@BBCNews Blaise Pascal was right:"A king without diversion is a man full of miseries." Lottery winner, announcing the death of someone he assumed would be forgotten for good, he now extending an invitation to the singer of "Candle in the Wind 1997." An extraordinary emotional undertaking
@Zaaaxii@BBCNews Children can lie. But at the age Louis was at the time, they never lie through a drawing. The child saw a woman’s face, red with flowing blood. Was it his nanny, his aunt, his mother, his grandmother, or someone else?
@BBCNews This is not his own artwork. It is a copy. You are manipulating public opinion,forcing people to refute your claims, only for them to then be accused of bulling a 13-year-old kid. Given this, I can see why Trump is suing you for 10 billion. Serves you right for your manipulations
@donmcgowan Her family receives half a billion a year, which allows her to devote herself to her art. How much have you received from the taxpayers to do what you do? And are your children billionaires? Don't listen to the royalists and the brainwashed trolls.
@DailyMail Yes, he has a talent for copying a school exercise, just like many children his age, except they don’t have a magazine and fanatical writers to put them on a pedestal. Copying is not creating. Enough with the lies and the manipulation of public opinion.
@ZandiSussex Life of lie.
1. William, savior of the Middle East. Result: nothing.
2. Photos and videos of Kate with her family, even though she is supposedly away due to cancer. Result: a scar on her temple. And a house where she can stay hidden from prying eyes.
3. Copying is't creating.
@Marly21036678 Why didn't the Waleses simply state that George had copied a piece of work as a learning exercise ? This brings to mind that infamous Mother’s Day photo where Kate was supposedly absent due to an "imaginary" cancer, only to reappear later with a noticeable scar on her temple.
@JeremyVineOn5 Jeremy Vine. Putting on a somber, compassionate face while inviting people onto your show to badmouth others is hypocritical. Of course, this cannot be compared to rape or physical assault, but public harassment also causes a great deal of harm to its victims. Thinking of Meghan
@MrMaximilan@SkyNews The British and global press linked to Rupert Murdoch has cultivated a whole ecosystem of racist anti-Meghan sentiment; those who consume this content reading it, watching it provide the revenue and the audience figures. Stories involving white people offer them no such benefit.
@eleanorzjames@EdwardJDavey The royal family has been of German origin since 1714. Are they English? I know they are white. Is being white a universal ethnicity? If so, then there is no such thing as an English ethnicity.
@JackieD86388657@EdwardJDavey Why do you accept being subjects of a royal family that has nothing English about it, but is entirely German? Or do you perhaps consider all white people to be of the same ethnicity : English ?
@EdwardJDavey A little research reveals that there is nothing English about the current royal family, other than the fact that they are white. George of Hanover became King of Great Britain in 1714. The famous Queen Victoria married her German cousin, Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.
@EdwardJDavey I am not English. Reading some of the reactions, I wonder why they accept the current royal family. The father of the present king was Greek and Danish, and became a naturalized Englishman through marriage. And what if he hadn’t been white-skinned?
For years, #GMB allowed Piers Morgan to abuse Meghan because she refused his friendship. Only one man stood up against the vile and diabolical behavior of that monster Morgan. Alex Beresford. So, as for the rest of you: shut your mouths, you cowards and accomplices. #GMB
@ZandiSussex In this case, the deception on the part of the parents is not that Georges copied an image as part of his learning process, but rather that they failed to explicitly state this. He knows how to copy, but he is not yet a creator of original work. The same applies to Kate’s photos
@neilseanshowbiz@HelloCanada Do all those who speak in the British Parliament do so in the main chamber? No. In Westminster, there are over a 1000 rooms, many of which are used for meetings. I know this, and I’m not even British. So are you really that ignorant?
@KaiseratCB This reminds me of Omid Scobie, who, by failing to explicitly state that it was indeed Charles and Kate who made racist remarks about Archie, sabotaged his own book. Perhaps his publisher got cold feet, but their vacillating did real harm to the book *Endgame*.
@ZandiSussex It’s both pathetic and funny. Two private individuals invited by an institution of the European Union, which these idiotic Brexiteers left, and he’s complaining about it! Hatred knows no bounds!
Soon he’ll be telling us that Charlie doesn’t even want to see a photograph of them.