The King's Stone.

Commissar of the Central Valley Cell of the ACP.

Cash App:

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@TowerHeretic @AncapAir There are no police, no prisons, no taxes and no bureaucracy. The economy and defense is based on interpersonal agreements and you have full authority over your private property no even zoning laws to stop you.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@underdejahvu Once again running cover for them.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@underdejahvu You're the one saying the Epstein class shouldn't be called out.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@underdejahvu And you keep running cover for the Epstein class.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@underdejahvu Why do you want to deflect from the Epstein class so bad?

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@underdejahvu Because the Epstein class is who is in charge. Your saying we shouldn't fight them?

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@justhipgnosis @BinaryDS2004 So you agree they cannot serve themselves unlike farm workers and factory workers?

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@justhipgnosis @BinaryDS2004 They don't produce surplus value and are paid from personal wealth customers use their own money. They do not produce a commodity the farmers do they perform a service on the commodity on behalf of the customer. They are rental servants.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@justhipgnosis @BinaryDS2004 The proletariat are able to labor for themselves and exist on their own as you can use the crops and goods factories and farms make. If baristas where they only people who existed who would they be serving coffee to? See a servant is dependent on a master but a proletariat is not

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@justhipgnosis @BinaryDS2004 If baristas are not servants then servants do not existits absurd to say the service industry has no servants. They do not produce surplus value they consume surplus value as the service industry is side effect of surplus wealth and doesn't grow the economy it can only circulate.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@Rikter14 @justhipgnosis @BinaryDS2004 Would you accept there is a difference between a peasant and petty-bourgeoisie farmer? Because they are distinguished on the same grounds a proletariat is distinguished from a lumpen.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@Rikter14 @justhipgnosis @BinaryDS2004 Not all workers are proletariat hence we have the categories of petty-bourgeoisie, peasant and lumpen. The peasant like the lumpen is distinguished from the proletariat by its performance of reproductive labor as opposed to productive labor.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@Rikter14 @justhipgnosis @BinaryDS2004 Well no because if baristas all disappeared we would make coffee at home if farm works and truckers and sailors all disappeared we would have no coffee. Their existence doesn't increase wealth but is dependent on a portion of the population to have surplus wealth.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@Rikter14 @justhipgnosis @BinaryDS2004 And servants are those who earn money by doing reproductive labor (such as cooking, cleaning and other house work) for others in exchange for money. Cooking does not increase the amount of food in circulation nor does cleaning a house increase the amount of available shelter.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@Rikter14 @justhipgnosis @BinaryDS2004 Meal prep is reproductive labor not productive labor as they are not increasing the amount of resources in circulation or there accessibility. Lumpen includes criminals, beggars, prostitutes and servants, and anyone who acquires wealth through labor but doesn't produce wealth.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@justhipgnosis @BinaryDS2004 Servants are lumpen. They do reproductive labor for others and don't produce wealth they only circulate it.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@Chud_Slovak1848 They do along the Yuba river in California. You should really go outside more it's full of people doing stuff.

[The King's Stone. @KraljevPeter]

@MintMangleMan And if that revolutionary nationalism resolves the contradictions of that nation's economy what's the critique?