Olivia
Online
Melina Krizalowicz 🇦🇷🧉📖⚖️🥼⚗️
@Krizalowicz
Estudiante FyB UBA + Técnicatura Superior en Bioquímica Escuelas ORT.
Basavilbaso, Entre Ríos 🇦🇷
Joined March 2011
67 Following
107 Followers
4.9K Posts
@Boringgit1 @PippaMusgrave1 @bu37027 Vuelve a leer a quien solicitó permiso Inglaterra para incursionar en Irlanda no mucho tiempo antes de Tordesillas. 😎🇦🇷
@Boringgit1 @PippaMusgrave1 @bu37027 Nunca ejerció actos soberanos ni protestas contra los si ejercidos durante 1767 y 1833.
Te recomiendo leer los considerandos en la Jurisprudencia del caso "Templo de Preah Vihear' de 1962 sobre el silencio britanico por más de medio siglo.
@MertenDK whereas Malvinas concerns an unlawful foreign occupation of Argentine soil. Historical illiteracy is hardly a substitute for an international law title. Read UNDRIP, whose Article 46 explicitly protects territorial integrity and no right to secession. 🤡🇬🇧
la propia Declaración de la ONU sobre Derechos de Pueblos Indígenas reconoce autodeterminación indígena, pero👉🏼artículo 46 aclara que nada en la Declaración puede interpretarse como autorización para menoscabar la integridad territorial o unidad política de Estados soberanos.😏
@Krizalowicz Argentinian aggression is an interesting recurring feature to focus on when talking to someone who states "nobody claims Patagonia".
@MertenDK Confounding Patagonia with the Malvinas question is a transparent exercise in geopolitical deflection. Indigenous rights in sovereign States are governed by UNDRIP—whose Article 46 explicitly protects territorial integrity. You have expones noghong with legal grounds.
@MertenDK You're on Tuiter and not affiliated in any international law UN body like me. I can laugh at your poor rhetorical skills and terrible grammar while still doing my job. That distinction matters. 😎🇦🇷
@MertenDK Me: "There is no international process recognized by the UN to "return Patagonia," nor do all Indigenous movements hold that position. Much less do they pose an obstacle to the Malvinas Cause. Take your moral dilemmas to a clergyman, not the UN."
✍🏼Melina Krizalowicz. 🇦🇷😎
@MertenDK There is no international process recognized by the UN to "return Patagonia," and...nor do all Indigenous movements hold that position.
Much less do they pose an obstacle to the Malvinas Cause.
Take your moral dilemmas to a clergyman, not the UN.
This is a legal Cause.😎🇦🇷
@MertenDK No lie.
@MertenDK There is no proceeding before ICJ, international arbitration tribunal, General Assembly or any UN body where an indigenous subject has obtained international recognition as sovereign of Argentine Patagonia😎.
UN Practice.
Legal discourse is for those who address the actual law.
@MertenDK None of the ONI's practices suggest that a third party can retrospectively convert all of Patagonia into the territory of a new indigenous state or use that hypothesis to resolve the Malvinas Cause.🇦🇷😎
🇬🇧🤡
@MertenDK Facts must still be characterised under the applicable rules. The point is not to confine reality to courts or UN documents, but to distinguish fact, law and political assertion.
@MertenDK An indigenous claim does not demonstrate British sovereignty over the Falkland Islands; if anything, it opens up a completely different legal controversy.😎🇦🇷
UN Práctice.
👉🏼Legal discourse is for those who address the actual law.
@MertenDK There is no proceeding before ICJ, international arbitration tribunal, General Assembly or any UN body where an indigenous subject has obtained international recognition as sovereign of Argentine Patagonia😎.
UN Practice.
Legal discourse is for those who address the actual law.
@MertenDK The argument has now travelled from Malvinas to the Patagonis. One wonders when the territorial title will return to the subject under discussion. Historical grievances deserve serious study; they do not become evidence for sovereignty by geographical association.
🇦🇷😎
@Boringgit1 @PippaMusgrave1 @bu37027 Wrong. Argentina's claim rests on the exercise of uncontested sovereignty. Governors, enforcement of legislation, hunting and fishing permits. Great Britain never did any of that until well after 1840 when it replaced Lafone's gauchos.
@Boringgit1 @PippaMusgrave1 @bu37027 You should be more careful about that, since papal documents authorized a certain English request to invade Ireland. It's international law from that time. 🤭
@MertenDK Invoking "violence and war" may condemn a method of conduct; it does not establish the proposition that Argentina’s territorial claim is legally extinguished. Those are separate questions under international law.
Again: 👉🏼Legal discourse is for those who address the actual law😏
@MertenDK Sir, 1982 hostilities neither conferred nor extinguished title. Malvinas Question rests solely upon succession to Spanish sovereignty and uti possidetis juris.
Repeated historical digression remains juridically irrelevant. Legal discourse is for those who address the actual law.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
ziya
Seen from United States
👌🤷♂️
Seen from Austria
Naturist Traveller
Seen from Puerto Rico
Türk Sex
Seen from Turkey
StrawberryTabby Leaked Nude Sex tape
Seen from Canada
MICHELLE DOM❌🇦🇷in🇲🇽 
Seen from United States
Sara loaiza
Seen from Poland
❤️🔥〖𝙁𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙣𝙖𝙩_𝙎𝙝𝙖𝙧𝙖𝙢𝙚𝙩〗🔥❤️
Seen from Egypt
VIVI JANDA
Seen from Germany
Güzel Veren
Seen from Turkey
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
241.6M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.1M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.9M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.8M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.3M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.1M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.8M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.1M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.9M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers