@thsottiaux Learning, or some checklists for certain events so that it doesn't repeat the exact.same.problems.every.time - or to report if it received contradictory instructions at least
@arejula27@andrew_s_toth I'm working on an alternative where we can completely remove background validation - the trust would come from every other full node validating the UTXO set at that height, crowdsourcing the trust (and simplifying our codebase)
A new release candidate of Bitcoin Core, v32.0rc2, is available for testing.
This is a new major release, and follows v31.1.
Work-in-progress release notes are here: https://t.co/e1LU4i99Uk
Binaries are available here: https://t.co/ZCkYrHGLzx
So what's your objection to Core exactly? Anything concrete, or did you just hear from the podcasters that you're making a difference by attacking people who actually do stuff instead of endlessly complaining? If it's something useful, let us know, we appreciate thoughtful feedback. But if you're an average hater, block me (or I will). If you genuinely care about the future of Bitcoin, any testing and actionable feedback would be appreciated.
@serbtcx@theinstagibbs Mostly small bugs, unhandled wallet corner cases, overflows for user provided data, not handling crashes or data corruption, needless memory consumptions, etc