@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 22/ And one trap worth knowing.
The LIT ticker on Binance is NOT @Lighter_xyz. Different project. $0.74 vs $2.21.
Sum books by ticker without checking and Lighter's liquidity comes out inflated.
I measured on Gate, Bybit, KuCoin, MEXC. Verified via exchange metadata.
The #3 perp DEX refuses to take its own token as collateral.
The #1 and #2 don't refuse.
@Lighter_xyz accepts USDC, ETH, tokenized Robinhood stock. Not LIT.
@HyperliquidX and @Aster_DEX accept theirs.
One of these designs survives the next Oct 11. ๐งต
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 21/ Caveats, because they matter.
No market caps for edgeX, GRVT, Drift โ absolute depth only, no normalization.
Paradex, Extended, Backpack, Pacifica, Ostium: no exchange-listed token to measure.
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 18/ Tier list, 2 of 2
๐ก HYPE โ worst combo on paper. In practice the only one that survived โ56% and held better than outside venues on Oct 10.
๐ข LIT, EDGEX, GRVT โ token isn't collateral
๐ข DYDX, GMX โ 89% and 100% float, dilution done
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 16/ Size does not protect you.
HYPE is 22x bigger than LIT by market cap.
Relatively thinner book. Far more dependent on its own token as collateral.
Bigger is not sturdier.
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 15/ Why float beats depth as a signal.
Low float means the supply is still coming. And it lands in the same thin book a liquidator has to dump collateral into.
@dYdX and @GMX_IO don't have that problem anymore. They already lived through it.
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 13/ @DriftProtocol wires a lending market directly into the exchange. Spot borrow against perp collateral.
But book depth there is $31k.
Mostly an academic question.
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 12/ That is the exact @CurveFinance architecture from 2024.
The one that liquidated the founder for $140M, dropped CRV 30% in two days, and left bad debt STILL uncleared as of April 2026.
Same shape. Younger. Untested.
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 11/ Who's most exposed here? Not Hyperliquid.
@JupiterExchange.
Own lending protocol โ Jupiter Lend, $873M.
Own stablecoin โ JupUSD, accepted as collateral since January.
Own token. Own lending. Own stable.
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 10/ @avantisfi has the most honest design in the set.
AVNT staked in the Security Module can be slashed up to 20% in a shortfall.
The token isn't collateral. It's a declared shock absorber.
You know you're paying for the failure. You don't discover it via liquidation.
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 9/ @grvt_io went furthest.
First to wire external yield straight into trading collateral. ONE Balance: margin earns up to 11% via Aave while still backing positions.
Their collateral is external yield-bearing assets. Not their token.
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 7/ So what does LIT actually do?
Governance, staking for LP access, fee discounts, buybacks, burns.
$17.9M bought back since launch, $14.6M of it in Q1 2026.
15.5M LIT burned โ 6.3% of circulating.
Real money. Just not load-bearing collateral.
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 6/ @Lighter_xyz: 6.4 bps.
Twice as deep, relative to size. At a $553M cap with 25% float.
A venue 3x smaller than Aster runs a book twice as deep โ and refuses to build its collateral system on its own token.
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 5/ Now the number that surprised me.
I summed every bid within 2% of mid across venues, then divided by market cap.
HYPE: 3.0 bps
ASTER: 3.0 bps
Hyperliquid is 7.6x larger. Identical relative book thinness.
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 4/ @Aster_DEX โ #2. ~20% share. $41.7B in 30 days.
ASTER cap: $1.61B. Float 34%.
ASTER is accepted as margin on Aster itself.
Collateral and traded asset: the same token again.
@Lighter_xyz@HyperliquidX@Aster_DEX 3/ @HyperliquidX โ #1. Roughly a third of all perp DEX volume. ~$196B in 30 days.
HYPE cap: $12.3B.
Float: 22%. Lowest in the set.
And 83% of every deposit in HyperLend is HYPE in three different wrappers.