Kit Controversy

here you'll find many controversial topics with my own personal take. #Luke2236 #Article4Section4 #AllAmendments #NoPartyBias

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@WhiteGirl1776 this is why you stay strapped friends, cause the only one who can save you in the moment is you.

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@tremulant08 @paleochristcon as I said before, clearly your intellect is far too dizzying for someone such as I to be able to explain logically why you're wrong.

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@Boethius1100 @paleochristcon this is only part of the story, if you break it down by religiosity and being married or not it shows a very different graph.

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@tremulant08 @paleochristcon ahh yes, the midwit response of "you say you want this stuff to stop, yet you speak on it so you can convince people it's bad. that means you're part of the problem." truly your intellect is far too dizzying for a logical refutation to be effective.

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@wokestalinism I have read the theory, now what?

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@RealRichWilkins just curious, you prefer they wear the uniform and write on it in protest to keep the game going? not saying I disagree, though I prefer the rangers' take on it, just don't do a pride night and let people do what they want as they want. saves you from both of these situations.

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@TylerMcMasters4 @Johngo_Fett94 @emkenobi @jimmyfallon he was found civilly liable for rape, which has a much lower burden of evidence (it's mostly just what the jury can be convinced is "likely"). it was never criminal because there wasn't enough evidence. so yea, mostly just vibes it seems like based on what I'm reading.

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@imstillscottish @ThePosieParker @Variety I imagine people would be more likely to listen to that if Charlie were still here to say that. sadly he's not, and people often get more radicalized when they believe that talking is no longer beneficial.

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@Sunken_Demon @PhantomArc_ @paleochristcon doing it like that doesn't provide proof for the audience to know what the definition really was

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@PhantomArc_ @paleochristcon if you can't agree on a definition or someone contradicts the definition they gave over and over again that will slow the debate down yes. people also like to stay vague with their definitions so they can try and move away or dodge being pinned down on logical entailments.

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@nincopoops @paleochristcon I can only remember the one who got famous after debating Kirk, she debated Andrew twice. can't remember her name though.

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@JamesLarson47 @DavoustBaldPate @alexinsix silence is always telling, and more interesting sometimes than a response.

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@JamesLarson47 @DavoustBaldPate @alexinsix or again are you just attributing motive because he said something along the line of "I disagree with their lifestyle"?

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@JamesLarson47 @DavoustBaldPate @alexinsix what reasons were those? did he actually say why or are you attributing motive?

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@JamesLarson47 @DavoustBaldPate @alexinsix what's that? choosing to wear his regular ball cap and not the one they wanted him to? why is that a lack of integrity?

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@SolarEnergyBTC I agree, but we should be working to limit voting more than that. a really good start would be only those who are a net benefit to the tax system can vote. if you take out more than you put in, you can't vote.

[Kit Controversy @KitControversy]

@SolarEnergyBTC probably, but at least we fixed our voting maps first.