Chester

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@ShubuhatArchive @MakiTheSalafi I have already responded to it many times. The scenario was adressinf divorce. Was her reason for divorce because he beat her or because his impotency and they both swore oaths so you have to address that

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@ShubuhatArchive @WESTBEAST171171 @MakiTheSalafi Ibn Abbas, Imam Nawawi, Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen, Ibn Kathir, Hasan Al-Basri, Imam Al-Razi, and Al-Qurtubi and many more all disagree and explain that it means no harm or injury. And the 10 lashes is for hudud, not what you are talking about. Why are you just lying

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@ShubuhatArchive @WESTBEAST171171 @MakiTheSalafi He condemned beatings that leave bruises and injuries (Sunan Ibn Majah 1851) and granted separation for such cases (Sunan Abi Dawud 2228). You are lying. Her main grievance was actually his impotency, which they both swore contrary oaths on.

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@WESTBEAST171171 @MakiTheSalafi And if she wanted a divorce for harm, it'd be granted. But she wanted to remarry her ex after a triple talaq, which required consummation first. Since she couldn't prove impotence, her case failed. Abi Dawud 2228 & Bukhari 5276 prove the Prophet granted divorces for abuse.

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@WESTBEAST171171 @MakiTheSalafi Why did you cut out the last part. Typical quote mining she said “But he is impotent” so that wasn’t the main important issue. And second he had already said giving bruises wasn’t wasn’t allowed (Sunan Ibn Majah 1851) so they both knew it.

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@getman900 @DaveWright1n3b @Omaruncovered You lost Jerusalem back to the Christian (Brits) and they gave it to the Jews👍

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@WESTBEAST171171 @MakiTheSalafi A nudge causing sudden discomfort or surprise doesn't magically turn a reprimand into "domestic abuse." You are desperately changing the definition of words. Aisha herself explicitly stated in multiple sahih texts: "The Prophet never hit a woman or a servant." Case closed

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@WESTBEAST171171 @MakiTheSalafi That wasn’t the only reason you literally read the main reason she wanted for divorce and you are still lying… When cases like this are brought you adress the main reason right ahead. When two people swear on oaths that is the main concern

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@WESTBEAST171171 @MakiTheSalafi That wasn’t her main reason for wanting divorce that was secondary, so what do you address first, the primary or secondary reason? She could have a reasonable ground to divorce him by abuse but she wanted to go back to her ex and he explained how.

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@WESTBEAST171171 @MakiTheSalafi the Prophet didn't press because the husband immediately arrived and stated the reason. Legally, she didn't petition for harm; she explicitly demanded a divorce for impotency. When his sons proved her perjury, her fraudulent lawsuit collapsed.

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@WESTBEAST171171 @MakiTheSalafi (3/3) In Islam, falsely taking an oath by God is a grave sin. Since both swore opposite oaths, the Prophet focused on that major spiritual violation. The text already stated the reason for beating, but her divorce claim rested on impotency, which is why he addressed that.

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@astreons120 @PlainVerity @radical_mihii She literally leaned in and if you watched the original video it was a rehearsal and the kiss was part of it

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@TichLowe @lifeofgord @maerdtoof @grok is it true Chinese believed there was 360 joints. And is it true there isn’t a fixed number because we don’t know what to count as joints and 360 isn’t a fixed number we have estimates

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@Shahiyosokor @lifeofgord @maerdtoof He is illiterate not deaf… You do know information around Arabia used to pass by mouth?

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@WESTBEAST171171 @MakiTheSalafi Because that wasn’t her main complaint. She literally switched her compliant from him beating her to him being incompetent in bed. So he adressed that. They both took oaths to Allah saying contrary so he adressed that

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@halafly_ @DrMaleekk You do know Korra in 2023 was exposed by many Muslims like esjay for talking with multiple men about marriage. Maleek has a lot of dirt on Korra, he could leak it at any time.

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@khann_azan @destroysunnis @farmajoo1 He gave the timestamp go and check it out

[Chester @Kiprap346]

@Sa1aahudeen @lalamiadolan @DillyHussain88 I already proved you quote-mined Al-Halimi it was a recommendation. But even if he disagreed, it wouldn't change anything. Ibn Rushd was reporting a binding, pre-existing Ijma. Al-Halimi came way too late to break an established consensus. You are completely cooked.