Thabo Mbeki's presidency marked a significant shift in South African politics, primarily due to his emphasis on education and meritocracy within the ANC. Mbeki believed in placing leaders with qualifications and experience in key positions, thinking this would lead to better governance driven by data, science, and structured decision-making. However, this approach didn't sit well with everyone, especially those who had been deeply involved in the struggle against apartheid.
Many of the ANC veterans felt targeted by Mbeki's policies. They argued that their lack of formal education was due to their commitment to the freedom fight, and they believed their sacrifices entitled them to leadership roles. This group, feeling sidelined, started referring to Mbeki's supporters as "clever blacks," a term meant to criticize their perceived elitism.
Enter Jacob Zuma, who, despite lacking formal qualifications, had significant struggle credentials. His charisma and populist appeal attracted those who felt excluded by Mbeki's meritocratic stance. This faction, later known as the Radical Economic Transformation (RET) group, resisted Mbeki's policies, often dismissing them as overly complicated and inaccessible.
A major point of contention during Mbeki's presidency was his approach to HIV/AIDS. Mbeki questioned the effectiveness of ARVs and wanted scientific proof of their benefits over good nutrition. He also demanded clear evidence that HIV caused AIDS. This cautious approach was portrayed by his opponents as denialism, leading to accusations that Mbeki's policies resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths. This controversy further deepened the divisions within the ANC.
Julius Malema, a young and fiery leader in the ANC Youth League, initially supported Zuma passionately. He famously declared his loyalty to Zuma, but later expressed regret, realizing the negative impact of unqualified leadership on the country. Malema criticized the appointment of leaders without qualifications, blaming such decisions for South Africa's problems.
When Zuma took over from Mbeki, his presidency was marked by corruption and inefficiency. Unqualified officials mismanaged state institutions, and pseudo-experts with dubious credentials exploited the situation, leading to widespread looting of state resources. Many experienced professionals left the public sector for the private sector, which thrived as a result.
Cyril Ramaphosa, trusted by the business community, emerged as a leader who could restore order and professionalism within the government. His administration sought to implement the findings of the state capture report and prosecute corrupt officials. However, the RET faction, still loyal to Zuma, resisted Ramaphosa's reforms.
The RET faction continued to undermine Ramaphosa, accusing him of being a sellout and an apartheid collaborator. The Phala Phala scandal, involving allegations of money laundering, was one of many controversies used against him. Despite these challenges, Ramaphosa remained committed to his reform efforts.
The conflict within the ANC mirrored broader societal divisions in South Africa. The educated elite, who valued data and science, clashed with those who relied on populist rhetoric and conspiracy theories. This polarization has continued to shape the nation's political landscape.
Ramaphosa's efforts to clean up the system faced significant obstacles. The RET faction, feeling marginalized, formed alliances with various opposition groups to resist his reforms. The struggle for control within the ANC and the broader South African political sphere reflects ongoing tension between meritocracy and populism.
In summary, Thabo Mbeki's focus on education and meritocracy led to deep divisions within the ANC. The battle between data-driven governance and charismatic populism continues to shape South Africa's future.
Mk Party is the RET.
I hope you've found this thread helpful.
I've been building technology companies for 20 years. Follow me @adcock_brett for more.
Like/Retweet the first tweet below if you can:
Load shedding in whatever form is bad news for our ailing economy.Making it permanent for two years means that we can forget about attracting investors and we can expect other serious consequences.We are in trouble
Happy new year my Twitter friends.Please tell me what SA benefits from attending the World Economic Forum in Davos other than it being an expensive trip
So SAA will cancel most domestic flights. If it only flies between Joburg and Cape Town, does that guarantee profitability. Fellow South Africans, is there a need to keep SAA
The minister of Public Enterprises is a master of the use of decorated language.He says SAA will be given R2 billion financial assistance and not a bailout.What is the difference between financial assistance and bailout
At heart am a stokvel Child! My mom raised us and took us to school with stokvel money! She build her house& a house for my grandparents mostly with stokvel money! Stokvels are the most powerful thing ever in the black community! We can enhance them to truly do more for ourselves
@Seda_dsbd @DSBD_SA@ServiceSETA and @EDSE_programme in the final leg of stakeholder engagement on Business Development Services for 2019 which among other things focuses on soliciting inputs to the draft Business Development Services Policy and Discussion paper Business Advising