🫅🏻

[Diwyani @DiwyaniVajpayee]

I look at my friends who had clarity & agency from a very young age, then I look at the relationship they have with their parents. makes sense. when your adult trusts you to make your own decisions, make mistakes, &

[Anish Moonka @anishmoonka]

You tell a friend you'll be ten minutes late, then add three full sentences about the traffic and the broken elevator, just so they don't think you're flaky. That little habit has a name, and for a lot of people it goes straight back to childhood.

Underneath, it's your nervous system trying to stop rejection before it happens, and it runs a bit deeper than just being called a liar. Therapists call constant overexplaining part of the "fawn" response. The three best-known stress reactions are fight, flight, and freeze; a therapist named Pete Walker added a fourth one in 2003 and called it fawn. The idea is simple: when a kid can't fight back and can't run, the nervous system tries another way, keeping the bigger, scarier person happy. Overexplaining is one of the main ways that shows up in adults. Give someone every reason and every detail upfront, and they can't be angry with you, and they can't leave.

The childhood version has a name too. Back in 1993, the psychologist Marsha Linehan described the "invalidating environment," a home where a kid's side of the story keeps getting brushed off, mocked, or punished. Kids raised that way, she found, stop trusting their own memory of what happened and start watching everyone else for signs of what's okay. Being accused of lying is one version of that. So is a parent whose mood changed the rules every day, so you could never tell what would get you in trouble. What a kid lands on is the same either way: explain everything in advance, and leave no gap for anyone to fill with the worst version of you.

In 2003, UCLA researchers put people in a brain scanner and had them play a simple online ball-tossing game, secretly rigged so the player got left out. The spot that lit up when they felt excluded was the same part of the brain that handles physical pain. Getting shut out of a group runs through the same wiring as a stubbed toe. That is why a hint of someone's disapproval can feel like an emergency, and why the words come out before you've decided to say them.

None of this means every long explanation is a wound. Sometimes you're just being thorough, and there's nothing wrong with that. The pattern only matters when it runs on autopilot, when you catch yourself justifying things nobody asked about. The tweet nailed the feeling. Underneath it is a kid who learned that being believed had to be earned, still earning it decades later.

[` @schiz04renic]

“do you have any hobbies?” yeah i do informal psychoanalysis on everyone i meet.

[Bami- @Bamixoxo_]

First thing we need to understand with figures of speech is that context matters a lot.
Let me explain.

This will be quite lengthy, so skip it if you have a short attention span.

Euphemism: A polite substitution used to soften meaning. It is the use of a mild, polite, or indirect expression instead of one that may sound harsh, unpleasant, or offensive.

Examples:
She passed away instead of She died.
They let him go instead of They fired him.

The purpose of a euphemism is to avoid causing discomfort or offense through one’s choice of words.

Dysphemism: A harsh substitution used to intensify meaning or express disapproval. It uses a harsh, blunt, or offensive expression instead of a neutral or polite one. (Opposite of Euphemism)

Examples:
He croaked instead of He died.
Calling a house a “shack” or an old car a “heap of junk.”

These two figures of speech are not the focus because he used Peller as an example to illustrate the decline of education and the glorification of mediocrity. The best expressions to examine here are synecdoche and metonymy, which are often confused with each other.

Moving on.

Synecdoche is a figure of speech in which a part of something represents the whole, or the whole represents a part.

It is a special type of substitution. (Hold on don’t draw your conclusions yet.)

Examples (Part for the Whole):
All hands on deck. (Hands = sailors or crew members.)
There are many mouths to feed. (Mouths = people.)

Whole for Part:
Nigeria won three gold medals. (Nigeria = the Nigerian athletes.)
The school celebrated its success. (The school = the students and staff.)

Now for metonymy. It is a figure of speech in which you refer to something by the name of something else that is closely associated with it, rather than by its own name. Get it?

For example:
The White House announced a new policy.(The White House refers to the U.S. President or administration, not the building itself.)
The Crown will address the nation. (The Crown refers to the monarch.)

People confuse synecdoche and metonymy because they both involve substitution, but they work differently.

I’ve been seeing tweets saying it’s synecdoche and I don’t think some people understand the subtle difference. That’s where I come in.

The best way to understand them is this:

Synecdoche = inclusion (part–whole relationship).

Examples:
Hands = workers
Wheels = car
Heads = cattle or people

Metonymy = association (relationship by connection).

Examples:
Aso Rock = the Nigerian government
The Crown = the monarch
Nollywood = the Nigerian film industry

Synecdoche specifically depends on a part–whole relationship, whereas metonymy depends on any close association.

What do I mean?

Peller is known to be uneducated, so when ycee says “Peller culture,”

he is not saying Peller is literally a part of illiteracy as a whole. Instead, Peller has become associated with illiteracy because of his reputation as a known olodo.

That is metonymy.

It can only be synecdoche if Peller is presented as one member of a larger class, and the intention is for that member to stand for the entire class.

For example:

If he had said “Peller is the face of olodo culture in this country.”

Here, Peller is one individual standing for the larger group of illiterate people. Remember: part–whole representation.

So, in conclusion, “Peller culture” is best analyzed as metonymy because:

Peller’s name is being used because of its perceived association with the idea of illiteracy/glorification of mediocrity.

The name “Peller” becomes shorthand for the olodo uprising that ycee was criticizing.

He was not attacking Peller personally. Instead, he used Peller’s public image as a symbolic reference to a wider social issue. That is a metonymic use of the name.

You’re welcome.

An interesting point is that synecdoche is often treated as a subtype of metonymy because it is simply a more specific form of associative substitution.

[Luna M ✨ @tiredfeminist_]

I miss the version of me that existed before my grandmother passed. Some deaths really do change you.

[𝓐 ⭑ @ayojoestar]

I have a theory. One of the reasons millennial women are being diagnosed with adhd in perimenopause (myself included) because we don't self-medicate with nicotine like the generation before us.

[Aseel Swaid @aseelswaid9]

This Egyptian poem is from 3300 years

[✦ 𝓢𝓱𝓲𝓷𝓮 ✦🪐 @upshine3]

People with ADHD have what’s called Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria (RSD). It’s an extreme emotional response to perceived criticism or rejection.

Your brain can’t regulate the emotional pain, so a small comment feels like a devastating attack. A minor correction feels like total failure. Someone’s tone feels like hatred.
It’s not oversensitivity. It’s not being dramatic. Your brain literally can’t modulate the intensity of that emotional response.

It’s neurological, not a character flaw

[🍂 @Lovandfear]

“If you ever find yourself in the wrong story, leave.”

— Mo Willems, Goldilocks and the Three Dinosaur

[꧁༒☬ 𝔾𝕒𝕓𝕣𝕚𝕖𝕝 ☬༒꧂ @Gabbrielxzn]

If you have Complex PTSD (CPTSD), your amygdala is hypersensitive due to past trauma. This means small triggers (a certain tone of voice, a dismissive look, or a minor mistake) can send you into a panicked, overwhelming state.

[Tanya Junghans @tanyajunghans]

Sue Nyathi did her research!

Psychologist and criminologist have found that a man can start beating his woman up later in life. It is not always immediate. Even he may think he could not do it until he does.

The behaviour abusers and killers of women have is:
Coersive control.

Men who have killed or beaten their partners started with this.

[Efe @SassyE]

Just finished watching the Earth, Wind, and Fire documentary. You can eat all the healthy foods for decades but adverse childhood experiences will take you out everytime. Goodness.

[CooperBaggs 💰🍞 @edgaralandough]

Lukewarm take: we need to stop using mental health/therapy buzzwords in day to day life. Not everyone you dislike is a narcissist. Being sad doesn’t mean you’re depressed. There’s a resounding difference between being nervous and having anxiety. You’re not ADHD because you don’t like to sit still. You’re not autistic because you’re quirky. OCD doesn’t mean you’re organized. And for the love of all that is holy, not every situation that made you uncomfortable is “trauma”.

[Dampop ✨ @Dampop_]

A working woman will meet her million pounds one day.

[Adekunle Olopade @adekunleolopade]

@eke_ng_ As of today, intelligence doesn’t put food on the table anymore, shamelessness does.

Once we are able to hit a reset on this as a society, normalcy will return.

[Electra @Electrarythm]

Do not fall for this trap