for literally ANYONE who may not know: the amount of stalkers and death threats she’s received has forced her security team to set up facial recognition software at concerts to track her stalkers. Her security team also carries wound dressings and QuikClot with them in case she’s attacked. This particular stalker just arrested was seen over 30 TIMES in the last 2 months near her apartment but was only now finally put in jail. But people will still complain that her private jet is simple preposterous and can’t fathom WHY she can’t fly commercially. (she bought more than DOUBLE the carbon credits needed to help offset the costs of her travel just an fyi).
And now you have sick fucks making ai p0rn of her because what? Because She went to a football game? Because she’s acting like a normal human again and letting herself be seen in public again? Now we have people saying “it’s good that these images were made of her b/c now she will do something about it”. Why should she HAVE to be an activist for this kind of shit. She was previously a victim of SA and she took the man to court only after her tried to sue HER for the loss of his job. She countered for $1. Literally $1 just to make a statement (yes, she won.) Maybe just maybeee men (and some women) could stop being fucking freaks and start treating females with respect. Why don’t you go and make ai images of yourself or your s.o. or family if you love doing it so much? It’s just fake anyway, right?
And to say you dislike Taylor’s music is perfectly fine, not everyone is a fan, but that is NO excuse to treat her like she’s subhuman. Just admit you have a fragile masculinity and can’t handle seeing an extremely successful woman be happy.
Taylor has been in the spotlight for 18 years now, and she has NEVER had a single person come out saying anything but nice things after an encounter with her (fuck Kimye, they were proven to be liars when the whole phone call was leaked but 1/2 of y’all already spent years DRAGGING her for it). She silently donates HUNDREDS of thousands of dollars to local food banks to the cities she tours in. She is an extremely generous boss and gave her truck drivers EACH a $100k bonus this past year for helping on the US leg of the tour (she in total handed out 5mil worth of bonuses to her tour crew). She’s invited HUNDREDS of fans into her homes to show them her new albums before they were released and even REMEMBERS THEM BY NAME. She’s a truly just GOOD human being. But y’all want to criticize her every second for dating in her 20s (she’s had 13 bfs over 18 years btw but y’all wanna act like she had a new one every week)
If there was ever a human who DESERVES their fame, it’s undoubtedly Taylor Swift.
She’s literally just a woman doing what she loves and supporting the people she loves. The absolute BARE MINIMUM you could do is just show a modicum of respect.
NEW: COVlD-19 mandates are coming back just in time for the 2024 election cycle as early signs are hinting towards what's to come.
What impeccable timing!
Just days after a TSA whistleblower allegedly reported that mandates would be coming back in October, Lionsgate, a Hollywood studio, announced they were bringing back mask mandates.
“Employees must wear a medical grade face covering (surgical mask, KN95 or N95) when indoors except when alone in an office with the door closed, actively eating, actively drinking at their desk or workstation, or if they are the only individual present in a large open workspace,” response manager Sommer McElroy said.
Morris Brown College recently announced new mandates: "All students and employees are required to wear face masks."
The Biden administration is also ramping up their COVlD rhetoric.
"We will be encouraging all Americans to get those boosters in addition to flu shots and Respiratory Syncytial Virus shots," a White House official announced.
Buckle up.
Last week, a comedian podcaster asked me if 9/11 was an “inside job or exactly as the government tells us?” I answered truthfully: I do not believe everything the government has told us about that day. I wasn’t referring to the baseless theories about controlled demolitions at buildings around the World Trade Center, but the very real possibility supported by recently declassified documents that al-Qaida’s attack was undertaken with support from Saudi intelligence officials.
Apparently, that breached a third rail of American politics. Democrat Senator Chris Murphy from Connecticut tweeted: 'If you want to be the GOP presidential nominee, you need to believe the government blew up the Twin Towers, and Osama bin Laden is an innocent man who’s living under an alias in Miami.' Former Vice President Pence said he was 'deeply offended' that I don’t trust that the government told us the full truth in the 9/11 Commission Report. The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board pages mocked me for wading into “fever swamps” and were appalled that a presidential candidate 'really just said that,' quipping that “back on planet Earth, the 9/11 Commission was one of the better efforts at government accountability in recent memory and its findings have never been discredited by anyone credible.”
Hold on there. Back on the real planet Earth, the FBI declassified documents in 2021 which reveal that the 9/11 Commission flatly lied about potential Saudi government involvement in the attacks. Yes, it’s in our national interest to move on from 9/11 and to preserve a stable relationship with Saudi Arabia – but our best chance of rebuilding public trust is to acknowledge the truth about one of the defining events in our nation’s history.
A key question confronted by the 9/11 Commission was whether the Saudi government was involved in planning the attacks. The report concluded there was neither Saudi government nor royal family involvement. At the time, questions swirled around a 42-year-old graduate student who welcomed, housed, set-up bank accounts, and gave rent money to the first two Qaida hijackers after they landed in Los Angeles in January 2000 – concerns which the FBI and 9/11 Commission flatly dismissed.
The Saudi student, Omar al-Bayoumi, claimed to have met the two terrorists entirely by chance; The 9/11 Commission report verified that Bayoumi’s altruism was in the name of hospitality as he claimed. And FBI official, Jacqueline Maguire, testified to the 9/11 Commission in 2004 that Bayoumi’s first meeting at a café with the hijackers appeared to be “a random encounter.”
This is all against the backdrop of a 1998 FBI investigation revealing that rather than attend graduate school as he purported, Bayoumi frequented local mosques, doling out money for various causes and frequently and conspicuously videotaped visitors. The “graduate student” reportedly put up $400,000 to start a mosque in San Diego and all the while was paid a stipend and other expenses as a ghost employee of a Saudi contracting company, the FBI reported. Notwithstanding these facts, both the FBI and the 9/11 Commission emphatically supported Bayoumi’s account.
Now over 20 years later, the FBI has changed its story. In documents declassified last year, the bureau affirmed that Bayoumi was in fact an agent of the Saudi intelligence service who worked with Saudi religious officials and reported to the kingdom’s powerful ambassador in Washington.
These revelations are now the focal point in a long-running federal lawsuit in New York, where 9/11 survivors and relatives of the 2,977 people who were killed are seeking to hold the Saudi government responsible for the attacks. Even if the media doesn’t want to litigate the case against the Saudi government, these survivors and family members are – and understandably so.
There are reasons to believe that successive U.S. administrations hid the Bayoumi revelations to provide public cover to the CIA for critical failures in the lead-up to 9/11. The two Saudis, Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, were known to the CIA as al-Qaida operatives. The CIA was watching as they joined an al-Qaida planning meeting in Malaysia in early January 2000. But the agency reportedly lost track of the two when they flew on to Bangkok and then to Los Angeles on Jan. 15, 2000. Embarrassingly, the CIA did not alert the FBI for more than a year after it learned the terrorists had entered the United States using their real names and Saudi passports.
Given the enduring mystery over how the CIA lost track of Hazmi and Mihdhar in Malaysia, former FBI investigators have speculated that Bayoumi might have been asked to approach the hijackers as part of a U.S. or Saudi intelligence operation to recruit them. At the time, former officials have said, the CIA was trying desperately to develop sources inside al-Qaida.
The CIA has consistently denied that it allowed the hijackers to come into the United States as part of a failed recruitment effort. Former White House counterterrorism coordinator, Richard Clarke, cited this as a plausible explanation for the CIA’s failure to track the first two hijackers and its abiding refusal to alert the FBI to their presence in the United States.
The government hasn’t done itself any favors since then to build public trust around 9/11 or the U.S. response to it. The Pentagon’s prevarications about celebrity soldier Pat Tillman’s death in Afghanistan – initially claiming he was shot by enemy forces, but later forced to admit that he was killed by friendly fire – is one undisputed case among many.
These events are important foremost because U.S. government officials continue to lie about other matters of public importance – the origin of Covid-19, knowledge about UAPs, Hunter Biden’s laptop, and so on – with a complicit media that just accepts the prevailing narrative without question. This fuels rampant public distrust. There is no credible evidence that 9/11 was an 'inside job,' but ironically when the government systematically lies about Saudi involvement and the media runs interference, that lends plausibility to an otherwise nonsensical claim.
There’s no such thing as a noble lie. The reason the people don’t trust the government is because the government doesn’t trust the people. And yes, a Republican candidate for President really just said that.
I hear a lot of stories of men who sit in their cars before coming in the house to their wives.
I never want this to be the case for my future husband.
The home should be a loving and safe place that your husband looks forward to coming back to after a long day.