Nigerian canned tomatoes are a health hazard. Though a staple in most homes, they contain dangerously high levels of sodium, about 169 mg per 100 g, compared to just 10ā24 mg in most European brands.
Unlike European products that are almost pure tomato with no added salt, many Nigerian brands contain just 20ā30% tomato concentrate and some donāt even disclose their ingredients at all.
Every time you try to "overcome a price objection," you accidentally prove to the prospect that you are overcharging them.
āNobody in the sales industry will tell you this:
The more you speak to defend your price, the cheaper you look. The moment you start sweating in the DMs, the power dynamic instantly shifts from Doctor and Patient, to Cat and Mouse. And you are not the cat.
Walk into any busy motor park in Nigeria and you will find the Agbo (herbal medicine) seller.
He stands in the sun with his voice as loud as a megaphone, sweating through his shirt.
He spends hours going back and forth with the crowd.
"Are you sure this thing works?" a man asks.
"Will it not purge me?" a woman shouts.
The seller has to defend his product, swear on his grandfather's grave, and drink a cup of it himself just to prove it isn't poison.
He is fighting objections in real-time.
Now, walk into the consulting room of a top-tier Neurosurgeon.
He looks at your MRI scan for two minutes.
He writes a name on a piece of paper, slides it across the desk, and says, "You need this surgery by Tuesday, or you will lose feeling in your left leg. It costs ā¦5 Million."
Do you argue with him?
Do you ask him for a discount?
Do you ask if he can drink the anesthesia first to prove it works?
No. You take the paper, thank him, and go look for the money.
Most of you are marketing like the Agbo seller, but expecting the Surgeonās respect.
You get into the DMs and write 5-paragraph essays defending your ā¦100,000 price tag.
You get on "Discovery Calls" and spend 40 minutes fighting a prospect who says, "I need to think about it."
You have memorized 20 different scripts on "How to overcome the price objection."
Hear ye the truth:
If you are fighting objections at the point of sale, your marketing has already failed.
Marketing is not about convincing people to buy.
Marketing is the surgical process of systematically destroying every single objection in your prospect's mind before they ever see your offer.
By the time they click your link or enter your DM, the only question they should be asking is, "Where do I pay?"
If you have to defend your value, you haven't demonstrated it.
For the next 24 days, we are destroying the Agbo seller mentality. I am going to show you how to use your daily content to surgically remove doubts so that closing becomes an afterthought.
Stay with me...
This is just Day 6. Stop arguing. Start diagnosing.
=================
Leave a comment & repost if you found some light in this one.
~ V.O.V
The reason this feels so good is because your brain was taxing you for a week straight and you didnāt even notice.
Every time that undone task crossed your mind, your anterior cingulate cortex fired a conflict signal. Small. Subtle. But metabolically expensive. Your brain was running a background process on that 5-minute task 24/7 for 7 days, burning glucose and generating low-grade cortisol each time it surfaced.
Neuroscientists call this the Zeigarnik Effect. Incomplete tasks occupy more mental RAM than completed ones. Your brain literally cannot let go of open loops. So that ā5 minute taskā was never 5 minutes. It was 5 minutes of execution plus 168 hours of ambient cognitive load.
That relief you feel when you finally do it? Thatās a dopamine spike from closing the loop combined with a cortisol drop from removing the threat signal. Your body just stopped paying a week-long neurochemical tax on a debt of 300 seconds.
This tells you everything about how procrastination actually works. The loop runs like this: task feels slightly aversive ā amygdala flags it ā you avoid it ā avoidance provides immediate relief ā brain learns avoidance = reward ā task stays open ā background stress accumulates ā task feels MORE aversive than it originally was.
The fix is stupidly simple and Huberman talks about this constantly. You donāt need motivation. You need a forcing function that bypasses the amygdalaās threat assessment. Set a timer for 90 seconds. Tell yourself youāll stop after 90 seconds. Your prefrontal cortex can override 90 seconds of discomfort. Once you start, the dopamine system switches from avoidance to pursuit, and the task completes itself.
The 5-minute task was never hard. The starting was hard. And every hour you waited made starting harder.
BREASTMILK
She thought she was studying milk.
What she uncovered was a conversation.
In 2008, evolutionary anthropologist Katie Hinde was working in a primate research lab in California, analyzing breast milk from rhesus macaque mothers. She had hundreds of samples and thousands of data points. Everything looked ordinaryāuntil one pattern refused to go away.
Mothers raising sons produced milk richer in fat and protein.
Mothers raising daughters produced a larger volume with different nutrient balances.
It was consistent. Repeatable. And deeply uncomfortable for the scientific consensus.
Colleagues suggested error. Noise. Statistical coincidence.
But Katie trusted the data.
And the data pointed to a radical idea.
Milk is not just nutrition.
It is information.
For decades, biology treated breast milk as simple fuel. Calories in. Growth out. But if milk were only calories, why would it change depending on the sex of the baby?
Katie kept digging.
Across more than 250 mothers and over 700 sampling events, the story grew more complex. Younger, first-time mothers produced milk with fewer calories but significantly higher levels of cortisolāthe stress hormone.
The babies who drank it grew faster.
They were also more alert, more cautious, more anxious.
Milk wasnāt just building bodies.
It was shaping behavior.
Then came the discovery that changed everything.
When a baby nurses, microscopic amounts of saliva flow back into the breast. That saliva carries biological signals about the infantās immune system. If the baby is getting sick, the motherās body detects it.
Within hours, the milk changes.
White blood cells surge.
Macrophages multiply.
Targeted antibodies appear.
When the baby recovers, the milk returns to baseline.
This was not coincidence.
It was call and response.
A biological dialogue refined over millions of years. Invisibleāuntil someone thought to listen.
As Katie reviewed existing research, she noticed something unsettling. There were twice as many scientific studies on erectile dysfunction as on breast milk composition.
The first food every human consumes.
The substance that shaped our species.
Largely ignored.
So she did something bold.
She launched a blog with a deliberately provocative name: Mammals Suck Milk.
It exploded. Over a million readers in its first year. Parents. Doctors. Scientists. People asking questions research had skipped.
The discoveries kept coming.
Milk changes by time of day.
Foremilk differs from hindmilk.
Human milk contains over 200 oligosaccharides babies canāt digestābecause they exist to feed beneficial gut bacteria.
Every motherās milk is biologically unique.
In 2017, Katie brought this work to a TED stage. In 2020, it reached a global audience through Netflixās Babies. Today, at Arizona State Universityās Comparative Lactation Lab, she continues reshaping how medicine understands infant development, neonatal care, formula design, and public health.
The implications are staggering.
Milk has been evolving for more than 200 million yearsālonger than dinosaurs walked the Earth. What we once dismissed as simple nourishment is one of the most sophisticated communication systems biology has ever produced.
Katie Hinde didnāt just study milk.
She revealed that nourishment is intelligence.
A living, responsive system shaping who we become before we ever speak.
All because one scientist refused to accept that half the story was āmeasurement error.ā
Sometimes the biggest revolutions begin by listening to what everyone else ignores.
I really didnāt expect this to get so much engagement. But I have been in a dark place lately (Iām always in a dark place tbh but lately???) and on my hardest night I stumbled on this video and it did something for me and I hope it helps someone too. Youāre not alone ā¤ļø
You figure this out the hard way, usually.
Not in a calm, notebook-at-a-cafe kind of way. More like standing in a kitchen at 23:58 with your heart in your throat thinking, why does talking to this person feel like emotional ping pong against a brick wall.
For years you think āemotionally availableā means they let you cry on their shoulder. They answer the phone. They listen. They say the right soothing sentences. They are there when you are falling apart. So you check those boxes and declare, yeah, this person is safe.
Then real life starts to press.
Something small at first. You say āhey, lately Iāve been feeling a bit distant from you.ā And you watch their whole nervous system panic in real time. Micro eye roll. Jaw clenched. Suddenly they are joking, deflecting, turning it into a bit. Or they get weirdly angry, like you accused them of a crime. Or they shut down, eyes going flat, saying āI donāt know what you want from meā while their whole body leans away.
You clock it as āthey canāt handle my feelings.ā
What youāre actually watching is a person who canāt handle their own.
Because your sentence didnāt just drop your emotion into the room. It woke up theirs. Guilt. Shame. Fear of failure. Fear of being the bad guy. Old stuff from childhood about never being enough, or always being blamed, or being yelled at when someone else was disappointed. All that rises like smoke, and instead of breathing it, they throw it back at you.
Emotional availability is not about who brings the tissues when you cry.
It is about what a person does when their own chest starts to burn.
Take the classic āwe need to talkā moment. You sit on the couch, heart pounding, rehearsing your lines. Youāre not trying to attack. Youāre trying to connect. You say something like āwhen you disappear for days without texting, I feel really anxious, like I donāt matter to you.ā
Now watch.
If they are unavailable to themselves, they will sprint away from whatever comes up inside them. They will say āIāve just been busyā in that tone that means drop it. They will bring up one time you were slow to answer as a counterattack. They will make a joke out of your fear so they donāt have to feel their own discomfort. They might even start crying in a way that swivels the spotlight around, so now youāre comforting them for being āsuch a terrible partner.ā
They are not actually with your feeling. They are fighting for their self-image.
Because to sit with you in that moment, they would first have to let their own stuff hit. The guilt of knowing they did pull back. The shame of not being as attentive as they want to believe they are. The fear that they are failing you. The grief of realizing they may not know how to do better yet. That is a lot. If they have zero practice staying with their own emotions, they will do anything to dodge that hit.
So they stonewall. They over-explain. They start a lecture. They shut down.
And you walk away thinking, maybe Iām too sensitive.
Youāre not too sensitive. You are just bumping into someone who has a lifelong habit of abandoning themselves the second anything heavy shows up. Of course they abandon you too. It is the same reflex.
There is a reason people who are emotionally available to themselves are usually not the smoothest talkers.
They might stumble. They might say āI need a second, this is bringing up a lot.ā They might go quiet and actually think. They might admit āhearing that makes me feel ashamedā and let that hang in the air. They might say āI want to stay with this even though part of me wants to run.ā
That right there is availability.
Not perfect behavior. Not perfect regulation. Just the willingness to stay in the room with what they are feeling instead of throwing it on the floor or on you.
You see the difference most clearly in conflict.
Two people are fighting. Same argument as always. One says, āyou never listen.ā The other says, āyouāre always criticizing me.āš
Few years ago, I was sweeping the dusts of Shomolu, PWD, Oshodi with my feet while doing market research for Dufil foods, amidst other hustlesā¦
Today, Iām the Biggest Web3 Host in Africa and a Pharmacistā¦
ā¦.and weāre just getting started!
Another birthday, another call. One birthday tradition I always look forward to.
Thank you so much for the prayers today @ronaldnzimora !!!! God bless you sir!š„¹ā¤ļø