The EU "Parliament Magazine", owned by a UK-listed “data and intelligence” company, has released a hit piece against remigration, including a liberal strategy to counter it. A short rebuttal.
1. They claim the weakness of remigration is its vagueness and different interpretations. It "collapses" under scrutiny when it must be defined clearly.
But every major political concept began as a broad cultural vision before becoming policy. The left uses blanket terms like “diversity", "sustainability", “integration", and "socialism” all the time. But still these ideas shape laws & institutions. Remigration is undergoing exactly this metapolitical process.
The article confuses technical feasibility with political will. Major transformations always appear “unthinkable” at first: Brexit, border closures from 2015–2020, mass repatriations in the United States, Covid measures, etc.
If you lay the ground, you just need a formative event + a tipping point, and the unthinkable becomes reality.
2. Remigration has also long since been concretized.
The article deliberately ignores existing, serious attempts at definition.
Remigration includes:
-border protection
-repatriation of illegal migrants
-voluntary return + help to reintegrate
-reform of asylum law
-return incentives
-citizenship reforms
-assimilation policy
Within this frame, there are vivid and important debates about time & scope. This is not a weakness but a sign of life & energy.
3. Remigration is already an institutional reality.
Voluntary return programs have existed for years:
-REAG/GARP in Germany
-IOM return programs
-state reintegration initiatives
There are also diaspora programs from many Arab and African nations that encourage their lost sons to come back. The dispute is therefore not about whether remigration exists, but about its scale.
Liberal parties themselves have the real definition problem. THEIR policy is vague and extreme at the same time. They avoid the core questions:
What is "diversity" and how is it a "strength"?
How much migration can a society absorb?
Is there a valuable distinct European identity?
Is there a right to ethnocultural continuity for Europeans?
Remigration is a tool to reset and then restart the whole debate about migration & identity and ask those questions. Once people openly discuss:
demographic sovereignty, parallel societies, limits of assimilation, ethnocultural continuity, etc.,
the old interpretive framework loses its monopoly. That is why the term remigration is morally tabooized instead of rationally debated.
4. The accusation of “division” misunderstands how political paradigms evolve. Also, RW parties narrowing their definition is part of the game; that is called politics.
Radical flanks, think tanks, the Online Right, media, political parties — it is a dynamic continuum and metapolitical warfare.
Political ideas always develop through factions and internal tensions. This was true for:
socialism
liberalism
environmentalism
It will be the same for the remigration movement.
A silent majority already supports:
-repatriation of criminal migrants & rejected asylum seekers
-strict border enforcement
-stopping mass naturalization and revoking it if possible
-protection of cultural norms, ghetto laws, de-Islamization, etc.
Remigration simply unifies these moods under one strategic umbrella term.
5. Finally: The article unintentionally confirms the strategic thesis of metapolitics. First comes the term. Then a (sometimes chaotic) discourse. Then the political translation.
Only a few years ago, remigration was considered unspeakable.
Today it is discussed by parliaments, mainstream media, courts, international parties, and the "Parliament Magazine". Also, this article is feeding the hype. An idea that was truly irrelevant would not provoke a Europe-wide counter-mobilization of concerned liberals.
But it will fail and we will win.
Remigration is inevitable, because the alternative is civilizational suicide.
The main doctrine of the EU:
Old dying white people pass on the infrastructure and generational wealth of their ancestors to africans.
They want us to die, disappear and dissolve in an afroarab, postnational gangland.
Europeans are indigenous to Europe because they descend from four different populations of Hunter-Gatherers, all of which inhabited Europe during the stone age.
1. Western Hunter-Gatherers (WHG) - a genetic profile that emerged in Western Europe 15,000 years ago but which has its roots in Europe's earlier ice age populations, mainly the Epigravettian culture which emerged in South Eastern Europe 21,000 years ago, coming out of earlier Gravettian culture people which formed some 33,000 years ago.
2. Eastern Hunter-Gatherers (EHG) who formed a genetic cluster in Eastern Europe 13,000–15,000 years ago. They descended mainly from Ancient North Eurasians from Siberia who themselves descended from Upper Paleolithic Europeans of 40,000 years ago.
3. Anatolian Hunter Gatherers who learned to farm and began to colonise Europe 8000 years ago mixing with the WHG.
4. Caucasian Hunter Gatherers who first came down from the mountains to mix with EHG in South Russia some 8000 years ago, but did so again in the Eneolithic.
With such astonishing continuity and undeniably deep roots, anyone denying our indigenous status is both morally and intellectually bankrupt and should be publicly shamed.
🟥 Police Runs from Migrants in France
Dramatic footage shows French law enforcement 🇫🇷 forced to flee as migrant gangs establish control over entire urban districts.
These areas have effectively become no-go zones where the state has lost its authority to maintain order.
"Self-hatred is biologically and spiritually unnatural."
@MartinSellner_ joins @Colsy99 on Pelican+ to discuss the fight against the “culture industry” and its attempt to erase patriotism.
🔗https://t.co/VjlNwEclge
Exakt. Es gibt einen Frühbucherbonus bei Remigration.
Das Land, das zum ersten Mal mit echten Maßnahmen startet, wird massiven Erfolg haben, weil die Migranten in andere europäische Länder abwandern, die zu spät starten.
“European Patriots protect Europe.”
Some sort of psy-op seems to be underway. I have seen a few of these pro-EU accounts as of late.
It is quite simple; unless they are openly for remigration, they are part of the problem and have no legitimacy when it comes to speaking about a strong and patriotic Europe.
The European patriots who are concerned with the safety of Europeans are the ones who work for political change. Without regime change we will disappear. Look at Rhodesia or South Africa to see what happens.
We must be crystal clear about the following:
We are being replaced and disenfranchised in our own countries.
Not a day goes by without some sort of horrific anti-White crime being committed.
I understand the appeal of wanting to play a tough guy and talk about Putin here and Trump there – whilst conveniently ignoring the elephant in the room (i.e. the fact that we are already being attacked by strangers in our own lands).
Speaking of Putin, I am sure he is quite happy with the open borders policies of European nations. Large-scale immigration from the Third World destabilises countries.
There are two positions, you are either for remigration or you are not. Remigration will lead to a strong Europe, continuing the collective suicide (i.e. by not initiating remigration) will, needless to say, make us weaker.
Babies don't want to be aborted.
Babies don't want to be aborted.
Babies don't want to be aborted.
Babies don't want to be aborted.
Babies don't want to be aborted.
Babies don't want to be aborted.
Babies don't want to be aborted.
Babies don't want to be aborted.
Die Eliten, die seit Jahren Patriotismus ausmerzen und Patrioten verfolgen, entdecken urplötzlich die „Landesverteidigung“ als neue Steckenpferd. Jahrzehntelang wollten sie von Deutschland nichts wissen. Jetzt brauchen sie frisches Blut.
3/6
German media is clamoring "rising violence among kids" using young white boys as Stockfoto.
👉 In North Rhine-Westphalia, the number of violent foreign seventh-graders has risen by 2325 per cent since 2013.
🇵🇹 PORTUGAL: Verlust der Staatsbürgerschaft
Mit 157 Ja-Stimmen hat das portugiesische Parlament gerade ein Gesetz verabschiedet, das Richtern erlaubt, Straftätern, die zu mehr als vier Jahren Haft verurteilt wurden, die Staatsbürgerschaft zu entziehen.
Der von der Mitte-Rechts-Partei, den Liberalen und der konservativen Partei CHEGA unterstützte Gesetzentwurf zielt auf Personen mit doppelter Staatsbürgerschaft ab, die innerhalb von zehn Jahren nach Erhalt der portugiesischen Staatsbürgerschaft schwere Straftaten begehen.
Überall in Europa verbreiten sich unterschiedlich progressivere Migrationskonzepte. In Deutschland wird diese notwendige Debatte juristisch zensiert.
Remigration - europes will to live
Millions are dreaming of Remigration, in every European city this moment.
Only censorship & brutal repression keeps us powerless, distracted and disorganized.
We will unite those dreamers, organize them and turn the dream in to willpower and real action.
It is the ultimate test, if the European people have still enough lifeforce and willpower.
Every country, every city, every person is a test & a battleground.
This is the adventure, the task, the mission of our generation. Everything else is noise. Lock in.