Being called “far right” isn’t automatically a bad thing.
It just describes a party’s position on the political spectrum, usually meaning strong views on immigration, national identity, law and order, and a rejection of progressive social policies. Reform UK fits that description on social and cultural issues.
Some people support those positions because they feel the country’s been pushed too far in the other direction. They want stricter borders, fewer handouts, less identity politics, and more focus on British values. That’s a legitimate point of view in a democracy.
So calling a party “far right” isn’t name-calling, it’s just a way of saying they take a harder line than the mainstream. What matters is whether the policies are fair, legal, and delivered with respect for others.
The government only want to shut down X because if X didn't exist, nobody would have seen the video.
I haven't seen it in Facebook, or any other social media platforms. I haven't seen anyone, anywhere, even discuss what happened other than here.
@robblackie I've not seen the video of Elon Musk beheading some man in the street. Please share that as evidence of your claim that he is a national security threat.
The alleged attempted murder in Belfast, in which Sudanese asylum seeker Hadi Alodid has been charged, is horrific. A local man has suffered life-changing injuries and his family now face consequences that will last forever.
The riots that followed were wrong. Burning homes, cars and buses is criminal. Innocent people should never pay the price for the actions of someone else.
But let's stop pretending this anger came from nowhere.
For years, ordinary people have raised concerns about immigration, integration, foreign offenders, grooming gangs, public safety and community cohesion. Too often they have been dismissed as ignorant, racist or "far-right" rather than listened to.
People remember Rotherham. They remember Rochdale. They remember the repeated failures of authorities to protect vulnerable girls despite warning after warning. They remember being told that concerns were exaggerated, or that discussing them was somehow the real problem.
That is why trust has collapsed.
Most immigrants are law-abiding people trying to build a better life. But acknowledging that does not require pretending that every immigration policy has been a success, that every concern is unfounded, or that serious mistakes have not been made.
The establishment seems shocked by the public reaction. It shouldn't be.
When people feel ignored for years, resentment builds. When legitimate concerns are dismissed instead of addressed, frustration grows. Eventually something happens that ignites it.
The answer is not riots. The answer is restoring public confidence through secure borders, proper vetting, effective integration, deportation of foreign criminals, equal application of the law and a political class willing to have honest conversations instead of shouting down anyone who disagrees.
People are angry because they feel they haven't been listened to.
And that is the lesson politicians still seem determined to ignore.
Judge excuses cops handcuffing a dying, bleeding 18yo Henry — slashed face, gasping “I’ve been stabbed” — because “no clear evidence of stabbing in the dark.”
But zero evidence for the Sikh’s “he called me Paki” racism claim either.
They still arrested and cuffed the white kid bleeding out while believing the brown guy and his family’s lies.
DEI kills.
This body cam footage is extremely shocking.
You can hear Henry Nowak’s pleas about being unable to breathe.
And you can hear how the police dismissed them and failed to take action to try to save his life.
This is not just about knife crime. This is about police failure, poor police training and anti- white racism.
Who is going to be held accountable for this scandal?