Kelly Lewis

Independent artist from Manitoba, soaking in this new reality. seek truth , speak truth. Canada. IG @kelly_lewis_artistry

[Gad Saad @GadSaad]

To my dear Canadians, is this worrisome or is it Islamophobic to be concerned?

[DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY @DonaldBestCA]

Most Canadians have no idea what the Islamic call to prayer actually says. The media give Canadians a gentle one-line summary and stop there. They do not broadcast the full words. The full text is harder to wave away.

Many hear it as a claim of dominion over the ground it covers.

The media translate it as "Allah is great." That is wrong. The word is akbar, the comparative. It means greater, as in greater than all else. "Great" hides what the word actually claims.

The 'call to prayer' is an aggressive public religious proclamation declaring that Allah is greater, that there is no god but Allah, and that Muhammad is Allah’s messenger.

When amplified over a city, it asserts Islamic theology into shared civic space. One direction. On a schedule. Heard as a claim of dominion over the ground it covers.

Dominion. Canadians used to call this country The Dominion of Canada.

Canadians should not be bullied into pretending that this is just a harmless cultural chime like a church bell. Canadians have every right to object to the precedent in Regina, Saskatchewan.

Amplified Muslim religious proclamations should not be allowed in Canada. We have seen what became of the United Kingdom, and its own government is now investigating the Muslim rape gangs and the cover-up.

Islamic scriptures, tradition and classical law contain commands to fight and subjugate unbelievers, and to kill apostates. They permit the enslavement of non-Muslim captives and their use as sexual property. These have never been formally repealed. They remain the position of all four Sunni schools, and they are still issued as religious rulings today.

The troubling point is not that every Muslim acts on these texts. Plainly they do not. The troubling point is that the texts remain unrepealed, taught as authoritative, and still acted upon by those who choose to.

Regina is 'the camel's nose under the tent.'

Thanks to @rupasubramanya for the video.

The Muslim Call to Prayer - Sunni version as in Regina

Allahu akbar, Allahu akbar
Allahu akbar, Allahu akbar

God is greater, God is greater.
God is greater, God is greater.

Ashhadu an la ilaha illa Allah — twice
I bear witness that there is no god but Allah.

Ashhadu anna Muhammadan rasul Allah — twice

I bear witness that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah.

Hayya ʿala al-salah — twice
Come to prayer.

Hayya ʿala al-falah — twice
Come to success.

Allahu akbar, Allahu akbar
God is greater, God is greater.

La ilaha illa Allah
There is no god but Allah.

[Kelly Lewis @KellyVictoriaLe]

Well said

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

https://t.co/yvJOwOS4xE

[CooperBaggs 💰🍞 @edgaralandough]

Lukewarm take: we need to stop using mental health/therapy buzzwords in day to day life. Not everyone you dislike is a narcissist. Being sad doesn’t mean you’re depressed. There’s a resounding difference between being nervous and having anxiety. You’re not ADHD because you don’t like to sit still. You’re not autistic because you’re quirky. OCD doesn’t mean you’re organized. And for the love of all that is holy, not every situation that made you uncomfortable is “trauma”.

[Kat Kanada 🏴 @KatKanada_TM]

Carney’s MPs better revolt and this better be his end as Prime Minister.

[Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 @ryangerritsen]

4 years after the Freedom Convoy CTV is still pushing misinformation & fake news regarding it.
Here they put on “political scientist” Stephanie Carvin who claims that it was not only foreign funded, had Russian influence, but the biggest problem were the Canadians who protested against the Government. They were home grown far right extremists.

You can’t hate the media enough.

[SaskLass @SaskLass]

First thing Monday morning call the mayor’s office and demand that this practice discontinue. And keep calling until the appropriate action is taken.
Mayor Chad Bachynski 306-777-7339

[DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY @DonaldBestCA]

Politics stopped a police investigation into a cluster of infant deaths.

The most important legal case in the history of Canadian policing is about to enter the appeal process - immediately after an internal tribunal sentences the convicted police officer at the next hearing.

@OttawaPolice Detective Helen Grus, a veteran investigator in the Sexual Assault and Child Abuse Unit, was convicted of Discreditable Conduct under Ontario’s Police Services Act on March 25, 2025.

Incredibly, Tribunal Officer retired Superintendent Chris Renwick found that Detective Grus should have asked for permission before initiating an investigation into an unusual cluster of infant deaths – due to the “political and societal ramifications” of her inquiries, and because she was investigating “public officials”.

The written decision eliminates the right and duty of Canadian police officers to conduct investigations without political interference – or to investigate public officials or politicians without prior permission from above.

If allowed to stand, the Grus decision will undermine public confidence in the independence of police investigations, and cause serving police officers to look the other way when they suspect wrongdoing by ‘public officials’ or see possible crimes that have ‘political ramifications.’

That decision is reprehensible, and corrupt.

Renwick’s decision to convict Detective Grus will forever stand as a monument to cowardice, institutional self-protection, and the corruption of the very foundation of policing in Canada.

"There shouldn't even be a charge of discreditable conduct. There shouldn't be a penalty…the tribunal is trying to conceal evidence of criminal negligence.”

Helen Grus's legal counsel Bath-Sheba van den Berg to Tribunal Officer Chris Renwick - September 4, 2025 as quoted by journalist @JayUnrau

Link to full downloadable decision in next comment.

[Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD]

On her last day as Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard declassified the COVID cover-up.
Never-before-seen documents. Fauci's fingerprints on the intelligence itself. A lie told to Congress under oath.
Here is what just dropped. 🧵

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

🚨THIS IS A MAJOR SCANDAL!

Senator Ron Johnson:

“This is a MAJOR SCANDAL! Hundreds of thousands of people are permanently disabled or lost their life because our FDA ignored the COVID injection harms.”

Hundreds of thousands.
Permanently disabled.
Dead.

Because the FDA ignored the safety signals.

The mainstream media still won’t cover it. They’re protecting the narrative instead of the people.

How many more Americans have to be destroyed before we get real accountability?

[DNI Tulsi Gabbard @DNIGabbard]

Today, on my final day as Director of National Intelligence, I’m releasing never-before-seen communications and documents exposing how Dr. Fauci provided millions in US taxpayer dollars to fund dangerous gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab, worked with politicized elements within the Intelligence Community to suppress the truth about his actions and hide the virus’ lab-leak origins, and lied to Congress while under oath in 2024. It’s time you know the truth.

https://t.co/3YJSstB7d4

[Jas @keepontruckin78]

🚨🚨⚠️ CANADA: BILL C‑22 IS AN 11‑ALARM FIRE ⚠️🚨🚨

If you live in Canada and you’re using “the cloud” for email, documents, messaging back‑ups, or anything sensitive, you need to understand what’s happening right now with Bill C‑22 (“Lawful Access Act”).

This isn’t tech paranoia. It’s a structural change to how easy it is for the state to get identifying data and metadata about you from the services you rely on. Once that scaffolding is built and normalized, it’s almost impossible to dismantle.

What C‑22 does in plain language

It expands “lawful access” tools so police and intelligence can get subscriber information and other identifying data from telecoms and online service providers more easily.

Subscriber information isn’t just your name: it includes account identifiers, contact details, service periods, and device‑related info – more than enough to link accounts, IPs and devices back to you and to map who talks to whom.

It creates a framework for the government to order core providers and “electronic service providers” to collect and retain metadata on everyone for up to a year.

It allows secret orders and gag clauses so providers can be forced to cooperate while being legally barred from telling you.

Translation: if your email, files, chats, or projects live entirely in other people’s infrastructure, those systems can be turned into quiet mapping tools for your relationships, your habits, your reading lists, your political work, and your sources.

This hits whistleblowers, journalists, activists, psychiatric survivors, and anyone in vulnerable situations first. They’re the ones who rely on “private” DMs, proton‑style accounts, self‑hosted services behind the cloud, and ad‑hoc leak channels. If the metadata around those channels is being retained and is easy to compel, anonymity evaporates.

You do not need to be doing anything illegal to get burned. The risk is in how easy it becomes to:

reconstruct who contacted a tips line or advocacy group;

trace who suddenly started emailing or uploading documents around a scandal;

link pseudonymous accounts back to real‑world identities via devices, IPs and patterns;

map entire networks of people based purely on who interacts with whom and when.

PSA: STOP BEING A SITTING DUCK

If you haven’t already, treat tonight as the line in the sand.

Get critical email out of generic cloud accounts. If all of your sensitive mail lives in a single mainstream provider account tied to your real name and phone, that’s your weakest link.

Pull your sensitive files off “free” clouds. Anything that would harm you or others if it were deanonymized (whistleblowing material, mental‑health records, political strategy, legal fights) should not sit indefinitely on someone else’s servers under their log and retention regime.

Assume metadata will be kept. Even if content is encrypted, logs can show which accounts connected, when, from where, and in what patterns. Act accordingly.

Segment your life. Don’t run your entire political, professional, and personal existence through one identity, one mailbox, one cloud drive. Compartmentalization is not tinfoil; it’s basic safety.

This is not about “go off‑grid tomorrow.” It’s about refusing to be a passive, undefended target while the rules are being rewritten around you. There is still time to move, but not if you treat C‑22 as just another bill.

🚨🚨 Call to action 🚨🚨

Move your high‑risk email and files off generic cloud platforms tonight.

Tell your friends, coworkers, and comrades in Canada that Bill C‑22 is an 11‑alarm fire for privacy and accountability.

Email your MP and opposition MP's and tell them to oppose C‑22’s metadata‑retention and lawful‑access framework.

This isn’t about perfection. It’s about refusing to leave every part of your life sitting on someone else’s hard drive, waiting to be queried. Bill C‑22 is trying to turn “the cloud” into a surveillance‑ready archive. Don’t be a sitting duck.

[Kelly Lewis @KellyVictoriaLe]

@Gina_T1 @grok What I’m more concerned about is what happens in the room after they effectively turn off the lights. They’re preparing.

[Matt Van Swol @mattvanswol]

The victim testimony of 'Felicity' from the Rape Gang Inquiry is the most horrifying thing I’ve read in my life.

She was 8 years old when it started…

> First assaulted just after her 8th birthday, lured into a back room on the pretext of helping put up a shelf

>Told she'd be "taken away" if she ever spoke, which was the start of years of rape and torture

>Trafficked on to groups of older Muslim men, collected by taxi after school and on church nights

>Forced to take part in the abuse of other children, used deliberately to "normalise" it and buy her silence

>Groomed with a fake love story: told a man "adored" her, that marrying him was "God's plan," and that she had to convert to Islam

>Handed a book on Islam by one of her abusers and told to learn it

Then came the captivity:

>Held in houses with an upstairs "punishment room" fitted with dog-crate enclosures

>Watched a girl accused of going to police have a hot iron pressed into her back. That girl later died. Felicity saw her strangled

>She and another girl, "Char," were both impregnated. Every pregnancy ended in miscarriage

>Later told the men had killed Char and she would "never come back"

>Saw a girl shot in front of her by a man she believed was a serving police officer

>Threatened that she'd be "chopped up and fed to pigs" if she ever told

It only escalated:

>Loaded into a van in a crate with other girls, some trafficked in from abroad to be "sold," who spoke no English

>Made to watch a girl be stabbed, beaten and set on fire for talking back to a buyer

>Hung upside down by her feet, whipped and urinated on by a man who openly idolised Fred West

>”Purchased" for a night and raped by numerous men while her main abuser sat and watched

>Forced to witness a baby tortured with cigarettes and then killed, while its mother was made to watch

And through all of it, no one believed her...

>For years she was disbelieved and dismissed, she says, treated as though she was inventing what was being done to her

>She had carried it almost entirely alone. Her statement to the Inquiry was the first time in her life she had ever been able to give a full account of what happened to her. No one before had ever properly listened

>When she finally found the courage to report one of her abusers as an adult, at 27, she was not believed

...you don't understand

SO SO SO many people need to be executed for this.

[Dr. Leslyn Lewis @LeslynLewis]

I was honoured to present a petition signed by more than 15,000 Canadians concerning the proposed World Health Organization pandemic treaty and related amendments to the International Health Regulations.

Canadians want greater transparency, accountability, and parliamentary oversight before Canada ratifies international agreements that could have significant implications for our country.

Thank you to the thousands of Canadians who took the time to make their voices heard. In a democracy, major decisions should not be made behind closed doors but should be debated freely. Canadians deserve openness, scrutiny, and accountability from their government.

[PoliceOnGuardForThee @PoliceOnGuard]

Detective Helen Grus’ sentencing hearing is scheduled for tomorrow, Thursday June 18th, 2026 at 10:00 am.

This is the first time since the beginning they’ve allowed the public to view the hearing online, so let’s make sure we show our support!

For those that can’t be there in person, here is the link to view the hearing;

https://t.co/sOVQddRPrf?…

Meeting ID: 863 5225 9706

Passcode: 174526

Stay tuned for further updates as Detective Grus and her council have already indicated they will be appealing this decision, so further court dates will be expected.

If you’re able to donate to assist, here is the link to do so; https://t.co/WvAe7Ht8Qi

[DonaldBest.CA * DO NOT COMPLY @DonaldBestCA]

🚨 Canadians should make the Detective Helen Grus sentencing hearing impossible to ignore.

Ottawa Police will publicly broadcast it this Thursday, June 18, at 10am ET.

Detective Grus asked whether unexplained infant deaths could be connected to the mothers’ COVID vaccination status.

For that, @OttawaPolice charged her, convicted her, and destroyed her career.

Now Parliament is preparing to hear sworn testimony about COVID vaccine injuries and deaths.

So tune in.

Let the corrupt Ottawa Police know Canadians are watching.

We know exactly what they did.

And they will not bury this.

Link in next comment.

[Melanie In Saskatchewan @saskatchewan_in]

Just a thought.

At some point, if governments continue using their unelected majority to force controversial legislation through Parliament with limited scrutiny, debate, or examination, I have to wonder whether Canada eventually sees demonstrations that make the Freedom Convoy look small by comparison.

Not because anyone is organizing one and not because anyone is calling for one, though I wouldn't blink if it happened tomorrow.

Because there is only so much frustration people will absorb before they decide they've had enough.

For years we've watched an expanding collection of legislation touching privacy, online speech, identity verification, government oversight of digital activity, and other areas many Canadians view as fundamental freedoms. Each bill arrives wrapped in the language of safety, security, protecting children, combating harms, or modernizing regulations.

Taken individually, many Canadians shrug. Taken together, some see a pattern.

The real question is whether governments understand how much resentment they're creating by continually asking citizens to surrender a little more privacy, a little more autonomy, and a little more control while insisting nothing important is changing. And doing with a majority they were never elected to hold.

History suggests that when enough people feel ignored long enough, they eventually stop grumbling around kitchen tables and start showing up in public squares.

I don't know if Canada is there yet, but it may be closer than you might think.

I do wonder how much further politicians think they can push before they find out.

[Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms @JCCFCanada]

The Government of Canada postponed the 2025 federal budget until November. But it is rushing Bill C-22, the Lawful Access Act, through committee before Parliament adjourns on June 19. Apparently, expanded surveillance powers are more urgent than the federal budget. Make it make sense.