RDR

Digital Marketing Consultant - SEO, Content, Brand

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@Bobby_1111888 Why not SOL?

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@nickeltoriches Problem though is this - Eth is getting fud due to resignations/poor tech. L2s are losing steam. Brett is gaining attention over toshi

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@Plaposaur @Diamondweb_3 Nobody should consider having a financial dashboard or report showing gross revenue from all the partnerships, collabs, etc. That level of transparency will help build confidence. Pudgy Penguins, I believe, provides more insight/disclosure on revenue.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@alphashot_ @SenorPandaHere Do you think @nobodysausage could pull the same thing? Chart looks similar.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@laurenlee @DrTurleyTalks - not good.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@teneo_protocol Is this basically near intents but with layerzero tech?

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@ProfessorPape @DrTurleyTalks - good one to analyze.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@kunalgoel Agreed. But without the fee switched turned on, cross-chain value is not being accrued to ZRO token.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@DamiDefi I dont think this includes revenue from Near Intents. @near_intents .

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@0xAmol @vibhu Yes, Solana leads in a number of areas. But its becoming increasingly easier to launch L1s as well. Canton, Monad, Tempo etc. Infrastructure that is chain agnostic will likely be more appealing long-term. Layerzero, Chainlink, Near (near-intents), etc. Why commit to one chain.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@vibhu @0xAmol Would it be an L1 though or a cross-chain omni solution that connects all chains like LayerZero?

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@Andra_ibe @LayerZero_Core Someone should do the math on how much fee revenue zero captures IF the fee switch is turned on in June.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@resdegen Great insight. What makes near special, furthermore, is that their Native products (intents) help Near's token. @Aptos unfortunately has a separate token for their native trading solution - Decibel.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@0xSunRun Challenge or concern, however, is subnet vs root. If chutes, ridges, score, or covenant/templar do well, why not just invest in those subnet tokens instead of Tao root. Remember Cosmos? Everyone bought luna, osmosis etc instead of Atom.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@AlgodTrading There's one critical nuance here - L1s with native products/apps that generate meaningful revenue, and use that revenue to buyback the L1 token. Those L1s will do well. Especially if the native products don't have their own token. NEAR intents is a good example of this.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@DBCrypt0 Interesting. Near protocol demonstrated 1M TPS last year, I believe. Im also curious to see if Layerzero's new L1 can pull this off. They're claiming 2M Tps on paper.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@unusual_whales Hmm. Going to be hard for ironclaw from @NEARProtocol to gain traction now.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@rookie_of_Ph Question - has the fee switch turned on? Meaning cross-chain fees going towards buying zero token?

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@stacy_muur I believe near intents is generating $80-110k in daily fees as well.

[RDR @Krawlarr]

@DBCrypt0 @stacy_muur Would love your thoughts on LayerZero's proposed L1 blockchain (Zero).