KimberDS

[Carrie Sakamoto @Carrie298924321]

My legal team from Rath and Company are READY ! We are heading back into court June 15-18 to fight for the vaccine injured like me. Follow me and this live link below 👇

https://t.co/RoxfuqcGFP

[Kayla Pollock @kcpollock]

I’m starting to wonder if people have become immune to hearing my story.

At 35 years old, I went from being a healthy, active mom to being paralyzed from the neck down after a Moderna COVID shot. Two neurologists have now confirmed the diagnosis was caused by the shot.

My story has been featured on Global National. I was on the cover of City Life Magazine. I’ve spoken with Alex Jones, interviews with many who have appeared on Joe Rogan. I have the only jury trial lawsuit against Moderna in North America.

Yet somehow, it’s become old news.

MPs rarely respond. @PHAC_GC ignores us. Canada’s vaccine injury program still has thousands waiting, my ATIP requests show they don’t even have doctors assessing claims.

I’ve spent years fighting, not just for myself, but for every vaccine injured Canadian who has been abandoned and forgotten.

So now what? @DeanAllisonMP

What would you do if this happened to you?

[AshleY @Aku_700]

WTF 🤬: UK JUSTICE IS DEAD: Protestors Jailed Longer Than Black Illegal Migrant Rapist!

Three British men spoke out after a black illegal migrant sexually assaulted a 14-year-old girl in Epping — and the courts punished THEM harder than the actual criminal.

The black Ethiopian asylum seeker, Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, got just 12 months. The local men who protested his crimes are jailed longer.

This is not justice. This is open betrayal. Britain’s two-tier system now protects black foreign criminals while crushing its own people for daring to complain.
Native Brits are treated as second-class in their own country. This disgusting inversion must end now.
Wake up Britain!

[Ian Miles Cheong @ianmiles]

Fatigue.

[Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms @JCCFCanada]

Bill C-34 creates a social media ban for Canadians under 16 at the expense of all Canadians' privacy.

Sections 26, 27(1), and 27(2) of Bill C-34 require that affected social media platforms “implement age-verification and age-estimation measures designed to prevent a person under the age of 16 from being able to have an account with, or be otherwise registered with,” those social media platforms.

Bill C-34 requires that such measures must provide for the “protection” and eventual “destruction” of “personal information that is collected for age-verification or age-estimation purposes.”

It is not yet clear how this will be accomplished. What is clear is that these measures must be “effective.” Users commonly verify their age by submitting government-issued identification documents, such as driver’s licenses or passports. And, the technology exists for social media platforms to estimate the ages of users through biometric data, e.g., facial geometry, eye shape, skin elasticity, hairline, etcetera.

This age-verification and age-estimation monitoring will not be limited to Canadians under age 16. For social media platforms to determine access eligibility for any user, platforms will have to evaluate the access eligibility of every user.

The goal of Bill C-34 is not merely to remove Canadians under age 16 from affected social media platforms but to keep them off those platforms. To achieve this goal, social media platforms may be compelled to adopt ongoing age-verification/estimation measures to ensure continued compliance.

However affected social media platforms satisfy these requirements, Bill C-34 fundamentally reimagines how all Canadians access social media.

This Bill deputizes affected social media platforms into forcing Canadians to surrender more data as a precondition of participation in the digital public square. This, in turn, raises serious concerns about Canadians' privacy rights and may engage constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure - guaranteed by section 8 of the Charter.

Read the full text of the bill here: https://t.co/BAHnXrsJIR

[Nico Lagan @RealNicoLagan]

Canada's New Social Media Ban is NOT About Your Children | Here's What They're NOT Telling You

Canada just announced the Digital Safety Act — a social media ban for anyone under 16.

Most Canadians think this is about protecting children. It isn't.

To enforce a social media ban, every single Canadian will have to prove their age by attaching government-approved ID to their social media accounts. That's not child protection. That's a digital ID.

And once you're verified on one platform, that verification follows you everywhere — linking every account you own under your real identity.

But it gets worse.

This isn't a standalone policy. This is the missing piece that connects Bill C-9, C-22 and C-8 into a complete surveillance and censorship system.

Bill C-9 defines what you can and cannot say online. Bill C-22 forces platforms to save your data for up to one year. Bill C-8 gives the government the power to cut you off the internet entirely.

The digital ID created by this social media ban is what connects all three.

And they're selling it to you as child protection.

Don't be fooled. All these bills are interconnected — and this is the last piece of the puzzle.

https://t.co/8fky3EXQmF

[KimberDS @KimberDeeS]

@housewelf Just stay home if you don’t get it.

[KimberDS @KimberDeeS]

@DougEyolfson You are an unethical human being for not to providing FULL informed consent.

[KimberDS @KimberDeeS]

@torcator @ninavars 20% is already generous

[Gina Unfiltered @Gina_T1]

Hey @grok, what are the three biggest propaganda machines in Canada right now? Answer with a ranked list only.

[KimberDS @KimberDeeS]

@AndrewLawton @LinebackerMama What are the reasons for keeping them from Senators?

[Rebel News Canada @RebelNews_CA]

Homeowners furious after Ontario government threatens to seize portions of backyards 🏘️

Eight Burlington, Ont. homeowners face losing massive sections of their backyards to the provincial government without compensation. Why?

Talk about a most bizarre and baffling boundary dispute!

In sleepy Burlington, Ont., eight homeowners are fighting to save their backyards from the clutches of the Government of Ontario (the Ministry of Transportation to be precise.)

The homeowners face losing about two-thirds of their backyards. And they must also incur the costs of moving any infrastructure that stands in the way. This would include everything from backyard patios and storage sheds to even a swimming pool.

As to why the MTO is acting in such a fashion, this remains a mysterious question.

The crux of the matter is that the eight homes back onto the Queen Elizabeth Way highway. The current boundary is marked by a chain-link fence. As well, a few metres away from the chain-link fence stands a stone wall. One wouldn’t even realize there is a major highway on the other side of that stone wall unless this fact was brought to one’s attention.

By way of background, the eight homes in question were constructed some 70 years ago. And for seven decades the current boundary existed without controversy. But the MTO is now maintaining that the land in question has always belonged to the government and that the province is simply reclaiming land that has always been government property.

But again, what is the ostensible policy reason for this boundary extension? And why now?

This relatively little patch of land surely cannot be used to extend the highway, nor construct a railway line – the typical reasons for land expropriation by the government, or, in this case, land reclamation.

Rebel News ventured out to Burlington to interview the affected homeowners who have indeed lawyered up and are not bending the knee without a fight. They are also very concerned that in the expanded boundary area, homeless people might set up encampments, which would seriously impact their quality of life.

We also reached out to the media relations department of the MTO. Our queries included:

1⃣ The existing boundary has been in place for some 70 years. Why is the MTO now wanting to extend the boundary?

2⃣ What is the purpose given that there is not enough land in question for any sort of extension of the Queen Elizabeth Way (which is situated on the other side of the backyards)?

3⃣ I understand the residents will not be compensated for the loss of this land. Why is that the case?

Our queries were not even acknowledged, which, alas, is standard business procedure when it comes to the communications strategy of the Doug “For the People” Ford Progressive Conservatives.

In the meantime, this baffling boundary dispute appears to be headed to a court of law. Stay tuned.

@TheMenzoid

[Great Canadian Moose @Great_Cdn_Moose]

LISTEN UP ONTARIO:
Something big is happening in Ontario, and almost no one is talking about it.
Premier Ford has quietly passed a law that opens the door to water privatization across Ontario - and he's hoping you won't notice.

The Water and Wastewater Public
Corporations Act lets the government seize your local water system and hand it over to a for-profit corporation without your consent.
History is clear: when for-profit corporations control our water systems, the results are disastrous:

Bigger bills!
Bad service!
Dirty water!

Water is a human right not a commodity. It's not too late to stop this.
& Tell Premier Ford our water is NOT for sale. Take action now!

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

We are being scammed for our taxes by the government.

Maya’s family can’t find housing because our government flooded our country with 74,000 fake refugees & did not have any reasonable controls whatsoever on immigration.

Irresponsible mass immigration has consequences.

Now, Canadians, like Maya & her family, suffer.

Canadians whose parents, grandparents and themselves paid into the tax system their whole lives, can’t get the help they need, when they need it.

The government has turned our taxation system into a scam.

There was an understanding: we pay into the system for services we may one day need.

Instead, tens of billions flow overseas, billions flow into benefits for fake refugees that they let into our country instead of taking care of our own.

And even worse, they lie to us, that this is for some greater good.

If it were true, her family would have housing.

Instead, they take more, scam us & gaslight us in the process trying to make us feel guilty like it’s our responsibility to solve the world’s problems when we have plenty of our own.

SCAMMERS!

[JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦 @JayGenXer]

🔥 Canadian grandma just read The Globe and Mail’s latest and absolutely unloaded.

Article says: “As Canada faces crippling debt, it must do the unpopular thing and cut elderly benefits.”

Her response?

“These are the ones who paid the taxes in this country for how many years… the ones who have defended this country through our military.”

Instead of cutting seniors, how about stopping the immigration spending, the money we ship overseas, and the “lavish meals our prime minister spends upon himself”?

“I am so fucking sick of this country… get rid of this fucking tyranny.”

Seniors built Canada. They paid in. Now they want to cut their benefits while everything else balloons?

What do you think — fair or outrageous?

#SeniorBenefits #OAS #CanadaDebt #GlobeAndMail #CanadianSeniors #CostOfLivingCrisis #Trudeau #FraserInstitute

[Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 @ryangerritsen]

After years of working and paying taxes, the media is pushing for elderly benefits to be cut back. Meanwhile a refugee claimant receiving $224.00 per day in assistance is good to go.
You can’t hate the media enough in Canada.

[KimberDS @KimberDeeS]

@end3of6days9 They should have given the server a chance & he said they never caused any problems in the past, they did eventually conceded to the new server &now he just lost his regular customers who you can bet will tell their friends their version of events I think he should have let it go

[KimberDS @KimberDeeS]

@FoodProfessor R u serious? Speak out about religious slaughter BOTh of them. The general public if they knew wouldn’t want to participate in this program

[KimberDS @KimberDeeS]

@FoodProfessor How about NO religious slaughter forced on Canadians

[KimberDS @KimberDeeS]

@StevensCS1 @marksandspencer In every country & every large chain store they expect the honest ppl to pay for the thievery & that’s how they stay in business. Effing over the paying customers & they do absolutely effing nothing to prevent it. It’s a win for the corporation & an effing over the real customer