The Pitbull debate is so funny to me because the only dog that ever attacked my lab was a Pitbull at a dog park. I can’t bring my sons to my mothers house because she has pitbulls that bark non stop and would likely try to rip my sons to pieces, a Pitbull mauled my oldest sons cat to the point where the only way to end her suffering was to shoot her.
It’s not all pitbulls but somehow it’s coincidentally almost always a Pitbull
@billybinion Is it your belief, then that your soul was randomly shot into your body like a random card being dealt on a poker table?
Your framing makes no sense otherwise. There’s no possibility “you” could have been born as someone else, or it wouldn’t have been you.
Of course one person could not be another person, but people get confused because they assume because they can imagine it, it must be a possibility. So I find it more effective to use inanimate objects as examples.
Could this rock have been that rock? Could this chair have been that chair? Even down to the molecular scale, could a particular atom or molecule have been a different atom or molecule? It then becomes obvious that the question makes no sense, and presupposes a belief system they likely reject explicitly.
@memeticsisyphus@Will_Tanner_1 The details of who EXACTLY gets to vote are complicated, sure, but the general concept that some people shouldn’t get to vote should not be controversial.
Incompetent people should never get to have a say over how other people live.
We look at schooling/herd behavior in animals and think how silly, but from a statistical standpoint, it must work better than the alternative. Stand out and you have a small chance of a big success and a large chance of being eaten. Alternatively, blend in and have a much larger chance of being overlooked, albeit with zero chance of big success.
@BretWeinstein People reason from their intuition and priors and justify their conclusions after the fact. Intuition seems tied to temperament, so in a sense, perhaps they are correct to think that way except it's a temperament thing instead of a moral thing - which isn't that far off.
@DataRepublican It’s just different brands of the same collectivist garbage. The gestalt is essentially the same. The sophists will argue particulars in hopes of confusing vulnerable minds, but it’s not different in any real or meaningful sense.
If you donated money to anyone claiming to be Shiloh Hendrix on Twitter, file a chargeback immediately. It is easy. You will get your money back and the perp will be hit with $25-$35 fees for each chargeback.
He'll find himself banned from opening new financial accounts.
Something is at war with us, “us” being regular citizens who want things to work and to be left alone. We’re slow to react because we think in terms of nations. Our enemies are mafias that wear our governments like a cloak to defeat our eyes, and fly our flags to disarm our minds
Let's take a walk through the "American justice system," shall we?
Sharmake Omar is the Somali man who filmed Shiloh Hendrix on the playground in Minnesota that day in April 2025.
In January 2022, he and another Somali man "allegedly" spent two days raping an underage foster care runaway in a trailer, keeping her falsely imprisoned.
In March 2025, all charges were dismissed "in the interest of justice."
Weeks later, in April 2025, he turned his camera phone on at the playground after a young Somali thief attempted to steal from a White mom, Shiloh Hendrix, and began haranguing that White mom for having said the word "nigger." Omar demanded that Hendrix repeat the word on camera, which she did - four times, while Omar himself said the word five times in the less-than-one-minute video.
Four long months later, multiple "disorderly conduct" charges were maliciously brought against Shiloh Hendrix for the playground incident in which she was the only victim, and Sharmake Omar was the videographer.
Then, last night, Shiloh Hendrix was CONVICTED - specifically for saying "nigger" to Sharmake Omar AFTER he demanded she say it, while he himself said it repeatedly. Her sentence is a $1,000 fine and 200 hours of community service.
By the way, Sharmake Omar WAS NEVER CALLED TO TESTIFY in the Hendrix trial.
But don't worry, that's not all the justice we have in store for today. Just keep the substance of Shiloh's "crime" - as well as her sentence - in mind as we move forward.
Rewind to April 2020. That's when Sharmake Omar, our favorite Somali videographer, along with another Somali friend of his (separate from his alleged co-raper), committed a violent assault in the street. Omar threw a rock at a car, then attacked and beat the 16-year-old driver. A bystander tried to intervene, but Omar's accomplice threatened him with a knife.
For this, Sharmake Omar was charged merely with DISORDERLY CONDUCT. Yes, for hurling a deadly weapon at a vehicle, then beating the teenage driver while his criminal pal held off onlookers at knifepoint, Omar faced the EXACT SAME CHARGE that Shiloh Hendrix faced for saying a word that Omar asked her to say, as she held her child in her arms and fled the playground before Omar could assault her, too.
Like Shiloh Hendrix, Sharmake Omar was convicted on his count of disorderly conduct.
His sentence?
A $200 fine.
That's it. That's the entire thing.
So, to review:
Rape an underage foster child for two days (allegedly)? Clean slate.
Hurl a deadly weapon at a car and assault its driver? $200.
Say a word to an accused rapist/kidnapper and convicted violent criminal who demands you say it while saying it himself? $1,000 and 200 hours - not to mention international infamy.
Could the anti-White standard be any more egregiously in our faces?
Seriously, everyone involved in prosecuting the Shiloh Hendrix case is unspeakably evil. This includes, but is not limited to:
~ Rochester City Attorney Michael Spindler-Krage
~ Lead prosecutor Nicholas Shabel
~ Judge Christa Daily, who ensured Shiloh's conviction
~ The Rochester NAACP
~ Rochester's "Community Engagement Response Team"
~ Rochester Mayor Kim Norton
~ Rochester City Council President Randy Schubring
~ Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison
~ Minnesota's Council on American-Islamic Relations
~ Sharmake Omar, without whom none of this would have happened
~ The young Somali thief's non-English speaking parents
~ Innumerable members of the local Somali scam network
~ Six jurors - two men and four women (reportedly all White) - who unanimously agreed that White people are not protected under the US Constitution
While we're here, a special dishonorable mention must go to every single "FIRST AMENDMENT" organization in this hollowed-out country of ours. You know the ones - they relentlessly solicit and collect large sums of money to "DEFEND FREE SPEECH" while continuously, cravenly shrinking away from EVERY meaningful case where White people - LITERALLY THE ONLY GROUP WITH MAJORITY SUPPORT FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT - are so clearly maliciously persecuted.
Similarly, NOT ONE official at any level of government has spoken up to defend Shiloh Hendrix or her Constitutional rights, nor to condemn the flagrantly anti-White, utterly unconstitutional witch hunt she's endured. Not one.
And on that note, we conclude today's review of the good ol' "American justice system."
Lady Justice isn't blind. She's anti-White. And it's never been plainer to see.