lamapama

Exploring crypto & stocks | Running a Telegram channel | Mainnet/testnet validator | Chasing retrodrops

[lamapama @Kugata]

I chose to burn XP for an NFT in Ethos Season II.

Make your decision at https://t.co/rlHrAf4dys

[lamapama @Kugata]

Just unlocked my Gas ID via ETHGas 🪪

I'm a Teen Jack with 0.6327 ETH spent on gas since Beacon Chain - now fueling my climb to the Gasless Future and earned 240 Beans already.

Reveal yours at https://t.co/hCYT7R5pmO

[Nazoku @Nazo_ku]

Wallet [0x7fB] is identified as a $Linea wallet. Post-TGE, this address has sold off ~$62,000,000 in Linea (Sixty million USD). Looking back at the timeline:

- Sept 15, 2025: Metamask launched mUSD with an initial circulating supply of $24M.
- Sept 19 – Oct 7, 2025: Supply surged to $60M and peaked at $101M following further issuance. Today: The supply has since trended downward, retracing to its original $24M level.

Why is mUSD labeled a stablecoin, yet its supply is so volatile? Furthermore, why was it issued immediately following the Linea TGE? Is Metamask facing a liquidity crunch?

Ultimately, here’s hoping for a stronger comeback for $Linea in 2026!

Linea Wallet: 0x7fBE2d1893a8C22Ab024F5e7cB49A44C797DFC9D

Data: Arkham, Lineascan

[CHAINFLIP @Chainflip]

From zero to $5,000,000,000 swapped:

1bn → 363 days
2bn → 113 days
3bn → 107 days
4bn → 66 days
5bn → 46 days

Thank you to every single person who believed and swapped with us.

[lamapama @Kugata]

@CashmereLabs gm

[lamapama @Kugata]

@harishmelwanii @Truthseekerszs @aztecnetwork YES!

[lamapama @Kugata]

@harishmelwanii @xsociaI @aztecnetwork Trust me, the team will have tokens on day one — it’s just that those tokens will be labeled as “for marketing,” “for operational needs,” “for network functioning,” and lots of other purposes, all nicely disguised so they can dump them on the very first day.

[Linea.eth @LineaBuild]

Linea's burn mechanism is now live!

Every transaction on Linea will burn both ETH and LINEA, directly reducing supply and reinforcing long-term value for both tokens.

Deflationary by design.

https://t.co/HDSROgBM2f

[Linea.eth @LineaBuild]

The Linea ecosystem is about to become a perpetual buyer of its own token.

- Gas burns
- Native yield
- Institutional capital
- And no sell pressure from VCs or insiders

The flywheel is about to kick in. Let's break down what's coming, and how it all compounds…

[CZ 🔶 BNB @cz_binance]

Full disclosure. I just bought some Aster today, using my own money, on @Binance.

I am not a trader. I buy and hold.

[lamapama @Kugata]

I’m sorry, @Consensys, but I’ll never touch any of your activity from now on. @LineaBuild milked and did too much damage to the community. We all saw your wallets and that you sold from them; it’s all on the scan. So, no, I won’t throw my money on @MetaMask.

[lamapama @Kugata]

This typo on button looks really bad @MetaMask

[lamapama @Kugata]

@Noahhcalls Apple Tesla Nvidia

[NAGI @0xnag1]

⌘ Apriori: What Happened Behind the Scenes
[click to read better]

When I heard about what happened with @aPriori, I decided to collect some data and today, I finally finished the analysis.

You can find the links to the .csv and .xlsx files in the comment section.
In this analysis, I reviewed the top 200 holders of $APR and their on-chain activity.

Here’s what we can understand from the data:

- Almost all of these wallets were created 18–19 days ago (between 2025-10-05 and 2025-10-06).

- Nearly all of them have no on-chain activity other than $APR tokens.

- Some wallets made trades on @naddotfun, where the memecoins they traded show very similar chart patterns.

❗️To me, this suggests that the Apriori team opened https://t.co/wMfOz04as0 and made a few token purchases just to make the transaction lists of certain wallets look more active.

- Almost all of the top 200 $APR holders have no NFT activity.

❗️None of them hold 1M NADS, Cipher Games P.O.G., or any testnet NFTs. This is a major red flag, considering Monad has a vibrant NFT ecosystem.

- Only Three wallets were seem like a real user.
I highlighted these wallets with green color in the .xlsx file. Here are these wallets

1. 0x0A114a08938D0EFA353edD70DAbEe4b61539Ab62
- Active since 107 days ago, 187 Trxs, has NFT trades

2. 0xfb0522AC77CF4080AA021BeAB120092dd5d1cEf2
- Active since 247 days ago, 347 Trxs, has NFT trades

3. 0xFd1e5BDc31EcF8069d797Bde25284b9301b520c7
- Active since 207 days ago, 7824 Trxs, has NFT trades

Putting all of this together, it becomes clear that all those top wallets, which were also eligible for the airdrop, belonged to the team.

Forget about the airdrop itself; this level of betrayal and dishonesty toward their own community, and even more so toward the Monad community, is truly disgusting.
This chain has been in development for almost three years, and right as it’s preparing for its mainnet launch, a native ecosystem project chose to do this, to both its own supporters and the broader Monad.

I don’t know what kind of perks Apriori has received, but first and foremost, if they are part of the Monad Momentum program, their submission should be terminated immediately.

[lamapama @Kugata]

Just unlocked my Gas ID via ETHGas 🪪

I'm a Teen Jack with 0.6327 ETH spent on gas since Beacon Chain - now fueling my climb to the Gasless Future and earned 240 Beans already.

Reveal yours at https://t.co/hCYT7R5Xcm

[lamapama @Kugata]

$PHI Airdrop successfully claimed! 🎉 https://t.co/y3gFDMYDb2

[lamapama @Kugata]

Linea ну ебтвоюмать stop selling! We see what you doing it's all in onchain! @LineaBuild @ethereumJoseph

[CZ 🔶 BNB @cz_binance]

Bntober
Astober
Bitober
😁

[Linea.eth @LineaBuild]

Going fast!