Kyle E. Leary

Primarily (not only) extension to to help to tell the truth of Area 51's international war w/ secret weapons & spy satellite hacks

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

Here is a new statement from me:

For approximately 25 years, I have been subjected to illicit orbital monitoring and torture by spy satellites with the capacity to see through roofs to read ordinarily-sized text on paper. This was attained through cyberattack of the Government of Canada's network during the period unbeknownst to anyone in Canada. Up to October 2016 in sporadic episodes, and since then constantly, I was tortured by secret technology, deployed through the satellites, able to turn electromagnetic fields into weaponry. The details of this are disturbing and pertain to rudimentary mind-control and sexual violence.

The attacks, which are etymologically termed biopsychotronic, include Havana Syndrome, or what the US Government refers to as anomalous health incidents (AHIs), as well as New Brunswick Mystery Illness. A smaller number of other biopsychotronic attacks have been conducted against others. Generally, these attacks make use of electronic devices with sufficiently strong electromagnetic fields (including, up to now, smartphones and spy satellites) to violate the victim's physical integrity. Approximately 2,000 people altogether have been attacked this way 1996-present, based on public reports pertaining to Havana Syndrome. Additionally, approximately 5,000,000 people (my estimate) have been victim of illicit orbital monitoring across the three continents of North America, Europe, and Africa for being in close proximity to me during the period beginning approximately 2002 and continuing today.

Almost certainly, the perpetrators are personnel of the United States Government hidden behind the protection of state secrecy in the United States who perpetrate today a global existential threat which not any US Administration has demonstrably acted to halt.

Assuredly, the biopsychotronic technology is the fourth weapon of mass destruction (along with traditional biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons). This weaponry is in the hands of people demonstrably willing and able to commit acts of senseless violence and indignity to millions of people altogether.

The policy environs of the attacks are perhaps as troubling as the attacks themselves. Given the attacks are carried out by personnel of the United States Government, this government is engaged in a coverup. While it is contrary to Executive Order to classify a crime with intent to conceal it, this illegitimate secrecy is derived from sources and methods doctrine, which requires the classification of intelligence methods.

Generally, sources and methods doctrine is the worst human rights violation of America today after the attacks themselves. It implies that elections are not genuine, freedom of expression is denied and the US Congress is disenfranchised. From my vantage, external to American domestic politics, the scope of this injustice in America is, after the attacks themselves, subordinate only to its status as the worst international aggressor under covert action policy's provision for covert regime change, partisan electoral intervention, disinformation campaigns, etc..

However, the scope of sources and methods doctrine is quite international as it appears to exist in every state which is a party to a US-centric secret international intelligence alliance. This international human rights violation implies elections are not genuine, freedom of expression is denied, and legislatures are disenfranchised in all of the states party to this alliance. From the disclosures of Edward Snowden, these appear as: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom (with the USA, the Five Eyes States), Algeria, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Republic of Korea, Macedonia, Netherlands, Norway, Pakistan, Poland, Romania, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates. Generally, classification of intelligence methods implies elections are not genuine, freedom of expression is denied, and legislatures are disenfranchised.

The first biopsychotronic attacks continue to constitute a global existential threat at the time of this writing, and their policy environs represent the worst international human rights violation after only the threat posed by the attacks themselves.

Let the strength of our common nature carry us forward.

Kyle E. Leary
Caledon, Ontario, Canada
2026-04-01

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

https://t.co/8CvjgML5MJ

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

When I was doing work for the University of Guelph in South Africa 2009-2010, under the satellite unbeknownest to me, I would gym (as my ingroup lingoculture described it) four times a week, getting not quite the ten hours of weekly physical exercise mentioned here, but not very far off from doing so. Now I can't gym at all due to pain and suffering from being zapped and blasted under the satellite such that I can barely walk for exercise. It's sad, I miss the gym!
https://t.co/d7FDZjdCW4

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

I was a pizzamaker for a few years during high school, making and selling pizzas at an Italian restaurant (20 years ago). There, I once noticed a colleague sniff loudly as if to indicate something. Did the mind control by satellite cause me to notice this as I did? It may never be known. In any event, I act like this today, under the satellite still!

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

Alors que je vais tel que je peux aller, je suis heureux.
https://t.co/qoxTlV0FCQ

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

The principle of "editorial independence", which I first read about perhaps five years ago from an infosite of @VOANews (which has editorial independence both by self-identification and by my own judgement), is necessary but not sufficient for some media outlet to actually be a member of the oft-cited free press.
The capacity of state media, let us observe, is *not* sufficient criterion to rule out an outlet as having editorial independence, as @CBC, @BBC, @SABCNews, @ABCaustralia, etc. demonstrate.
While editorial independence is necessary but not sufficient for membership in the free press, laws of the outlet's jurisdiction matter too: In some places where laws deny the freedom of the press, the same laws generally criminalize editorial independence. While these places do not include so-called western countries, in these states, sources and methods law is sufficient to deny freedom of the press, although it is not editorial independence, but factual reporting of states' behavioural possibilities, which is targetted.
We need complete freedom of the press, with editorial independence being fully normal and states' behavioural possibilities being fully publishable.

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

Chinese state media reportedly (via @guardian) reports that President Xi used "inadvisable"... neat English from any source!
https://t.co/8XRJVEPDDL

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

Among the effects of the use of the space-based biopsychotronics, it's not only mind-control. Inter alia, the electromagnetic field from the satellite attracts lightening to my location, blimey!

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

Just busy being finished killing a somewhat large housefly. It occurred to me, as it has from time to time over these years: what of spy drones designed to look like somewhat large house flies? We need democratic laws, and sources and methods law is not an example of them!

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

While many may know that the #hdca represents a philosophy of freedom, read: [Sen, Amartya (2009). "The Idea of Justice". Allen Lane. Chapter 17: Human Rights and Global Imperatives, from first subsection "What are Human Rights?" through second subsection "Ethics and Law" to end of first paragraph, third subsection "Beyond The Legislative Route"] to learn about the weight which freedom can carry in its philosophical capacity.

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

The mind-control is terrible and inter alia causes me to doubt what words should be italicized; unfortunately, this is serious.

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

READ: Sen, Amartya (2009). "The Idea of Justice". Allen Lane. Chapter 17: Human Rights and Global Imperatives, from first subsection "What are Human Rights?" through second subsection "Ethics and Law" to end of first paragraph, third subsection "Beyond The Legislative Route".
(*Inter alia*, argues that Jeremy Bentham had a facile view of human rights rights when he wrote: "Right, the substantive right, is the child of law; from real laws come real rights; but from imaginary laws, from 'law of nature', can come only imaginary rights." [Wherein, Sen finds, Bentham rejects natural rights].)

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

Negative Legal Rights and Positive Legal Rights

Not the only theorizing of today, but Natural Law says legal rights create legal obligations. Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen presents a more nuanced argument which basically goes like this: Human rights (objects of international law) are grounds for individuals to appeal to any party on their own or others' behalf for some change.
Therewith, just seeing now, in a third source, the idea that "violations" create obligations. Altogether, this makes sense: legal rights define legal violations, and legal violations create legal obligations. Perhaps, the legal obligation, that is, only exists if the legal right is violated, which can make sense if there is an anterior state of the world wherein the right is universally respected and, for example, the state coming in serves to trample it or put the respect of it at risk.
This supports a thought I have had before: there are human rights' violations, human rights' successes, and human rights' failures. If these conditions of human rights speak to the quality of the lives which are actually being lived by people, then as they can in theory live these lives with or without legal rights (for example in an anterior state of the world where there is not violation (or risk of it) of all that which the legal rights enjoin), then human rights' failures are just occurrences where the legal rights require improvement upon the condition of life which people have or would have without them: the legal right creates the grounds for improvement, and without it being there, there is no legal violation, and hence no legal obligation.
The conclusion there, in other words, is about the idea that human rights are not just constituted as what I can now refer to as "negative legal rights", to protect against trespasses of authority governed by law (like the state, but also any person), but also as "positive legal rights", to provide for enjoying legally guaranteed conditions of the quality of life.
(Recall: it is contingent on the claim that legal rights *perse* do not create obligations, only legal violations do. I think this idea has merit. While one might say that the law is everywhere (within its jurisdiction), it is not that the law explains behaviour in a social scientific sense, only that it exerts an effect upon the violation of it (with a corresponding claim by some person). Put simply: the law has no effect unless it is violated.)

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

As it happened, democracy needed me, but I served it well, and the Americans surely have no monopoly on democracy.

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

The Americans may need me, but they surely demonstrate that they don't value me. So they can get lost.

[António Guterres @antonioguterres]

Housing is a human right, and fundamental for human dignity.

Yet nearly three billion people live in inadequate housing, often in informal settlements and slums.

We must put housing at the centre of sustainable development — leaving no one behind.

[Kyle E. Leary @KyleEdwardLeary]

Writing from a combination of knowledge and estimation (what the #CIA calls analytic judgement) telling me I am doing so before the facts have occurred, if a Canadian Prime Minister ever becomes aware of the first space-based attack, the individual is or is not @MarkJCarney. I am alive or not when that happens.
For my words, while self-published in the form of social media and blog, they exist long enough where they are and succeed or not to be acted on by political leadership around so-called western world.