Kent James

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@ScourgeHH @ThatOneVitaFan If Falcom spent 3+ years to make some game that ended up having quality of DB2 then they got way bigger problem. So assuming it’s not going to be like that, then yes, because whatever extra year they spent “polishing” would not move the needle for me.

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@ScourgeHH @ThatOneVitaFan Because some of us have no faith that the game is going to be so polished to the point of justifying the wait, maybe Falcom surprise us then I’ll recalibrate my expectation

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@kingslayer253 I feel Heiyue's characters are...fine, I just don't really care about their stories. Elsaim though, ooof

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@Moosetafa2000 It's fine if it's next year release, otherwise I think it's bad that they can't finish develop up a new story for 3 years.

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@kingslayer253 If we are picking one game it’ll be CS1 for me, if we are talking the arcs then probably Sky trilogy.

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@_Onchigo_ @king_of_games34 @Ru_cchino @XC_Enel Well, by 2027 it’ll be 3 years, and if it’s not gonna be out in 2027 then it’ll be at least 4 year gap mid-arc, it’s honestly crazy

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@TigerBombLady @SickosCommittee Harvard has most overall wins though with 30

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@TigerBombLady @SickosCommittee Good schools all have good math students. But yeah MIT has been dominating this competition (assuming this is the Putnam competition) lately, the last time they didn't win was in 2018 (Harvard).

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@BarretSLeBlanc @SickosCommittee Field Archery (Where they shoot in the field and in some competitions they compare the distance in addition to accuracy) or Pole Archery (knocking off target from a pole), USA Archery does hold a college field archery championship as well: https://t.co/OCugpa5LRs

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@Magsrndnmbs @Timo_NFL Yeah but teams all decide that they like the odds of penalties better

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@Magsrndnmbs @Timo_NFL Yes, but with Golden Goal rule you lose 100% of time if you concede first, so teams simply just played not to concede.

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@YedIin @Buchanan_615 Byproduct of Jozy Altidore got hurt

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@theboldmoose @Prominent_Bryan ah right, my bad I misread, you said "additional", got too triggered by a bunch of people said "unlimited" in other threads

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@theboldmoose @Prominent_Bryan Well for one, change from 3 sub to 5 and to make it unlimited are two very different things, and two at some point they can’t, and I’d argue unlike hockey, it’s harder to score when people are getting tireder.

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@bivpack @Prominent_Bryan They do that before (1998-2004) and it turns out the opposite happen: teams find out they actually like that 50% odds better and everyone defend intensely to avoid losing. It’s different in hockey as you facing way more shots for that to be viable strategy

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@theboldmoose @Prominent_Bryan Well, yes, that’s kinda the point. If hockey is played without subs, they wouldn’t do unlimited OT either. (And that it would be a different sports where they’ll play in the completely different ways)

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@TongDFS @JustinMacmahan I think you got it backwards man, Uruguay was 1928 Olympics Champion, they were one of the favorite (just maybe not as much as Argentina). In 1950 they might not be a dark horse, but no one expect them to beat Brazil.

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@TheCricket_Chap Isn’t Sam Curran still can’t bowl right now?

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@Window_94_ @nocontextfm1 Detail are hard to find out but probably that player came on half time didn't get to the stadium till half time

[Kent James @Kent_CT]

@erikbryn @SammyandHector @TitleTalkTCL They had 2 actually, they used one after Brady got sacked on 2nd down.