@lifeisPandC Its kinda interesting how the Brahmins have controlled the narrative. South Indian Brahmins are like 47% S-Indian on average on HW but somehow they manipulate qpadm to show that they're somehow only 36-37% Onge-like on avg. very odd
@Pajeet_landd@padh39892 The runs on the left are utter nonsense. How are Punjabi Brahmins 20+% less AASI than Telugu Brahmins when their HW ASI values are 15% apart? You have nothing to prove that Telugu Brahmins are 43-44% AASI.
@Pajeet_landd@padh39892@lifeisPandC Your obtusity is appalling. You’re comparing qpAdm runs on a given model to a G25 Illustrative run known to inflate AASI by eating up other components. At least standardize the tool you’re using to compare.
@lifeisPandC@padh39892@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd I disagree though that 50+ SI Brahmins form a genuine cluster. That kit you keep citing is obviously very AASI-shifted for a SIB, yet I keep seeing accounts on here claim it is typical. I haven't seen any other SIB kit with 50+ SI.
@lifeisPandC@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd And what I also don't understand is why your claim about Purvanchal region being undersampled isn't also applicable to SW Brahmins. There is a Shivalli kit from Udupi with <41 SI, do you really think Havyakas/Shivallis/Nambudiris couldn't possibly go under 40 SI?
@Pajeet_landd@lifeisPandC That is IllustrativeDNA. Totally different from HarappaWorld. Why are you posting in this thread if you don't even know the difference?
@lifeisPandC@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd You had asked for high SNP SW Brahmin kits to justify my claim that that Nambudiri with 44.66 SI was not particularly Western-shifted for his region, so I shared all the high SNP kits that I had with you in DMs. But you blocked me.
@lifeisPandC@padh39892@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd I don't give two craps about Rajputs. I don't think any of the users in this thread did until you came along and started posting incessantly about them.
@lifeisPandC@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd Look, I don't have anything against you. Never did. I actually admire your efforts to challenge bias in South Asian genetics spaces, which has held us back from understanding our communities better. I just don't understand why you keep dodging conversation with me.
@lifeisPandC@Pajeet_landd@Gonetoosoon23 Even if we take his "estimate" of SIB's AASI, you get a split of 42-15-42 AASI-Steppe-Farmer. Just as much Farmer as AASI. I only brought up other communities here because his original comment was a comparison to North Indian UCs.
@lifeisPandC@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd "Obsessed"? Rich coming from a guy like you, whose instinct is to block those who try to challenge his claims with evidence.
@Gonetoosoon23@Pajeet_landd@lifeisPandC That's fine as long as the same logic is applied to all communities. Typical range of East UP/Bihar Brahmins should be 36-39 AASI. Gangetic Rajputs would be 38-42 AASI. And Punjabi Brahmins, 28-32 AASI.
@Ahavamalla@K35jap NO. We UK Kannadigas share FAR more in common with the coastal peoples of Konkan and Tulunadu than we do with interior Kannadigas. If you were actually a UK Kannadiga, you'd never put the interests of an arbitrary state over those of the people of Karavali.
@Pajeet_landd@lifeisPandC First off, that image is not of HarappaWorld. The South Indian component in that calculator is meaningless unless we can compare it with other castes. And did you even click on the link and try to find her HW? I did it for you, you're welcome. 47% ASI.