@Plaposaur@Diamondweb_3 Nobody should consider having a financial dashboard or report showing gross revenue from all the partnerships, collabs, etc. That level of transparency will help build confidence. Pudgy Penguins, I believe, provides more insight/disclosure on revenue.
@0xAmol@vibhu Yes, Solana leads in a number of areas. But its becoming increasingly easier to launch L1s as well. Canton, Monad, Tempo etc. Infrastructure that is chain agnostic will likely be more appealing long-term. Layerzero, Chainlink, Near (near-intents), etc. Why commit to one chain.
@resdegen Great insight. What makes near special, furthermore, is that their Native products (intents) help Near's token. @Aptos unfortunately has a separate token for their native trading solution - Decibel.
@0xSunRun Challenge or concern, however, is subnet vs root. If chutes, ridges, score, or covenant/templar do well, why not just invest in those subnet tokens instead of Tao root. Remember Cosmos? Everyone bought luna, osmosis etc instead of Atom.
@AlgodTrading There's one critical nuance here - L1s with native products/apps that generate meaningful revenue, and use that revenue to buyback the L1 token. Those L1s will do well. Especially if the native products don't have their own token. NEAR intents is a good example of this.
@DBCrypt0 Interesting. Near protocol demonstrated 1M TPS last year, I believe. Im also curious to see if Layerzero's new L1 can pull this off. They're claiming 2M Tps on paper.