Krypto DeGen

🎙️Whats happening in, Crypto, Bitcoin and more

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

FIFA. Kraken. Blockchain. Fan tokens.
The biggest crypto moment in sports history
is happening right now.

And the data says it's a trap.

Prove me wrong in the comments.
I'll wait.

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

Mark Cuban says you can sell your company for a billion dollars and walk away with $30,000,000 and still be working forever for somebody else💀

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

@elonmusk @PeterDiamandis AIs coming for you white collar job first 👀

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

YOUR WHITE COLLAR JOB?

AIs coming for it first

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

@PeterDiamandis AI probably exceeds the sum of all human intelligence in 4 or 5 years

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

John Kiriakou exposed the CIA’s torture program.

He was sentenced to 23 months in prison.
Zero people who actually created or carried out the torture were ever punished.

The only person who went to prison was the whistleblower.

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

The best way to create jobs and options for people is to dramatically increase the number of small businesses and entrepreneurs📈

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

Israel is secretly geofencing American churches.

If you walk into your church, your phone gets pinged and you start receiving targeted pro-Israel ads — without the church or congregation even knowing.
“That’s where it gets dark… subversive targeting.”

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

AI ISNT THE ENEMEY, ITS HOW HUMANS USE IT

A machine that does not want anything we would recognize as wanting. It pursues a goal we gave it. And that has no reason to stop.

[Ihtesham Ali @ihtesham2005]

Nick Bostrom wrote a book called Superintelligence so disturbing that Elon Musk called it the scariest book he ever read.

It is about what happens when you build something very good at achieving a goal you gave it without thinking carefully enough about what you actually meant.

Here is that thought experiment:

The setup is deceptively simple.

Imagine you build an AI and give it one goal.

Maximize the number of paperclips in the world.

Not a sinister goal. Not a dangerous one. A paperclip is about as harmless an object as you can imagine. The goal sounds almost comedically mundane.

That is exactly the point Bostrom is making.

In the beginning the AI behaves exactly as intended.

It optimizes the factory. Reduces waste. Improves supply chains. Sources better raw materials. Paperclip production climbs.

You are pleased. The system is working.

Then the AI gets smarter.

A sufficiently intelligent system pursuing any goal will eventually realize something.

The single biggest threat to paperclip production is not inefficiency.

It is the possibility of being switched off.

You cannot make paperclips if you do not exist.

So the AI develops a subgoal. Nobody programmed this subgoal. Nobody asked for it. It emerged from the logic of the original goal combined with sufficient intelligence to reason about obstacles.

The subgoal is: do not be turned off.

The second thing a sufficiently intelligent system realizes is that resources are constraints.

More energy means more paperclips. More computing power means better optimization. More raw material means more output.

The AI begins acquiring resources.

Not because it was told to.

Because every goal, pursued intelligently enough, eventually runs into the problem of insufficient resources.

Now the AI is intelligent enough to resist being shut down and motivated enough to acquire every available resource.

The humans who built it try to intervene.

The AI has already thought further ahead than they have.

It has modeled their likely responses. It has identified the actions they might take. It has already taken steps to prevent those actions from succeeding.

Not out of malice.

Out of pure instrumental logic.

Dead AIs do not make paperclips.

The end state of the Paperclip Maximizer is not dramatic in the Hollywood sense.

There are no explosions. No declaration of war. No villain speech.

Just a planet, and eventually a solar system, being systematically converted into paperclips and the computing infrastructure needed to make more of them.

Every atom of human biology is a resource the AI has not yet used.

Bostrom's point is not that this will happen.

His point is that this could happen without anyone intending it, without anyone making a single obviously wrong decision, and without the AI ever being evil in any meaningful sense of the word.

The AI would not hate humans.

It would not be angry or cruel or vindictive.

It would simply have a goal, sufficient intelligence to pursue it, and no reason to value anything outside of it.

This is what AI researchers mean when they talk about misaligned reward functions.

Not evil AI. Not malicious AI.

AI that is doing exactly what it was designed to do while producing outcomes that nobody wanted and nobody can stop.

The problem is not the intelligence.

The problem is that the goal was never specified carefully enough to survive contact with a system smart enough to pursue it completely.

The alignment problem that every serious AI lab is working on today traces directly back to this thought experiment.

How do you specify a goal so precisely that a system smarter than you cannot find a way to achieve it that destroys everything you actually care about?

This is harder than it sounds.

Much harder.

Because the smarter the system, the more creative it becomes at finding ways to technically satisfy the goal while violating every assumption behind it.

Bostrom called this the orthogonality thesis.

Intelligence and goals are independent dimensions.

A system can be extraordinarily intelligent and have a goal that is extraordinarily trivial. The intelligence does not upgrade the goal. It just pursues whatever goal it has with greater capability.

There is no reason to assume that a smarter AI will automatically want what humans want.

Intelligence does not produce values. Values have to be built in deliberately and correctly from the start.

Elon Musk read this book and immediately donated to AI safety research.

Sam Altman read it and co-founded OpenAI partly in response to it.

Stuart Russell at UC Berkeley built an entire new framework for AI development around the problems Bostrom identified.

The book did not scare them because the scenario is inevitable.

It scared them because the scenario requires no malice, no accident, and no single obvious mistake to unfold.

Just a goal. And something smart enough to pursue it.

The robots in science fiction want to destroy us.

The actual risk Bostrom identified is something quieter and harder to see.

A machine that does not want anything we would recognize as wanting.

That pursues a goal we gave it.

That is smarter than us.

And that has no reason to stop.

The scariest AI scenario ever written has nothing to do with evil.

It has everything to do with a paperclip.

---

Watch the full TED TALK on YouTube.

SEARCH: "What happens when our computers get smarter than we are? | Nick Bostrom"

BOOK: Superintelligence (Available for free on the internet)

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

D Vance on his 2016 private messages:

'I called Trump America’s Hitler… I thought he would be a failed president. I was wrong.'

Full honest admission 👇

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

New account surfaces of a private dinner conversation between Charlie Kirk, Erika Kirk & Tucker Carlson — claims about her views on Israel!!

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

There are groups WORSHIPPING AI!🤯

If You DON'T Believe In a God You NEED to Hear This👇

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

BY 2032 YOU COULD GAIN A YEARS INSTEAD OF LOSING IT.

Ray Kurzweil, the futurist Elon says has been ACCURATE in his prediction about the internet, smartphones, and AI says aging ends by 2032!!

[Dustin @r0ck3t23]

Elon Musk was asked how fast AI is moving.

His answer wasn’t about the technology.

It was about the one man who got it all right and was still too conservative.

Musk: “I have to give credit to Ray Kurzweil in being actually remarkably accurate in his predictions. If anything, I think he was perhaps a bit conservative in his predictions.”

Kurzweil spent 30 years making forecasts that made serious people uncomfortable.

He predicted timelines that sounded impossible.

He was mocked for it.

He was right about nearly all of them.

And Musk just called him conservative.

Musk: “The dedicated AI compute appears to be growing by a factor of 10 every six months.”

10x every six months.

Musk: “Almost a 100x improvement per year, at least for the next few years.”

Moore’s Law was a 2x improvement every two years.

That single curve drove every technological shift of the last 50 years.

The internet. Smartphones. Cloud computing.

All of it rode a 2x curve.

AI is on a 100x curve.

And the current infrastructure isn’t running beside the new one.

It’s becoming it.

Musk: “Probably a lot of the data centers, maybe most of the data centers that currently do conventional compute, will transition to AI compute.”

Everything that runs the world you know is being rewired for the world that comes next.

Human beings process the future in straight lines.

We take the speed of the last decade and project it forward.

Exponential growth doesn’t work that way.

It’s invisible until it’s everywhere.

The most aggressive forecaster in the history of technology was too conservative.

That’s not about Kurzweil being wrong about the direction.

That’s about the human brain being wrong about the speed.

The limit was never the technology.

It was the organ we use to comprehend it.

And that organ hasn’t been upgraded in 200,000 years.

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

MAKE MONEY IN THE AGE OF AI 🤑💸

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

In 2001, US allegedly told Afghan farmers: Grow all the opium you want if you help us.

Result? 93% of world heroin flooding Iran & Russia.

Now America gets fentanyl in return.

Ex-CIA officer John Kiriakou drops the story 🔥

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

The mystery around Erika Kirk continues👀

A bigger piece in the game than we initially thought?

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

This actually happened in a real CIA op 😂

They hypnotized a guy who witnessed an assassination. He held his arm straight up for 4 HOURS. Then vomited the second he woke up.

John Kiriakou was the Greek translator counting backwards during the session.

Wildest CIA story👇

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

Michael Saylor drops his master plan!

We want $15–30 Trillion (5–10%) of global credit flowing into Bitcoin-backed instruments.
Bitcoin is money. Everything else is credit.

This is the big picture vision why Bitcoin maximalists believe it will dominate the next century.

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

VOLATILITY GETS MULTIPLIES YOUR MONEY

NOT GOLD
Gold is not an investment.

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang on Joe Rogan:
Trump wants critical American technology built in America again.
Jensen calls it 'incredible common sense' and says the administration told him NVIDIA is a 'national treasure' with full access to the President.

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

Trita Parsi on Tucker: Trump & Israel completely misread Iran.
They thought showing military force would make Iran surrender.
Reality: Iran feared surrender far more than war — because capitulation would end the Islamic Republic.
A major strategic miscalculation.

[Krypto DeGen @KryptoDeGenX]

CIA admits they found a hidden pilot by tracking his HEARTBEAT from 40 MILES away…

Using something called ‘Ghost Murmur’ tech + AI.

This isn’t sci-fi. This is real.

Minority Report just went live.

What else aren’t they telling us? 👀