AT LONG LAST! The Release of The Lost Recording of The 2025 Last Picture Shows Film Festival! 📽️🎬
25 Movie Reviews from 25 of our most insightful and influential Guys.
⭐️Full Guest List⭐️
🎞️Full Movie List 🎞️
🎟️and Link to Tickets below! 🎟️
🎉👇👇👇🎉
As genius as it is, The Simpsons is absolutely subversive cancer. Suffused with contempt for, in particular: fathers, working class Americans; the nuclear family; small town America; Christianity.
Occasionally poking gentle fun at Lisa's liberal elitism hardly compensates (if anything makes the subversion more effective).
John Doyle outlines why Leftists love the MAGA vs. "America First" divide and how it is promoted in social media algorithms and manufactured specifically to help Democrats.
"All of a sudden now they love conspiracy theories, why is that?"
@JohnDoyle
Clancy Update! Massachusetts has unique insanity law, which it looks like this is all coming down to.
So the new reporting is that there's one holdout, and the defense is trying to get that one juror removed on the basis of him (or her) not understanding the concept of reasonable doubt.
In most states, "reasonable doubt" doesn't come into the calculus for an insanity defense, because its up to the defense to prove with a preponderance of evidence (easier burden to meet than beyond a reasonable doubt) that the person was insane.
However, in Massachusetts, the burden to overcome an insanity defense remains on the prosecution. The prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not suffer from a mental disorder, or that if they did suffer from one, that they had the substantial capacity to differentiate right from wrong and control their behavior. In fact, in Massachusetts the defense isn't even called "insanity" it's called "lack of criminal responsibility."
So what's most likely happening is that one juror is stubbornly saying that the prosecution has met its burden of proof to show that Clancy, while diagnosed with mental illness and prescribed drugs, still knew right from wrong. All the other jurors are now probably saying that the prosecution has not shown beyond a reasonable doubt that Clancy knew the difference between right and wrong, because she was obviously mentally ill and on medications.
So this entire situation is very much turning into female OJ. Basically the jury has been convinced that there is some reasonable doubt about whether Clancy knew right from wrong, while there's probably one guy who, looking at the situation rationally, understands that if there's reasonable doubt about whether Clancy understood right from wrong, then none of the entire 21% of the female population on psych meds, nor the 15% of mothers who are diagnosed with post partum depression, know right and wrong. And voila, 40 million Americans can now suddenly get away with murder. Because according to psychiatry, isn't every single one of them mentally ill, and thus isn't there SOME REASONABLE DOUBT that they know right from wrong? What else does mental illness mean if not this?
And thus, quite obviously, there cannot be reasonable doubt in such a case, at least if you want to maintain a functioning society. It simply cannot be that 40 million women now have the right to commit murder. And of course the defense is saying it's not about all the possible women, it's about this woman. But this is simply unreasonable--there is no way for human beings to reasonably extrapolate and evaluate whether there's a chance that one "mentally ill" and medicated woman knows right from wrong while another doesn't. It's a matter of degrees that's too abstract to reasonably evaluate, and that is why there cannot be reasonable doubt. It is unreasonable to have doubt in such a situation. That's what reasonable means.
It really is a matter of loyalty to functioning of civilization versus loyalty to the cohesion of society, as I said in my prior post. A case like this basically destroys the system in the name of avoiding harm to a single individual.
I thought about ignoring this post, but I might as well throw my humble hat in if there’s any demand for Christian entertainment in 2026.
I’m still shadowbanned, so for my frens and mutuals out there, one like equals 1 push-up. One retweet equals 5. A review equals 100.
Very special Content Minded podcast episode tomorrow on the AI encyclical with Brother Lunk, we talk about many issues surrounding Magnifica Humanitas, stay tuned.
40K Is Not a Dystopia - We Are | @Kingbingo_
Support us by signing up to our website for as little as £5 a month and access our entire Premium catalogue: https://t.co/9PKC2mvL0y
Warhammer 40K Redditors take the setting entirely too seriously. Space King is great because it strips down and accentuates what is great about 40K. Space King celebrates absurd boyish power fantasy and winks at the audience instead of wallowing in the muck of introspection and messy satire
Praise be to Space King!
Bro… a million dollars in 2 hours… thank you boys. Just further proof you don’t need Hollywood to make world class content.
Just a legion of spergs with a dream. That’s you 🫶
Novara Media, one of the biggest leftist channels on YouTube, uploaded an interview of a guy praising multiculturalism.
I can't find one positive comment. There's a reason so many leftist politicians are suddenly trying to sound moderate on this issue now. Keep pushing.
You need to listen to the Last Picture Shows Film Festival podcast. Last Things/Kinopolitics is one of my favorite guys and yet the algorithms never show me what he's up to. Gotta spread the word.
@KinoPolitics https://t.co/bVLiunGEzq
In ancient literature, dragons were a great and terrible monster. They represented Boomers. Dragons symbolized geriatric, illegitimate political authority which refused to circulate land, wealth, and status to young men. The dragon is an ancient monster sitting on a vast pile of treasure and doing nothing with it. Knights slayed dragons and reclaimed kingdoms, recaptured virgins, and plundered treasure. This symbolized the destruction of the old Boomer Regime of economic stagnation, negative-sum parasitic rent-extraction, and political suppression... replaced by a new era. These landless knights were feudal Incels, carving out territory at the end of a sword; that's why they rescue a virgin princess.