@JSkeleton92@AustinJohnPlays Sure, but doesn't it make more sense for a company to sponsor a creator with more reach? From a business perspective, when a company sponsors a creator, its not about who they can help out. Its about who can better promote their products and make more sales.
🍄 Who is up for some Mario Party?
The Mario Party Decathlon that gathered @Valkyrae, @LudwigAhgren, @fuslie and @SqueeX15 registered 50.5K Peak Viewers!
Full stats with @EsportsCharts:
➡️ https://t.co/gZlJXSYySb
@Hogjaw_Twaddle@Valkyrae@sussydbaka Cool, thanks for the additional context. With only 25% weight of where the creator is originally from, you'd think they'd consider Rae to be in Cali.
Reading those comments, it seems they got a lot of others wrong too. lol
@bashbarian@Valkyrae@sussydbaka Nah, check it again. You have it backwards. This lists the home state of all these channels. There is no way every one of these channels has the most subs out of their home state. That would be quite impressive if it worked like that, actually. lol
@Valkyrae@sussydbaka This is cool and all, but I'd like to see what data this is based on because there are definitely bigger channels from Washington. lol
Quick Google search shows Cut and Tati, for example.
My YouTube dude Jeffrey confirmed my yt stream viewerships isn’t bots! Apparently the past few streams have been pushed on the suggested video tab by 75% due to the games I was playing. YouTube loves repo and Fortnite :)
..I’ll stop calling yall bots now
Just FYI, after the YT stream ends, if you don't refresh, you can see how many people are still watching the vod. Of the 20k there were only about 2k behind the live.
The pattern of ever increasing viewers during the live never really happened like that before. Was always steady.
Have a couple working theories:
1. YT autoplay is filtering afk viewers to the live stream.
2. Someone is botting viewers (idk maybe in hopes she streams on YT more?)
@SDBOnyxx Exactly, the viewers behind live have always counted towards the total. It shouldn't matter if they are watching the most recent part or not. There are still that many people watching the stream at any given time.
Linus be like:
"Yes, our YouTube channels have been hacked... But have you hacked a bank account yet to afford our new Floatplane subscriptions!?
Floatplane. Now, starting at $99 monthly, you can get access to all of our content while our YouTube is down."
Linus be like:
"Yes, our YouTube channels have been hacked... But have you hacked a bank account yet to afford our new Floatplane subscriptions!?
Floatplane. Now, starting at $99 monthly, you can get access to all of our content while our YouTube is down."
@Ky71281481@HumanoNoFake@hzjoe03@Rap Sure, he'd always have the stolen bars for free from his perspective. But looking from the business's perspective, if he buys enough bars, the stolen bars don't matter anymore because they got their losses back from the profit. In your case, it would need to be 400+ at 1/4 margin
@Ky71281481@HumanoNoFake@hzjoe03@Rap Sorry, saw this and wanted to give my 2 cents worth lol
Assuming bar is $1, item cost is $0.75. 10 bars stolen
Item cost can be "made up" for, by buying 30 bars, or 40 bars for the profit.
The bigger profit "makes up" for the cost of less bars stolen. At the cost of no new profit