Nathan Kipp

license custom spray operator, truck driver, mechanic, welder.Helping our customers produce high quality crops @silvercreekag

[Nathan Kipp @KippNathan]

@BaumanFb 👍👍😎

[🇨🇦 Antonio Tweets @AntonioTweets2]

Mark Carney,

This is not a polite letter; this is a full blown reckoning from a furious Canadian people who have had enough. While you and your Liberal cronies scheme and consolidate power, real Canadians are being destroyed. Our country is on its knees, and your smug success in the face of our suffering is nothing short of a national betrayal.
Mothers weep in grocery aisles over prices you helped create. Fathers grind themselves into exhaustion only to see their homes and dreams stolen by the inflation and taxes you refuse to control. All while you feast on luxury and treat our national treasury like your personal slush fund. Remember your damn place. You are a public servant... nothing more. We are your employers. We pay your salary. We fund your jets, your lavish inflight meals, and your elite lifestyle. You were not hired to rule over us, censor us, lecture us, or manage us like obedient subjects. You were hired to serve us. We never voted for this. Canadians did not hand this Liberal government a majority at the ballot box. This so called “majority” was stolen through shady backroom deals, not earned through honest democracy. That is not how our system works, it is a corrupt hijacking of the people’s will, and we reject it completely. You were brought in promising to fix trade and the economy, yet you’ve spent your time auditioning for globalist stages, pushing Agenda 2030 experiments that no Canadian ever authorized, and selling out our sovereignty to international elites. We never agreed to half a million dollars wasted on luxury travel while families can’t afford basic food or keep a roof over their heads. You have betrayed us. You have failed catastrophically. And your arrogance has finally awakened a sleeping giant. Enough is enough. We want our money back. We want our sovereignty back. We want our freedoms back. We want our country back. You may have spent years in London and Davos, but you clearly don’t know who we are. Canadians are polite, but we are not weak. We are patient, but our patience is gone. We are fighters, free thinkers, and builders who refuse to be exploited any longer by an entitled Liberal elite that looks down on us from private jets. The time for quiet frustration is dead and buried. This is a national emergency.
We are calling on every single Canadian... from coast to coast to coast... to RISE UP! Look this 'illegitimate government' straight in the eye, and roar... NO MORE! No more reckless spending crushing us with inflation.
No more secrecy hiding your corruption.
No more backroom deals stealing our democracy.
No more treating hard working citizens like cash cows and inconveniences. You do not deserve a golden pension for this treasonous failure. You deserve accountability... real uncompromising accountability from the people you’ve betrayed. OUR NATIONAL DEBT IS ABOUT TO REACH 2.5 TRILLION DOLLARS! STOP!
This is your final notice. We are angry. We are united. We are persistent as hell. We will not stop, we will not back down, and we will not rest until justice is served and Canada is ripped from the hands of those destroying it and returned to the people who actually built it and pay for it. Our elbows are up with rage, not to serve your pathetic slogans!Share this everywhere.
Flood the internet. Make the halls of power tremble. We are taking Canada back! RIGHT NOW.
#TakeCanadaBack #EnoughIsEnough #CarneyOut #LiberalCorruption #BackroomDeals #Agenda2030Exposed #CanadaFirst #FireTheLiberals #CanadianReckoning #NoMore

This is was written by: RoyStephenson 🇨🇦👌

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Excellent point

[Kirk Lubimov @KirkLubimov]

Holly! Did Jordan Peterson ever had Mark Carney pinned.

Must watch.

"His international career has collapsed in failure. So now where is he? Might as well go to Canada.
You can tell Canadians you are an outsiders and there will be some kind of economic revolution...you can do that while lying about your actual goals; which are net zero."

Absolutely nailed it.

[Marc Nixon @MarcNixon24]

EMBARRASSING

CTV claimed removing all taxes on gasoline would cause inflation to explode 🤯

Because of the increase in demand for gasoline

Pierre Poilievre was SHOCKED
AND I DON’T BLAME HIM

WHAT A TERRIBLE INTERVIEW CTV

[The Husky @Mr_Husky1]

I was standing in my yard, clutching a jar of almond butter like it was some kind of shield, when the code enforcement truck pulled up. The officer didn’t reach for anything dramatic—just clicked his pen. And there I was at sixty-eight, back aching, about to be cited for the “crime” of being a neighbor.

My name is Eleanor. I spent thirty-five years running a hospital cafeteria, feeding people through every kind of day and every kind of struggle. After I retired, life got quieter—cross-stitch, coffee, and conversations with my late husband’s photo on the hallway table.

Then one chilly morning, everything changed.

I saw a little girl—maybe ten—digging half-eaten chips out of a trash bag next door. When she looked up, she wasn’t embarrassed… she was scared. That kind of fear stays with you.

I offered her a muffin. She ran.

But I couldn’t unsee it.

That night, I realized if I wanted to help, it couldn’t come with questions or attention. It had to be simple. Quiet. No judgment.

So the next morning, I dragged out my husband’s old wooden trunk, set it by the sidewalk, and wrote:

“Give what you can. Take what you need.”

I filled it with oatmeal, crackers, fruit, and a few jars of jam.

By the end of the day, it was empty.

So I filled it again.

And then something beautiful happened—people started giving back. Milk showed up. Diapers. Notes from neighbors just trying to make it through the week.

It became “The Giving Trunk.”

It wasn’t charity—it was community.

Until the city stepped in.

A letter came. Then a visit. “Unsanitary.” “Nuisance.” “Wrong element.” They gave me 48 hours to remove it or face fines I couldn’t afford.

So I took it down.

That night, I posted a message saying it was over.

But it wasn’t.

The next morning, I opened my door and froze.

My yard was empty—but the street wasn’t.

There were boxes, tables, shelves, baskets—at every single house. Food lined the sidewalks up and down the block. My neighbors had turned the entire street into what I started alone.

The officer came back. So did the councilman.

The councilman demanded tickets.

The officer looked around… then quietly closed his pen.

“Sir,” he said, “this is just a neighborhood yard sale.”

He set down a case of water.

“Everything’s priced at zero.”

And just like that… there was nothing they could do.

That afternoon, I saw the little girl again. This time, she didn’t take anything. She left something behind.

“My mom got her hours back,” she said. “It’s our turn now.”

And that’s when it hit me—

Kindness doesn’t stop when it’s told to.

It spreads.

You don’t need permission to care. You don’t need approval to show up for people.

Start small. Start where you are.

Because when neighbors take care of each other, it becomes something bigger than rules.

It becomes unstoppable.

[Jinglai He 🇨🇦 @JinglaiHe]

Pierre Poilievre says Mark Carney is WRONG to suggest that Canada should abandon its special friendship with the US in favour of a new world order.

He says that the US will always be our largest customer and that we must secure a deal.

This is what a true leader sounds like.

[Dave W. Palmer, CD @Blue22Dave]

ONE BRAVE ONTARIO JUDGE SAID THIS, AND IT SHOULD STOP EVERY CANADIAN IN THEIR TRACKS

This came straight out of a Canadian courtroom, from an actual judge.

Antonio Skarica, sitting on the Ontario Superior Court of Justice, just put the entire system on blast.

He said the quiet part out loud.

He called Canada’s justice system an “inflection point” and asked a question that should make every Canadian stop and think:

Who are we prioritizing… the victim, or the offender?

A Nigerian university student, identified in reporting as Osemeir, targeted a Canadian woman. He extorted her. He shared her intimate images. He left her living in what the judge described as “constant fear.”

That’s not minor. That’s not a slap-on-the-wrist situation. That’s someone’s life being torn apart.

Now here’s where it gets uncomfortable.

The Crown, the prosecutors, were looking for a sentence of two years less a day.

Why does that matter?

Because under Canada’s Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, once you hit a sentence of two years or more, it can trigger serious immigration consequences, including deportation and loss of appeal rights.

So that one-day difference isn’t small. It’s everything.
On the other side, the defense wasn’t even asking for jail time. They were pushing for a conditional discharge, which would have allowed him to stay in Canada.

The judge saw exactly what was happening. He didn’t ignore it. He addressed it directly.

He said, "If decisions are being influenced by immigration consequences, if sentences are being shaped not just by the crime, but by what might happen after, then we’re creating a system that’s no longer consistent."

His words point to something bigger:

A system where outcomes can start to look different depending on who’s standing in front of the court.

And this isn’t just one judge speaking out.

A judge in Quebec, Antoine Piché, raised the same issue, saying prosecutors are sometimes proposing lighter sentences or discharges for non-citizens specifically because of the risk of deportation.

He warned that this creates what he called an “unnecessary two-tier system.”

Two different tracks of justice. Not based on the crime, but based on the consequences tied to immigration status.
Now before people start twisting this into something it’s not, this isn’t about ignoring rights, and it’s not about going after people because of where they’re from.

This is about something much simpler.

Consistency.

If the same crime doesn’t lead to the same kind of outcome, people are going to notice. And when they notice, they start losing trust.

Because for the victim, none of these legal layers matter.

They care about one thing, did justice actually get done?

And when even judges inside the system are publicly saying, “we’re at a breaking point,” that’s not something you brush off.

That’s a warning.

Not from me.

From inside the system itself.

So Wake Up Canada, we must all stand behind those who are showing us the truth in real time.

[J∅kër Kîng 👑 @j0ker937]

Let's be honest, when a manufacturer knows that got you by the short hairs, they're going to tug that wallet as often & as hard as they can.
With that said, @JohnDeere definitely got their money from this poor farmer.
I cannot believe how much he had to pay for that part.

[Brew Debate Cafe @BrewDebate]

@mario4thenorth Any MP considering crossing the floor should first hold open town hall meetings with their constituents to openly discuss the move and seek direct feedback. Democracy demands accountability to the voters who elected them—not backroom deals. What do you think? #CDNPoli

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

🚨 BREAKING: A Liberal MP sent this text to Conservative MP Billy Morin today:

“Wondering if u ever had any reflections on what it would mean or wish to explore the dark side… We do want to grow our caucus to 7 preferably 8.”

Read that again.

“The dark side.”

That’s a sitting government MP, texting an elected opposition member, asking him to abandon the people who voted for him.

Not because of policy.

Not because of principle.

Because they want to hit a NUMBER.

7 preferably 8.

They’re shopping for MPs like they’re filling a baseball team roster.

Morin said NO.

He called it a “shameless power grab in the face of democracy.”

He’s right.

5 MPs have already crossed.

Globe reported 8 more being courted.

Canadians voted for a MINORITY government.

Carney’s team is in the text messages of opposition MPs trying to get a majority Canadians never gave him.

THE LIBERALS TURNED CANADA INTO A BANANA REPUBLIC.

[JayGen 𝕏 er🇨🇦 @JayGenXer]

🚨 ELLIS ROSS JUST EXPOSED THE ULTIMATE BETRAYAL OF CANADIAN DEMOCRACY 🇨🇦

Floor-crossing MPs aren’t “strategic.”
They’re selling out their own beliefs for power.

Total abandonment of personal integrity.
Individual conviction gone — replaced by transactional greed to be on the “winning side.”

The seat belongs to the PEOPLE of the riding — NOT the politician.

When voters watch an MP get bought and paid for, they stop believing democracy even exists.

That’s not just wrong.

That’s a DANGEROUS threat to the stability of our entire country.

Ellis Ross nailed it.

If you’re sick of Ottawa insiders treating your vote like a bargaining chip, RT + reply:
ENOUGH.

Put CANADIANS FIRST — or get the hell out.

#canpoli #CanadianIndigenous #Indigenous #FloorCrossing #DemocracyBetrayed #CanadaFirst

[Vesper @vesperdigital]

Rebuttal!
Vassy, that wasn’t an interview it was a Masterclass in manipulative narrative framing. From loaded questions to presuppositions, it was honestly kinda gross to watch. I'd like to break it down, to show what you're doing, since I work in PR. @shuvmajumdar @VassyKapelos

[The Carney Files 🇨🇦 | Sourced @TheCarneyFiles]

A lot of people in these comments are throwing insults for saying Carney wasn't elected.

None of them have pointed out a single fact that's wrong.

So let me be very clear.

I never said it was illegal. I never said that he was the first to become Prime Minister without being an MP.

I said he was “the first Prime Minister in Canadian history to have never been elected to public office”.

And the bigger picture is the part nobody in the comments wants to touch 👇

The Carney government was about to fall.

All three opposition parties — Conservatives, NDP, Bloc — said they'd vote non-confidence.

Conservatives had a 24-point lead 📉

The government was done.

So Trudeau prorogued Parliament. Shut it down. Suspended democracy so the confidence vote couldn't happen.

CBC confirmed it: "the Liberals will avoid a confidence vote."

Then during that suspension, 0.38% of Canadians chose Carney as Liberal leader.

Then Trudeau — the man they had no confidence in — advised the GG to appoint Carney as PM 👑

Same party. Same government. Same Salesman.

You cannot claim he had the confidence of Parliament when they suspended Parliament specifically to avoid testing it.

And since then? He has fooled this country at every turn 👇

📄 Said he'd "axe the tax." Scrapped the one you could see. Kept the hidden one — 7¢/litre. Zero rebates. Industrial carbon tax still climbing to $170/tonne.

📄 Said he'd fix the $390M slush fund. "Replaced" it with a $5B version. Same minister. Bigger budget.

📄 His ethics screen covers 5% of Brookfield. The Ethics Commissioner said under oath his future pay is tied to Brookfield's success.

📄 Said he'd stand up to China. Flew to Beijing. Dropped EV tariffs from 100% to 6.1%. Slave labour imports from Xinjiang grew from $59M to $601M. Canada blocked 2 shipments. The US blocked over 1,000.

📄 Campaigned on 380,000 immigrants. Real number is 765,000+. The UN called the program "a breeding ground for contemporary forms of slavery."

📄 $35.8M in taxpayer money went to companies his wife advises.

📄 Appointed a BlackRock executive to run international trade. BlackRock and Brookfield are co-investors.

📄 5 MPs crossed the floor with no by-elections. 74% of Canadians across ALL parties say that's wrong.

📄 Now he's personally choosing the next Governor General — the person who signs his laws into effect. No vote. No public input.

This is what you're defending.

Read that list again. Slowly.

Then tell me which one is wrong. I'll correct it publicly.

And this is just what fit in one post.

The pinned post on my profile has the full picture. Every thread. Every source. Every dollar traced.

Then come back and tell me why you're still defending him.

Call me what you want. The facts don’t care 🇨🇦

#StandOnGuard #StandOnGuardCanada

[Élie Cantin-Nantel @elie_mcn]

I don’t think most of the chattering class understands quite how damaging floor crossers are to democracy.

These floor crossings will change the outcome of the 2025 election and invalidate the democratic decision Canadians made to elect a minority government.

This sends the message to voters that their vote doesn’t matter.

And when we get to a place where voters feel democracy is illegitimate, we enter a very dark place.

[Melanie In Saskatchewan @saskatchewan_in]

Cross the Floor. End Your Career.

Dear Members of Parliament Allegedly Considering Crossing the Floor...

Recently it was revealed that there are up to another ten MPs thinking about crossing the floor to @MarkJCarney's Liberals.

If floor crossing is so principled, why are you afraid to ask the people who elected you first?

There is a moment before a decision like this where everything slows down. Not publicly. Out there, it’s noise, talking points, strategic leaks, careful denials. “Rumours.” Up to ten of you, apparently. Unconfirmed. Unproven.

And yet, specific enough that it feels less like speculation and more like a test balloon.

But internally, it’s different. Quiet. Focused. Because before you act, you already know what this is, and more importantly, you know how it will be seen.

Strip Away the Language...

You were not elected as a free agent drifting between ideologies. You were elected under a banner, a platform, a set of commitments that voters used to make a decision. They did not vote for you in theory. They voted for you in context.

Remove that context and you are not evolving. You are overriding.

You are taking tens of thousands of votes and retroactively rewriting them without consent. You can call it pragmatism. You can call it stability. You can call it doing what’s necessary.

Your constituents will not use any of those words. They will use one, maybe two…

Betrayal. Traitor.

The Voice You’re Trying Not to Hear...

That hesitation you feel right now is not indecision. It’s recognition. Because somewhere beneath the strategy, beneath the conversations and the pressure, there is a very simple understanding pressing in on you.

This crosses a line.

You can rationalize it. You can bury it under language about national interest. You can tell yourself this is bigger than your riding. But if that were true, you wouldn’t be avoiding the one step that would make it legitimate.

Asking them.

The Question You Refuse to Put to Your Voters...

If this is so defensible, so necessary, so clearly the right move, why won’t you ask your constituents first? Why not resign, sit as an independent, and run again under the banner you now claim reflects your beliefs?

Is it because you already know the answer?
Is it because the people who elected you would not follow you?
Or is it because the idea of hearing “no” is so corrosive to your sense of self that you’d rather rewrite their vote than risk your ego?

If this is leadership, why does it require this much avoidance to function?

What You Think You’re Securing...

You may believe this is a move toward relevance, toward influence, toward a longer career orbiting power. It isn’t.

It is a branding decision.

You will become known, permanently, as the one who crossed. The one who asked for trust and then treated it like something they stepped in and couldn’t scrape off their shoe fast enough. The one who decided that proximity to power mattered more than fidelity to the people who put you there.

That reputation does not fade. It hardens.

It follows you into nomination meetings where hands don’t go up. Into interviews where questions linger a second longer than they should. Into rooms where your name is met with a pause instead of support.

And you’ll feel it.

Not loudly.
Quietly.
Consistently.

And Here Is the Part You’re Ignoring...

Your new allies will never fully trust you. They will welcome you, yes. They will use your vote. They will count you, quote you, parade you as proof of momentum.

But they will always know what you did.

You crossed once.
Which means you can cross again.

So what exactly are you to them? A trusted colleague, or a convenient number that comes with an expiry date?

Because you don’t become indispensable this way. You become temporary.

Not a partner.
A placeholder.

What You Are Actually Participating In...

Let’s remove the last layer of insulation.

This is not about thoughtful realignment. It is not about evolving political identity. This is about manufacturing a majority that voters did not grant, using individual ambition as the mechanism to bypass collective consent.

You are not stabilizing governance.

You are short-circuiting it.

If this is democracy, why does it need to be done around the voters instead of through them?

There Is an Honest Path. You’re Avoiding It...

If you truly believe your position has changed, there is a clean, defensible, democratic way to proceed. Resign. Sit as an independent. Run again under your new banner. Let your constituents decide whether they endorse your shift.

Anything less is not courage.
It is convenience, wearing a borrowed moral argument.

The Ending You Haven’t Considered...

You are likely telling yourself this will settle, that voters will move on, that memory is short and cycles reset. That this becomes a footnote.

It won’t.

Because this is not a policy disagreement. This is a character decision made in full view. And voters do not forget those.

So ask yourself one final question before you take the step you are clearly being encouraged to take. And do it with a semblance os self respect for who you were when you were elected, instead of settling to be "that guy."

If you cannot defend this decision directly to the people who elected you, what exactly are you defending it for?

And when this moment is over, when the noise fades and the next election arrives, do you really believe they will forget what you showed them about who you are?

Or are you betting your entire career that they won’t care enough to remember?

Final Word...

You knew what you were asking for when you ran. You knew what that vote meant, and you accepted it anyway. So don’t stand there now and pretend the rules changed or the stakes shifted. They didn’t. You did.

And if you follow through on this, don’t dress it up as anything noble. It’s not complicated. It’s the same logic as an unfaithful spouse who thinks they’ve found something better and convinces themselves the original commitment no longer matters.

You made a promise, and you’re breaking it because something else caught your eye. That’s not politics. That’s character. And once people see that clearly, they don’t forget it, they don’t forgive it, and they certainly don’t reward it.

Melanie in Saskatchewan

👇🏻
https://t.co/dWBTCcpSA7
👇🏻
https://t.co/ApiK4nzuxp
#cdnpoli #ThinkTwice

[Ron Butler @ronmortgageguy]

Canada's Finance Minister Champagne Woke Up Last Week & Said To The Woman He Was Sleeping With: HEY! Do You Work At High Speed Rail?

Because it sure as hell looks like everyone was surprised about this

Why didn't anyone know he recused himself BEFORE?

I have thoughts:

[L. Wayne Mathison @WayneMathison]

I am disgusted, and I am not going to dress it up with polite Ottawa language.

Marilyn Gladu crossed from the Conservatives to Mark Carney’s Liberals on April 8, 2026, saying constituents want “serious leadership” and “a real plan to build a stronger and more independent Canadian economy.” Her move gives the Liberals 171 seats, one short of the 172 needed for a majority.

That is exactly why people do not buy the noble script.

This is how Ottawa usually works. The speech is about conscience.

The reality is about power.

Suddenly the language gets soft, patriotic, and lofty right when the political math gets useful. We are asked to believe an MP was hit by a lightning bolt of principle at the exact moment her switch strengthens the governing party and brings it within one seat of majority control. Convenient does not begin to cover it.

Gladu says this is about leadership and collaboration. Fine. Then let voters decide whether they agree. That is the part these people always skip. They act as if a personal change of heart magically rewrites the contract with the public. It does not. People did not vote only for Marilyn Gladu the individual. They voted for a Conservative MP, a Conservative platform, and a Conservative opposition role. Crossing the floor without first seeking a new mandate may be legal, but it feels like a bait-and-switch because that is exactly what it is.

And spare me the line about “doing the best thing” for the riding. Every floor crosser says some version of that. It is the oldest detergent in the political cupboard. It is meant to wash ambition into service. What it really signals is this: I think my judgment now matters more than the basis on which you elected me.

That is where the anger comes from.

Voters are already drowning in managed language, staged sincerity, and plastic promises. Trust in politics is weak because people keep seeing the same pattern. Politicians campaign one way, govern another, then call the switch “leadership.” They wrap self-interest in national purpose and hope the flag covers the fingerprints.

What makes this worse is the timing. Carney publicly welcomed Gladu into Liberal caucus the same day, and the result is not symbolic. It materially strengthens the government’s position in the House. This is not some minor personal journey. It changes parliamentary leverage. It changes committee numbers, confidence calculations, and the balance of power.

So yes, I’m pissed.

I am pissed because voters are treated like props in a story written after the fact. I am pissed because party labels suddenly matter a great deal during elections and apparently not at all when power is on offer. I am pissed because people who were sent to oppose Liberal policy can simply walk across the aisle and help entrench it, then expect applause for being “constructive.”

And there is another detail that makes this smell even worse. Local reporting says that in January, Gladu had advocated for byelections when MPs switch parties. If that report is accurate, then this is not just opportunism. It is opportunism with a side order of hypocrisy.

That is the real issue here. Not whether floor crossing is technically allowed. Not whether Ottawa insiders can invent a respectable sentence for it. The real issue is whether voters still mean anything once the election is over.

My view is simple. If you want to switch parties, resign and run again. Go back to the people. Make your case honestly. Ask for a fresh mandate under the new banner. Anything less might be lawful, but it is not clean. It tells voters their consent is temporary, conditional, and easily bypassed once the machinery of power starts humming.

That is why this disgusts me.

Because democracy is not only about counting seats. It is about keeping faith with the people who gave you one.

[Mario Zelaya @mario4thenorth]

🚨 BREAKING

THREE MONTHS AGO, Marilyn Gladu signed a petition saying MPs who cross the floor should be FORCED into an immediate by-election.

Today, she crossed the floor to the Liberals.

Sarnia-Lambton gave her 40,365 votes as a Conservative.

53.3% of the riding.

A nearly 12,000 vote margin over the Liberal.

By her OWN standard from January, she should be calling the by-election right now.

This is past the point of hypocrisy.

This is fraud.