@AlbertansFirst@WesternStandard At least Forever Canada finally posted their contributions. I would be interested to first see financials from the orgs with the top contributions AND & from APP.
@AlbertansFirst@WesternStandard Yes, you definitely need to audit APP.
Why does only Let Alberta Decide have a huge amount of contributions? Where is the APP money?
@MoonJay589@jesseforyeg This! This is so true!! I found voter turnout to be abysmal. Then those that came out put these people in place.
Now those that don’t understand are angry at Smith for having to take the reins on an out of control municipality.
@Citizen004 Sold it for $1, while property taxes rocket upward. Sold it for $1 to destroy a neighborhood. Sold it for $1 so someone can remain elected.
@jesseforyeg@menard_ray I know, and 60 people showed up at city hall to show support for bike lanes, so hey, you know what…bike lanes remain important 😩
@ShayeGanam Provincial Government constitutionally has jurisdiction over municipalities.
Unfortunately < 30% of Edmontonians showed up for municipal election, but I believe a majority are upset about infill. Hopefully, People may think twice about staying home on election day.
@edmontonjournal Reverting to previously approved zoning should not increase taxes. Developers are responsible to charge new owners for new infrastructure and new builds will increase taxes based. Knack telling Edmontonians that “We will pay” is him threatening us. Terrible way to do business
@Martyupnorth I truly thought this was AI generated comedy when I first saw it. Unbelievable that it’s real. How did this embarrassment happen. Are there no sound advisors in her circle?
@TrevorRobb_ Everything Knack and Councillors said in this article is counter to what Edmontonians want.
1. In new developments, developers pick up cost for infrastructure and pass it onto buyers.
2. Buyers then pay their taxes for future upkeep.
3. If we revert, why all the study needed