Reports reaching me from Olkalou are that residents are being asked to surrender their identity cards in exchange for a free gas cylinder and a GoK branded mattress.
This is a scheme to deny you the opportunity and right to vote on the by-elections of 16th July 2026.
Please don’t surrrender your Identity Card to anyone.
Let the Government and UDA campaigners give you the gas cylinder and a GoK mattress.
Let the cowardly regime deliver even speed boats, transformers, bullet trains, water tanks, milk and potato coolers and all that has not been delivered to Olkalou since 1963.
It is time!
But, my great people of Olkalou, do not give away your voting right. You have so far done very well in resisting goodies and cash to sway you. Don’t be deceived the last minute.
Stay firm, descendants of MauMau!
@kipmurkomen You guys proposed that he will be forgot in a month time after impeachment, it's now over an year and still going strong giving you people headaches. Come-on leave him alone he's our spoke person and Kingpin for that matter. He hasn't done yet with you ppo.
Did you know you don't always have to go to the cells for a minor traffic offense
Under Section 116 of the Traffic Act, an officer has the legal power to issue you a Notice to Attend Court (NTAC) instead of arresting you or towing your car on the spot. This official document acts as a formal court summons, allowing you to drive away and continue your day safely.
The condition is simple: you must present yourself to the designated traffic court at the exact date and time written on the slip. By law, this notice must be served to you within 14 days of the alleged offense.
Just don't ignore it! Because it carries the weight of a court summons, skipping your date automatically triggers a warrant of arrest.
#RoadSafety #UtumishiKwaWote
For FULL INFORMATION:
1. My kid bro was on the road @ntsa_kenya said he was though he didn’t know the speed he was driving at.
2. When my bro sent me the text from @ntsa_kenya , I told him to verify before he paid.
3. He called the number on it & was told to pay the fine in any @KCBInKenya nearest to him.
4. When my bro returned to Nairobi, he went to KCB Branch at Freedom Heights on Lang’ata Road.
5. My bro went to a bank teller who confirmed the fine is legitimate & that he can pay the fine.
6. My bro paid the fine & was issued with a KCB receipt!
The entire process looked so legitimate except that after paying, my bro got the text alert that the money was paid to an account of CATHERINE JERONO TOMNO.
Unless @ntsa_kenya & @KCBInKenya publicly respond to this, then we will assume that they are part of a scheme to defraud Kenyans. Why should public funds be deposited in a private account?
The antisemitic dictator Erdoğan – who is committing genocide against the Kurds, supports the Hamas terrorist organization, oppresses his own people and imprisons political rivals – is the last person who can lecture the State of Israel on morality.
The State of Israel and the IDF, the most moral army in the world, will continue to take forceful action against Iran and its proxies, which threaten the Middle East and the entire world.
Yesterday's High Court judgment on the impeachment of H.E. Rigathi Gachagua raises serious and legitimate questions that our constitutional jurisprudence must grapple with honestly. The three-judge bench found that the Senate violated the former Deputy President's right to a fair hearing under Article 50 of the Constitution specifically by declining to grant an adjournment when he was unable to attend the proceedings. The court acknowledged that violation, issued a declaratory order and awarded Ksh.50 million in constitutional damages. Yet the bench ultimately upheld the impeachment itself. I respect the court and the constitutional role it plays. But I believe this outcome calls for serious reflection on the coherence of our remedial framework.
The tension in the judgment lies in this, if the Senate's refusal to adjourn was a constitutional infirmity serious enough to warrant a finding of violation and a Ksh.50 million award, then the question that naturally follows is whether that infirmity was capable of tainting the entire removal process. The right to a fair hearing is not procedural decoration. It is a substantive constitutional guarantee, particularly in proceedings that result in the removal of a person from high public office. Courts must therefore grapple carefully with what it means to vindicate a right while simultaneously affirming the outcome that flowed from its violation. It is a difficult balance and I appreciate that the bench was navigating complicated constitutional terrain.
It is instructive to recall the reasoning of the Supreme Court in the landmark 2017 presidential election petition delivered by the then Chief Justice David Maraga. The court, in a 4-2 majority, nullified the presidential election not on the basis that the outcome was necessarily wrong but on the basis that the process through which it was arrived at did not conform to the Constitution and the law. The court found that irregularities and illegalities in the transmission of results had compromised the integrity of the election and that the constitutional standard required more than a plausible result, it required a process that was itself constitutionally compliant. That principle that a flawed process cannot produce a constitutionally valid outcome remains a pillar of our public law.
When we place that 2017 reasoning alongside yesterday's judgment, a legitimate concern emerges. Both cases involved constitutional violations in the course of a high-stakes removal or electoral process. In 2017, the violation of constitutional standards was sufficient to nullify the result entirely. Yesterday, a violation of the right to a fair hearing was found, remedied in damages but the result was preserved. These are not necessarily irreconcilable positions, courts do have discretion in fashioning remedies but the distinction must be clearly reasoned and transparently justified because the precedent being set will govern how future impeachments are conducted and how future courts respond to violations within those processes.
My concern is about the precedent this decision may establish. If a constitutional violation during impeachment proceedings can be remedied by damages without disturbing the outcome, future Parliaments and Senates may not feel the full weight of their constitutional obligations when handling removal proceedings. The court itself noted the urgent need for Parliament to enact a dedicated statutory framework under Article 150 governing the removal of a Deputy President which is a legislative gap that should never have existed this long. That recommendation must not be ignored. A constitutional democracy is built on the integrity of its processes not merely its outcomes. We must ensure that the right to a fair hearing in Kenya remains substantive and not merely symbolic.
Stroke affects the brain and often causes sudden weakness on one side of the body along with speech or vision prob lems, while Bell’s palsy is a temporary facial nerve condition that mainly causes one-sided facial drooping without affecting the arms or legs #UlizaDaktari
@citizentvkenya#UlizaDaktari Like 6 yrs ago, I surffered a mild stroke on my left side, I got a twisted mouth but has since returned to almost normal, my left eye still tears up-to-date. I acquired eye glasses to help the defect. How do I control tearing. Tnx
These politicians are going to define the next phase of politics;
✅ Babu Owino
✅ Ndidi Nyoro
✅ Edwin Sifuna
✅ Simba Arati
✅ Sylvanus Osoro
✅ Robert Mbui