@truecrimegarage How long did her husband spend in prison? If her planner was recovered 10 months after her death and he was incarcerated, doesn’t that eliminate him unless he had an accomplice?
@EvidenceProf@truecrimegarage And Adnan’s statements at sentencing have nothing to with it. It was too late. This is about the fact that he tried to initiate a plea deal. There’s no way around that.
@EvidenceProf@truecrimegarage The state didn’t come to him with an offer that he rejected because he was innocent. If he was not willing, given an acceptable offer, to plead guilty, why would he ask his attorney multiple times to seek one from the state?
@EvidenceProf@truecrimegarage Of course it would depend on the deal. Adnan asking about a plea deal on multiple occasions indicates, to any reasonable person, that he was open to the idea of possibly pleading guilty. This is not misinformation.
@EvidenceProf@truecrimegarage Yet Rabia clearly states in her book that “Adnan asked Gutierrez again to ask the State if they were offering a plea, and again she returned with a negative.”
@EvidenceProf@truecrimegarage You said both claims are false. Even if the state didn’t get the chance to reject a plea, Adnan wanted to know on multiple occasions if he could get a plea deal.
@EvidenceProf@truecrimegarage In the book it says Adnan asked about a plea deal more than once. So Christina never asked? And Urick is telling the truth?
Either way, your leading post is misleading. It’s the thing people see when they scroll, not the comments.
@EvidenceProf@truecrimegarage Your leading tweet says that Adnan wanting a plea deal and being denied by the state is “spreading misinformation.” It’s factual according to the book. That’s all.