Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy.
Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes.
The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled.
The conclusion is one sentence.
"At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand."
An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody.
Here is how you get there.
A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself.
Because the workers who were fired were also customers.
When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation.
The loop has no natural exit.
The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements.
Every single one failed in the model.
The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger.
No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it.
Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion."
Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem.
Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it.
Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place.
Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University ·
The 2024 edition of the Asia Power Index launches today. The headline is that the US remains the top power in Asia, but China is continuing to gradually erode the US military advantage, especially in Asia🧵 1/15
Nancy Pelosi just bought $50k-$100k in call options for $TEM.
It’s unusual for her to invest in small-cap stocks, so now everyone is wondering what’s so special about it...
Luckily, I was already preparing a thread about the company.
Here's an extensive summary of $TEM's investment thesis: 👇🏻🧵
Adding Year One Foundation for foreign students in collaboration with Kaplan can at least secure some revenues, while student satisfaction takes a lot of effort to achieve
It is actually more rewarding to lift up the rankings , at least more students and more funding can be secured
As to Student satisfaction,a vast majority of respondents won’t blast their frustrations in surveys Those already graduated probably will choose to remain in silence
It is actually more rewarding to lift up the rankings , at least more students and more funding can be secured
As to Student satisfaction,a vast majority of respondents won’t blast their frustrations in surveys Those already graduated probably will choose to remain in silence
Editorial: U of A cares more about rankings than its own students https://t.co/BbnShfOe2n via @@The_Gateway
The Uni has had an experience back in 2003
https://t.co/jzrroua7Kd
One natural guess is co-op opportunities are not that ample at UoAlberta, as perhaps circumstances outside the campus are force majeure
https://t.co/xmjeADztFc
Editorial: U of A cares more about rankings than its own students https://t.co/BbnShfOe2n via @@The_Gateway
The Uni has had an experience back in 2003
https://t.co/jzrroua7Kd
@gilduran76@newrepublic Is this really new, though? In the Guilded Age you had crazy wealthy people who were into similar utopian, authoritarian or “scientific” ways of organizing society or “perfecting” humans. Eugenics arose in this time.
Since 2017 when China first began issuing GECs, renewable energy generators have sold these certificates to subsidize their revenues from selling electricity. https://t.co/1WRFJKcDq3