it returns.
Yes, you read that right. The government’s actual defense is that Parliament can hold them accountable later. Which, of course, is exactly the point. Because what happens if they just prorogue again? And again? And again? The court kept pressing, but the government had no answer.
JCCF @JCCFCanada Lays Out the Real Reason for Prorogation: Trudeau Was Cornered
Now, let’s talk about what Trudeau’s government was really trying to avoid. Because while his lawyers were playing legal word games, the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms was laying out the cold, hard truth.
Trudeau shut down Parliament because his government was about to be exposed on multiple fronts.
First, there was the Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC) scandal. Millions of dollars had mysteriously gone missing from a government-controlled green technology fund, and the Auditor General had uncovered serious financial mismanagement. Parliamentary committees were demanding answers, and Trudeau’s government was stalling. So what did they do? They shut Parliament down.
Then, there was the looming non-confidence vote. Opposition parties had been publicly discussing bringing down Trudeau’s minority government. Conservative MP John Williamson, Chair of the Standing Committee on Public Accounts, had even put it in writing. If the vote happened, Trudeau could have lost power. So what did he do? He shut Parliament down.
And let’s not forget the economic mess with the United States. Donald Trump had announced plans for 25 percent tariffs on Canadian goods. Trudeau’s government was scrambling to come up with a response, but there was one major problem: any new spending to deal with the crisis would require parliamentary approval. But Parliament wasn’t sitting anymore. Because Trudeau shut it down.
The JCCF laid all of this out in court, showing that Trudeau didn’t prorogue Parliament for the good of Canadians—he did it to protect himself. And the Chief Justice seemed to take their arguments seriously.
What Happens Next?
The Chief Justice has promised to issue a ruling before Parliament resumes on March 24. That means this case will be decided before Trudeau can walk away and pretend none of this ever happened.
If the court rules against the government, it will mean that future Prime Ministers cannot abuse prorogation to avoid scrutiny. It will send a clear message that shutting down Parliament to protect yourself is unconstitutional and illegal.
But if the government wins, it will mean that the Prime Minister can shut down democracy anytime he wants. It will mean that Canada is no longer a functioning parliamentary system but a country where the executive can do whatever it pleases.
And if that happens, ask yourself this: What’s stopping the next Prime Minister from just shutting down Parliament indefinitely?
Trudeau might be stepping down soon, but his legacy of corruption, incompetence, and political cowardice will haunt this country for years. The question now is whether the courts will allow him to rewrite the rules of democracy on his way out the door.
We’ll find out soon.
🇨🇦 Oppressive Taxation is Crushing Canadians
Since 2015, under the Liberal Government:
- Income taxes are up 64% 📈
- Government expenses are up 60%
- Total debt increased by 93% 💸
Can Canada bounce back? If so, how long will it take?
Today in 399 BC, Socrates was sentenced to death for "corrupting the youth" of Athens.
What did he say that was so dangerous?
He taught them to think for themselves — via 3 simple steps... (thread) 🧵
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
HanTur3306
Seen from Turkey
Peter
Seen from Vietnam
สูงวัย.ใจดี
Seen from Thailand
gakuran_6
Seen from United States
金谷年年
Seen from United States
reza bahenol
Seen from United States
Sue
Seen from Turkey
🔥🔥فحل🇲🇦 واعشق قحاب
Seen from Algeria
Thick Hyung Dudes
Seen from Turkey
Dani Maneja
Seen from United States
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.6M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.1M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.8M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.8M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.2M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.1M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.9M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers