![BecauseYrBored's tweet photo. A paradigm-shifting event may be taking shape for Akash.
#1408 is the missing ingredient for BME
Link: https://t.co/J1ajh0shRs
Credit first: the @akashnet team built BME because they wanted the token to matter. Their own spec admits the old payment rails "reduced demand for AKT"-- so they engineered the fix.
But a conversion machine [BME] only converts what flows into it, and that inflow is a number the chain can't fully show us today.
By design, customers pay in plain dollars and never touch $AKT. @gregosuri has said it himself: enterprises see crypto as friction. Removing it from the UI is how you sign them — and $7K/day of growing on-chain business, visible in the chain data itself, says it's working.
The trade-off: the dollars-to-token conversion happens out of public view. Unverifiable from outside. Until now.
#1408 would change that.
Overclock Labs (OCL) would remit a share of managed-provider revenue to the community pool..., monthly, in $AKT, scaling with the buildout.
Most critically: Thie author confirmed the strictest version. OCL's own usage pays the highest rate -- 90% to the pool.
They didn't have to scope it that way. They did.
Here's what changes [if passed as it stands]:
The remittance is a disclosure. When 70–90% of revenue lands on-chain monthly, anyone can work backwards to the whole income picture; and check it against OCL's quarterly reports.
Overclock keeps a fixed, published fee; they're a business doing real work: sales, settlement, counterparty risk. That's not extraction. Don't mistkae that. It replaces the old open-ended expense deductions with a number anyone can audit.
An $AKT bill has only two funding sources:
[1] Oppen-market buying: external demand, measurable for the first time, or
[2] Existing inventory: equally visible.
Either way, the meter starts running.
Putting it together:
The market already showed what it does when Akash ties activity to the token -->BME's launch repriced AKT once.
#1408 is that logic with a multiplier: @gregosuri is publicly pushing for more GPUs, citing demand he can't serve. Every GPU that lands grows the monthly obligation.
Here's the key: @akashnet is courting enterprises of crypto-averse demand; Customers who will never touch a token, by design.
#1408 connects that ocean to $AKT anyway. The customer pays plain dollars; the bill settles in the token. Two stories, finally the same one.
Now the scale.
Today, $5–6K/day flows through BME. The stated buildout demands: 512 GPUs now, 2,000 in three months -- per @gregosuri is multiples of today's numbers flowing acorss the network. Multiples.
[I'm not holding him to that time-frame, but only citing his tweets]
Against the other side of the ledger: at today's prices, absorbing the chain's entire issuance takes roughly $18–19K/day of real buying....
A A 2,000-GPU fleet remitting under #1408 crosses that line on conservative assumptions. Past it, every additional GPU is buy-pressure the schedule can't absorb --> and governance just cut inflation in half this spring.
Same dollars, twice the coverage. Supply and demand converging from both directions at once.
BME was the engine. #1408 is the fuel line. The buildout is the throttle ---> and for the first time, all three bolt to the same machine.
A seminal moment is upon us.
DYOR. #DEPIN](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKnHZzIWwAAKYKY.jpg)
![BecauseYrBored's tweet photo. A paradigm-shifting event may be taking shape for Akash.
#1408 is the missing ingredient for BME
Link: https://t.co/J1ajh0shRs
Credit first: the @akashnet team built BME because they wanted the token to matter. Their own spec admits the old payment rails "reduced demand for AKT"-- so they engineered the fix.
But a conversion machine [BME] only converts what flows into it, and that inflow is a number the chain can't fully show us today.
By design, customers pay in plain dollars and never touch $AKT. @gregosuri has said it himself: enterprises see crypto as friction. Removing it from the UI is how you sign them — and $7K/day of growing on-chain business, visible in the chain data itself, says it's working.
The trade-off: the dollars-to-token conversion happens out of public view. Unverifiable from outside. Until now.
#1408 would change that.
Overclock Labs (OCL) would remit a share of managed-provider revenue to the community pool..., monthly, in $AKT, scaling with the buildout.
Most critically: Thie author confirmed the strictest version. OCL's own usage pays the highest rate -- 90% to the pool.
They didn't have to scope it that way. They did.
Here's what changes [if passed as it stands]:
The remittance is a disclosure. When 70–90% of revenue lands on-chain monthly, anyone can work backwards to the whole income picture; and check it against OCL's quarterly reports.
Overclock keeps a fixed, published fee; they're a business doing real work: sales, settlement, counterparty risk. That's not extraction. Don't mistkae that. It replaces the old open-ended expense deductions with a number anyone can audit.
An $AKT bill has only two funding sources:
[1] Oppen-market buying: external demand, measurable for the first time, or
[2] Existing inventory: equally visible.
Either way, the meter starts running.
Putting it together:
The market already showed what it does when Akash ties activity to the token -->BME's launch repriced AKT once.
#1408 is that logic with a multiplier: @gregosuri is publicly pushing for more GPUs, citing demand he can't serve. Every GPU that lands grows the monthly obligation.
Here's the key: @akashnet is courting enterprises of crypto-averse demand; Customers who will never touch a token, by design.
#1408 connects that ocean to $AKT anyway. The customer pays plain dollars; the bill settles in the token. Two stories, finally the same one.
Now the scale.
Today, $5–6K/day flows through BME. The stated buildout demands: 512 GPUs now, 2,000 in three months -- per @gregosuri is multiples of today's numbers flowing acorss the network. Multiples.
[I'm not holding him to that time-frame, but only citing his tweets]
Against the other side of the ledger: at today's prices, absorbing the chain's entire issuance takes roughly $18–19K/day of real buying....
A A 2,000-GPU fleet remitting under #1408 crosses that line on conservative assumptions. Past it, every additional GPU is buy-pressure the schedule can't absorb --> and governance just cut inflation in half this spring.
Same dollars, twice the coverage. Supply and demand converging from both directions at once.
BME was the engine. #1408 is the fuel line. The buildout is the throttle ---> and for the first time, all three bolt to the same machine.
A seminal moment is upon us.
DYOR. #DEPIN](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKnEOBvWcAAyK1L.jpg)
Olivia
Online
Kryptoswe 🐽☁️
@kryptoswe
Nothing you read here is financial advice
Joined October 2017
623 Following
2.2K Followers
12.4K Posts
Too many people still think @akashnet is just another #AI narrative token.
This breakdown highlights what really matters:
✅ Real revenue
✅ Real GPU demand
✅ Production workloads
✅ Transparent team
✅ Proven product-market fit
At a ~$238M market cap, the risk/reward looks hard to ignore.
The AI race won't be won by models alone. It will be won by whoever owns the compute marketplace.
Akash is building exactly that. #DePIN #Ai #GPU $AKT #web3 #DeAI
@Xolazi Sket fullständigt i farsan på sista. Vilka strutar 🚀
@FerryTayleX @octa_space You can choose to do it without personal information. Important to offer both solutions
@patriklu Smalt. Men bra post
Who to follow
Timmy 銃 
@TendermintTimmy
Jack of all trades.
"Master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one."
Building @Unum0x
Day 1 ⬡Marine
Zoltan⚛️
@ZoltanAtom
Cosmos Spaces🎙️
@Cosmos_Spaces
Please DM to schedule an X Spaces AMA 🎙
For Validator Links, Discord, Telegram, Email - click on our website. ☮️💜⚛️
A paradigm-shifting event may be taking shape for Akash.
#1408 is the missing ingredient for BME
Link: https://t.co/J1ajh0shRs
Credit first: the @akashnet team built BME because they wanted the token to matter. Their own spec admits the old payment rails "reduced demand for AKT"-- so they engineered the fix.
But a conversion machine [BME] only converts what flows into it, and that inflow is a number the chain can't fully show us today.
By design, customers pay in plain dollars and never touch $AKT. @gregosuri has said it himself: enterprises see crypto as friction. Removing it from the UI is how you sign them — and $7K/day of growing on-chain business, visible in the chain data itself, says it's working.
The trade-off: the dollars-to-token conversion happens out of public view. Unverifiable from outside. Until now.
#1408 would change that.
Overclock Labs (OCL) would remit a share of managed-provider revenue to the community pool..., monthly, in $AKT, scaling with the buildout.
Most critically: Thie author confirmed the strictest version. OCL's own usage pays the highest rate -- 90% to the pool.
They didn't have to scope it that way. They did.
Here's what changes [if passed as it stands]:
The remittance is a disclosure. When 70–90% of revenue lands on-chain monthly, anyone can work backwards to the whole income picture; and check it against OCL's quarterly reports.
Overclock keeps a fixed, published fee; they're a business doing real work: sales, settlement, counterparty risk. That's not extraction. Don't mistkae that. It replaces the old open-ended expense deductions with a number anyone can audit.
An $AKT bill has only two funding sources:
[1] Oppen-market buying: external demand, measurable for the first time, or
[2] Existing inventory: equally visible.
Either way, the meter starts running.
Putting it together:
The market already showed what it does when Akash ties activity to the token -->BME's launch repriced AKT once.
#1408 is that logic with a multiplier: @gregosuri is publicly pushing for more GPUs, citing demand he can't serve. Every GPU that lands grows the monthly obligation.
Here's the key: @akashnet is courting enterprises of crypto-averse demand; Customers who will never touch a token, by design.
#1408 connects that ocean to $AKT anyway. The customer pays plain dollars; the bill settles in the token. Two stories, finally the same one.
Now the scale.
Today, $5–6K/day flows through BME. The stated buildout demands: 512 GPUs now, 2,000 in three months -- per @gregosuri is multiples of today's numbers flowing acorss the network. Multiples.
[I'm not holding him to that time-frame, but only citing his tweets]
Against the other side of the ledger: at today's prices, absorbing the chain's entire issuance takes roughly $18–19K/day of real buying....
A A 2,000-GPU fleet remitting under #1408 crosses that line on conservative assumptions. Past it, every additional GPU is buy-pressure the schedule can't absorb --> and governance just cut inflation in half this spring.
Same dollars, twice the coverage. Supply and demand converging from both directions at once.
BME was the engine. #1408 is the fuel line. The buildout is the throttle ---> and for the first time, all three bolt to the same machine.
A seminal moment is upon us.
DYOR. #DEPIN
![BecauseYrBored's tweet photo. A paradigm-shifting event may be taking shape for Akash.
#1408 is the missing ingredient for BME
Link: https://t.co/J1ajh0shRs
Credit first: the @akashnet team built BME because they wanted the token to matter. Their own spec admits the old payment rails "reduced demand for AKT"-- so they engineered the fix.
But a conversion machine [BME] only converts what flows into it, and that inflow is a number the chain can't fully show us today.
By design, customers pay in plain dollars and never touch $AKT. @gregosuri has said it himself: enterprises see crypto as friction. Removing it from the UI is how you sign them — and $7K/day of growing on-chain business, visible in the chain data itself, says it's working.
The trade-off: the dollars-to-token conversion happens out of public view. Unverifiable from outside. Until now.
#1408 would change that.
Overclock Labs (OCL) would remit a share of managed-provider revenue to the community pool..., monthly, in $AKT, scaling with the buildout.
Most critically: Thie author confirmed the strictest version. OCL's own usage pays the highest rate -- 90% to the pool.
They didn't have to scope it that way. They did.
Here's what changes [if passed as it stands]:
The remittance is a disclosure. When 70–90% of revenue lands on-chain monthly, anyone can work backwards to the whole income picture; and check it against OCL's quarterly reports.
Overclock keeps a fixed, published fee; they're a business doing real work: sales, settlement, counterparty risk. That's not extraction. Don't mistkae that. It replaces the old open-ended expense deductions with a number anyone can audit.
An $AKT bill has only two funding sources:
[1] Oppen-market buying: external demand, measurable for the first time, or
[2] Existing inventory: equally visible.
Either way, the meter starts running.
Putting it together:
The market already showed what it does when Akash ties activity to the token -->BME's launch repriced AKT once.
#1408 is that logic with a multiplier: @gregosuri is publicly pushing for more GPUs, citing demand he can't serve. Every GPU that lands grows the monthly obligation.
Here's the key: @akashnet is courting enterprises of crypto-averse demand; Customers who will never touch a token, by design.
#1408 connects that ocean to $AKT anyway. The customer pays plain dollars; the bill settles in the token. Two stories, finally the same one.
Now the scale.
Today, $5–6K/day flows through BME. The stated buildout demands: 512 GPUs now, 2,000 in three months -- per @gregosuri is multiples of today's numbers flowing acorss the network. Multiples.
[I'm not holding him to that time-frame, but only citing his tweets]
Against the other side of the ledger: at today's prices, absorbing the chain's entire issuance takes roughly $18–19K/day of real buying....
A A 2,000-GPU fleet remitting under #1408 crosses that line on conservative assumptions. Past it, every additional GPU is buy-pressure the schedule can't absorb --> and governance just cut inflation in half this spring.
Same dollars, twice the coverage. Supply and demand converging from both directions at once.
BME was the engine. #1408 is the fuel line. The buildout is the throttle ---> and for the first time, all three bolt to the same machine.
A seminal moment is upon us.
DYOR. #DEPIN](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HKnI6XeWkAANqak.jpg)
Exactly 6 months away from us being featured at our 1st Comic Con Event. We got some super cool sh** that we are lining up in the months leading up to it. Stay tuned 🙏🏽��
@SneakyProds 🐽
There is only 1 project that has been increasing its on-chain active wallet count for the past several years in the Cosmos ecosystem.
Its time to pay attention to real utility.
https://t.co/oWLZvgcWDn
The new Sentinel is here with a website that does justice to the ecosystem
https://t.co/0dmqpctifL
Independent dVPN built on Sentinel has received interest for a low 6 figure acquisition. That is a business built with 0 marketing expense right in front of your eyes. From 0 users to 700k+ users including APK installations.
https://t.co/CRFGoVmzKy
Sentinel has the only DePin infrastructure where entrepreneurs can aim to build their own multi-million dollar business with 0 offchain server dependencies. All they require is a chain RPC.
Sentinel provides you with the compute for your application logic, access to bandwidth, and the most resilient P2P networking protocol with its on-chain DHT structure.
@gunnarssonhanna @Sofia52617054 Bättre männen får bestämma över dom. Speciellt män för 2000 år sedan.
SentNodes, an operational dashboard for Sentinel node operators built by the team at @busurnode, has received a significant update.
Operators can now benefit from improved node analytics, real-time revenue tracking, wallet metrics, enhanced health monitoring, daily reporting, and a refreshed user experience.
Another example of independent teams continuing to strengthen the infrastructure available across the Sentinel ecosystem.
https://t.co/IGZfyvTIyE
a new ATH for @akashnetAI yesterday -- and most likely today too -- closing on 8 billion tokens a day
@NordnetAra Sover ut och sätter på 06.00 utan att veta resultat. Man har inget att bevisa genom att se live.
@cryptomanran Americans getting an excuse to pump in more ads. Never happen in Europe
Our first roadmap from 2023 is now basically completed, together with a lot of other things we didn’t even have on the list back then.
So it feels like the right time for a new one.
Plans can always change, but this is our current direction:
☀️ Summer 2026 – New Sneaky Shop
Launch of our upgraded online store with a proper shopping cart, improved checkout and new Sneaky merchandise, including the new Sneaky logo T-shirt and logo cap.
🎮 Q3 2026 – Sneaky Game
Play on desktop and mobile. Weekly prizes, leaderboards and rewards. Everyone can play, NFT ownership not required.
🃏 Q3 2026 – New Sneaky Trading Cards
Physical cards return with holo cards, chase cards and game stats.
🏪 Q3 2026 – Retail Expansion
Sneaky products enter physical stores in Sweden.
🇺🇸 Q4 2026 – Comic Con Event in the US
Sneaky will attend a Comic Con event in the US, bringing the brand closer to new collectors, gamers and fans.
🌍 2027 – Expand the Sneaky Brand
More events, more countries, more products and continued growth of the Sneaky universe.
Thank you for being part of the journey 🐽❤️
The epic battles of the Sneaky Islands are coming to mobile and desktop 😏
Climb the leaderboard.
Earn rewards.
Win glory.
🐽🏆
@DavidssonoMann 'Angående Arsenal
@DavidssonoMann Som att med medias vänster-vinkel kan man inte ha en annan åsikt än vänster. Samma fenomen på X.
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Sanya Gautam
throatslut
Seen from United States
Pep 69
Seen from Jordan
💥18+ Girls masturbation & Lesbians Only 💥
꧁⪻♥𝚠𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚕𝚞𝚜𝚝♥⪼꧂
Seen from India
mzansi 2k's🍑
Seen from South Africa
Battambang Horny
Türk Olgun Porno - Türk Milf Porno
Seen from Turkey
Srinivasan Sethuraman
Seen from Netherlands
หนุ่ม50+ชอบสาวแก่รุ่นยายสูงวัย60+70+
Seen from Thailand
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
240.3M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
109.7M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.5M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.7M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
87.2M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
81M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.6M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.6M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
69.2M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.6M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61.9M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
60.3M followers