Eco-friendly development of cellulose-based textiles, and recycling old clothes as new, again and again are no far to be an industrial practice. A short report on my research group and my PhD works.
@IoncellFibers#for_sustainable_future
https://t.co/DB5O0MVU55
Nice coverage of our joint @helsinkiuni and @AaltoUniversity innovation from BBC
BBC News - Wooden clothes on the recycled Christmas list? https://t.co/UZG8pDyphr
@pereabuc@RuneLinding@schneiderleonid@GerardMeijssen@kamerlinlab@RetractionWatch These irregularities are not exceptional. Open access will not avoid these cases. Anyhow, this is a side issue. The real problem for me is the forceful nature of plan-s. More time for discussion between scientists on how to best solve our publishing issues is needed.
@GerardMeijssen@pereabuc@schneiderleonid@kamerlinlab I don't see collective obfusication and deceit in our scientific community. Maintaining quality of peer review is implicit and at risk. Open access is for sure a worthy ideal. However, engagement of scientists with the public and politicians to interpret the science is better
@GerardMeijssen@pereabuc@schneiderleonid@kamerlinlab Is it really in the public interest to read all papers (or any they want). Do they care? Or do they care more about reaping the benefits that science and engineering brings?