Khaled

Owner & Ceo of @Fundingpips | Owner:@tradin
4M users | +300M Paid to traders

[Khaled @Khldfx]

It takes a lot of work to make something simple.

[Khaled @Khldfx]

1 2 3 4 …….

Keep on stacking them

[Khaled @Khldfx]

@Notjustokai 👊🏽

[Khaled @Khldfx]

🫡

[Daan04 @Daan04_]

CREDIT WHERE CREDIT IS DUE!

Another payout from @fundingpips. Another payout paid without any issues and on time.

Shoutout to @Khldfx and @avikkfp. You've created a trustworthy company.

Looking forward to the 100k mark!

[Khaled @Khldfx]

@flexxtrades 🤷🏽‍♂️

[Khaled @Khldfx]

@rudra_jaisara @fundingpips 1- your accounts were passed yesterday, where’s the 10 Days??

2- @avikkfp ban this guy for spreading false information. NOW.

[Sumit @sumitbafnafx]

Requested 30k from @fundingpips after a year.
Feels good to be back 🚀🧿

Glory days are back @Khldfx

[Khaled @Khldfx]

I guess he just crossed 300k in payouts from @fundingpips only

[Sumit @sumitbafnafx]

Requested 30k from @fundingpips after a year.
Feels good to be back 🚀🧿

Glory days are back @Khldfx

[Khaled @Khldfx]

@sumitbafnafx @fundingpips Did you cross 300k In payouts ??

[Khaled @Khldfx]

my lagos pipo. Make una visit the team today. We get plenty goodies for everyone

[Avikk @avikkfp]

Our independent KYC provider recently upgraded its verification systems and re-reviewed previously verified accounts. The upgrade is picking up document irregularities that earlier checks missed.

Here's one example. The user admits to editing their proof of address. They aren't the only one. We've received several similar messages.

We appreciate the honesty, but compliance doesn't bend. It doesn't matter when the documents were submitted, or that KYC was passed or payouts were received before. If a review finds the documents were manipulated, the account is closed under our Terms & Conditions.

How modern checks catch fake IDs:
https://t.co/dQJtfiYeaQ

How they catch edited bank statements and proof of address:
https://t.co/X6nO2mo2vx

[Khaled @Khldfx]

@TKTradez @astucefx @fundingpips No, we offered him a funded account with ondemand payouts.

There wasn’t a payout to start with!!

Don’t lie

[Khaled @Khldfx]

Cheating to maximize your gains or gain an edge in a system is something, and doing an illegal action is something else. This is called forgery. Where I live it’s a crime and you go to jail for that.

However I also appreciate sincere honesty and politeness, still Compliance is compliance.

Be like this guy at least, HONEST.

[Khaled @Khldfx]

@gabru_trader India 🇮🇳

[Khaled @Khldfx]

Enough for Today this Saturday brought back 2023 Saturdays.

Regardless have a blessed weekend, trade responsibly I get that props are easy money, you don’t need to cheat, forge documents or do anything stupid, not worth it.

Love and respect for the legit Pakistani’s and we keep on hammering the Bs folks out there while providing a proper service.

Back to work got alot of releases and launches coming out soon.

Might just do a Royal pardon too 🤷🏽‍♂️

[Khaled @Khldfx]

Instead of writing all of this, it would have been simpler to just verify, evidence are always attached in an any email,

Don’t defend for the sake of defending, you wanna speak be objective and unbiased.

Now how accounts and payouts are handled; let me tell you.

13,6k payouts - 14M roughly last month
Avg processing time = under a minute

Thank you

[Khaled @Khldfx]

Criticism, feedback aren’t the same as spreading false information, false narrative, fud, defamation, accusations, disrespect, coordinating hate through social media and WhatsApp to bully or blackmail someone.

Learn to differentiate between both.

We love feedback and hammer Bs sir.

Stand for principles and don’t be biased.

[Khaled @Khldfx]

@NinjaTrader_420 https://t.co/LFJiCe7DSF

[Avikk @avikkfp]

Abdullah, we reviewed both phases of your latest challenge alongside your full trading history with FundingPips. You passed both phases, and we recognize that. We also looked at how you managed risk during the challenge and how you traded across your previous Master accounts. That review informed the terms we offered for your next Master account.

On your latest $100K challenge, four trade ideas in Phase 1 each lost at least 2% of the account size. In Phase 2, six trade ideas reached that threshold. The largest loss on a single trade idea was 3.1%, or roughly $3,100.

Across your full history with FundingPips, including evaluations and Master accounts, 251 trade ideas each lost at least 2% of the account size. Of those, 63 lost at least 3%, including three that lost 5% or more. The largest loss on a single trade idea was 11.9%.

You received more than $27,000 in rewards and spent about $20,000 with FundingPips, so you received more in rewards than you spent. Your combined trading P&L across 17 Master accounts was −$71,890, excluding payouts. The first figure describes what you received versus what you spent. The second describes how the accounts performed over time.

During our Phase 2 review, we offered you the option to move to a Master account on the On-Demand reward cycle, with a striking system on each trade idea capped at 1% of the account size. We communicated that condition before issuing the account. This was an individual decision on your challenge. Your claim that we’re imposing this on every trader is false.

Risk management is part of trading. Repeatedly taking outsized losses and counting on one big trade or one big day to make them back is gambling on the outcome. At the Master stage, we look at how consistently you control risk, especially when trades go against you.

The decision and terms we offered you followed our trading review under Section 9(b)(iii) (Gambling Behavior), Section 9(d) (Account Restrictions), and Appendix A (Responsible Trading Policy) of our Terms & Conditions.

The ban was a separate decision based on your conduct after the review. You were entitled to challenge the decision. We banned you because we concluded that you coordinated abusive posts targeting FundingPips and members of our team and used those posts to pressure us to reverse the decision.

You said you would apologize publicly if your conduct matched what our CEO described. Based on our review, it did. We expect you to follow through on what you said.

[Khaled @Khldfx]

So his problem isn’t that he actually did something wrong and shared a device.

But the context, so I should technically start https://t.co/pcSvxk5FHA

Maybe the police should start asking thieves about the context of why they stole something as if it’s going to change something!!!

An action is an action.

That 100$ is killing me too 😭 he is acting as if it’s a 100k CONTEXT sir

Man said traders, no I won’t have tolerance for cheaters.

Traders are always welcome to do their business.

What can you reply to such principles🤷🏽‍♂️nothing but keep on hammering such individuals.

I might just meme you man

[Khaled @Khldfx]

@bazigar_fx @AlexMaharjan78 @avikkfp give him an account 😃

[Khaled @Khldfx]

@AlexMaharjan78 Unbanned **

[Khaled @Khldfx]

You don’t expect us to sympathize with you, even you are spamming us with insults, accusations, calling us a scammers more than your teacher called your name in mid school, come on 🤷🏽‍♂️

A mistake is a mistake, there’s a dialogue do talk and if rejected then it’s rejected because it’s on the other party to accept your apology or not.

Anyways you are unsend