Abu William reads a hadith in Arabic which translates:
"If you were to come to the people of Oman, they would have neither reviled you nor beaten you."
@SpiritualSalafi Am curious how the Catholic Theology Teacher would react to know that the scholars of her own church hold her goto "I AM" proof as an later interpolation. ๐ค
https://t.co/O9C6HXtPcy
@Smali2542965211@smile2jannah Idiot. When you've been afflicted with such a diminished intellect, why comment at all?
As if you're remotely capable of comprehending the point you think you're responding too. ๐
@DaughterLeslie@pippaisright Follow the argument...
As per the original post, the attack had nothing to do with any mosque. The attack is wrong and rejected by Islam, whatever the religion of the perpetrators.
Your own godlessness is irrelevant.
Christians don't follow religion like it's an important thing except countless tens of millions the world over who do.
Muslims take religion as a way of life except countless tens of millions the world over who don't.
For a example of a devout Christian and Muslim...
https://t.co/FIaEe0wzB8
@DaughterLeslie@pippaisright Right. If they are Muslim, then they are not following their religion.
And if I am not teaching them, then Jimmy Saville was still a Christian and you did not teach him.
@DaughterLeslie@pippaisright You can see that they are "ethnic".
But Islam is not a race or ethnicity โ its an ethos, a religion.
And the religion of Islam forbids criminality, thuggary and oppression of all kinds.
@DaughterLeslie@pippaisright He did indeed get battered by masked cowards.
As for their allegiance to Islam, there's no evidence of that. Quite the contrary, in fact.
@milkedstudios@ShaykhSulaiman Prove that I blindly follow anyone, let alone MiAW.
Go ahead, bring a single citation.
You can't because you're a liar, projecting your own misguidance onto me.
The only person whom I take from without question or restriction is the Messenger of Allah ๏ทบ, see.
We admonsioned Maleek for his role in a stream and censured him directly on his live.
As for Libyano, he explicitly approved sharing the pics *he* described as porn โ something I directly confronted him with and he didn't deny.
Maybe pay better attention and fact check before commenting.
Regarding what has been disclosed about Libyano's alleged commissioning of the circulation of explicit images of another Dawah Bro's male member.
*If* true (the brother appears to be denying it), then there's little material difference between that and his earlier commissioning of the circulation of revealing images of a Christian polemicist's wife โ an act Libyano himself described as pornography.
Smut remains smut, regardless of whether the images being circulated belong to a Muslim man or a Christian woman. The immorality of the act does not change with identity.
When Dawah Bros excused and even co-signed Libyano's degenerate behaviour towards one victim, they effectively did so for all.
What is haram here does not become halal elsewhere merely because the one you seek to humiliate practices a different faith.
A pornographer is a pornographer, regardless of the religion of his interlocutor.
ุฅูููู ุงูููููู ููุฃูู ูุฑู ุจูุงููุนูุฏููู ููุงููุฅูุญูุณูุงูู ููุฅููุชูุงุกู ุฐูู ุงููููุฑูุจูููฐ ููููููููููฐ ุนููู ุงููููุญูุดูุงุกู ููุงููู ูููููุฑู ููุงููุจูุบููู ููุนูุธูููู ู ููุนููููููู ู ุชูุฐููููุฑูููู