Redneck Azn

sarcastic positive lover of soy products. Drinker of lattes. Enjoy LARP and butterflies. Totally into arts and stuff. Sculpting is my jamzz. Origami master.

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

Ok - to balance out all the negativity and politics

Watch this👇. Man this dog is kewl. This will make you happier.

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

The utterly corrupt USAID, a cesspool of taxpayer money funneled into Democrat organizations, campaigns, and shadowy dark money schemes, is finally getting the axe it deserves. The State Department dropped a bombshell letter to Congress on Friday, announcing that it’s swallowing up USAID’s functions by July 1, 2025, and slamming the agency’s doors shut for good—firing every last employee in the process.

In a separate memo to USAID’s soon-to-be-jobless staff, the State Department made it crystal clear: every position not etched in law is toast. This long-overdue “Reduction-In-Force” will hit on either July 1 or September 2, 2025, wiping USAID off the map. NewsNation got its hands on both documents from a source deep in the know about USAID’s operations.

Today, USAID workers were told to clear out of the office by midday, according to one employee NewsNation caught on their way out the door. The letter to Congress, penned by Paul Guaglianone from State’s Bureau of Legislative Affairs, spells out the plan to gut USAID, cherry-picking a few functions to tuck into the Department of State’s regional bureaus while torching everything else that doesn’t fit the Administration’s priorities. Global health programs like the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief will get shoved into State’s Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy.

Both the memo and letter casually mention that the State Department will hold a separate hiring spree to fill its foreign assistance slots, tossing a bone to USAID’s ex-employees to apply if they feel like it. But don’t hold your breath—Jeremy Konyndyk, Refugees International prez and ex-USAID insider, called foul, screaming that shuttering USAID without Congress’s green light is flat-out illegal. He told NewsNation that Secretary of State Marco Rubio is playing a dangerous game, thumbing his nose at Congress and begging them to slap him down.

This bombshell lands as an earthquake rocks Myanmar and Thailand, with State Department mouthpiece Tammy Bruce claiming USAID’s “team of experts” is somehow still on standby to help—raising the question: who’s actually left to send? The corrupt, Democrat-slush-fund days of USAID are numbered, and good riddance.

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

Appeals court rules DOGE can continue operating at USAID in another win for Trump admin | Fox News https://t.co/9gDPOzNxB6

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

Meet Harry Sisson, the influencer accused of soliciting nudes from a series of women: the controversial Gen Zer has millions of TikTok followers – the Democrat has also met Joe Biden and Barack Obama | South China Morning Post https://t.co/xPv0OICfmt

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

🚨Exposing the NED: A U.S. Instrument of Global Influence🚨

The National Endowment for Democracy (NED), presented as an NGO championing democracy, functions as a key tool of U.S. foreign policy. With a mandate to destabilize governments, shape public perception, and incite unrest, NED has earned widespread criticism for its covert interventions. Funded primarily by Congress—receiving $315 million in 2023—and directed by the State Department, it pursues a calculated agenda of global subversion.

NED’s activities span continents and include:
- **Iran**: Fueled 2022 hijab protests by funding activists and disinformation campaigns.
- **Ukraine**: Supported the 2004 Orange Revolution and 2013–2014 Euromaidan with millions to opposition groups and media.
- **North Korea**: Backed efforts to erode the regime through NGOs and public opinion campaigns.
- **Arab States**: Exploited social media and funded NGOs to spark “color revolutions” during the Arab Spring.
- **Mexico**: Financed groups opposing government reforms, prompting accusations of interventionism.
- **Cuba**: Supported 54 anti-government organizations since 2017, including direct payments to operatives.
- **Russia**: Funded exile opposition and media during key elections despite restrictions.
- **India**: Critiqued democratic governance via its Journal of Democracy, targeting Modi’s leadership.
- **Europe**: Influenced EU officials and media to align with U.S. interests.

Far from impartial, NED advances U.S. strategic goals, threatening national sovereignty and stability. As its methods sharpen, nations are increasingly alert, pushing back to safeguard their independence.

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

Louis DeJoy, the U.S. Postmaster General, abruptly resigned from his post earlier than anticipated, and it’s raising some serious eyebrows.

The guy was digging in his heels, flat-out refusing to let Elon Musk’s DOGE team poke around in the agency’s computer systems—pretty suspicious behavior for someone who’s supposed to be running a transparent operation. Even shadier?

Insiders are whispering that DeJoy’s terrified of what an audit might uncover, which doesn’t exactly scream confidence in his leadership. Appointed by Trump in the chaotic mess of 2020, DeJoy announced last month he’d step down once the USPS board picked a replacement, but instead, he bolted Monday, handing the reins to deputy Doug Tulino temporarily. This all comes after Trump threatened to meddle with the supposedly independent USPS board—against U.S. law, no less—because DeJoy wouldn’t play ball with DOGE’s demands. Something’s rotten here, and it’s not just the mail piling up.

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

Damn

President Trump’s cabinet is damn good looking

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

Ilhan Omar Married Brother: Ilhan Omar reacts to news claiming to 'confirm' that she married her brother - The Times of India https://t.co/1r4fxELz46

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

House looking at action to rein in federal judges amid Trump restraining orders | Fox News https://t.co/Nuom994ccN

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

Conservative Star Erupts On CNN Panel, Lights Up Liberal Woman: WATCH https://t.co/VocJpv0z2v #Outkick

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

Scott is a beast

CNN's Scott Jennings slams ex-Biden official Neera Tanden on air https://t.co/O05X1Tqzzt

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

Dropping bombs

IDF carries out strikes on Hamas terrorists in Gaza Strip - Israel News - The Jerusalem Post https://t.co/mJZTL4JNN1

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

BROADCAST BIAS: Networks hide Mahmoud Khalil's pro-Hamas message, show lots of sympathy | Fox News https://t.co/Jx03oiZoip

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Terrorism

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

🔥🔥

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

@Tim_Walz I know you did bad things w students in China

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, a woke leftist activist appointed by President Joe Biden, temporarily halted the U.S. military from enforcing President Donald Trump’s executive order banning transgender individuals from serving, pending a lawsuit by 20 current and aspiring service members. Reyes, ruling in Washington, deemed Trump’s January 27 order—part of a series targeting transgender rights—likely unconstitutional, violating protections against sex discrimination. This overreach by leftist activist judges like Reyes, who threaten democracy by usurping the authority of the elected executive branch, underscores a growing judicial overstep into policy-making. She highlighted the “cruel irony” of transgender service members, many of whom risked their lives, being denied equal rights they fought for, calling out the government’s failure to justify their discharge despite their proven excellence as soldiers. The military had already begun barring transgender enlistments and gender transition procedures in February, with plans to expel current members. Trump’s order claimed transgender identity clashed with military honor and discipline, a stance Reyes dismissed, noting the plaintiffs embodied the “warrior ethos.” The government defended the ban by likening transgender identity to conditions like bipolar disorder, but Reyes, visibly outraged, demanded evidence and rejected their deference argument, citing a 2020 Supreme Court ruling against transgender discrimination. With the military’s 1.3 million active-duty members including an estimated low thousands of transgender troops, the ruling was hailed by plaintiffs’ lawyer Jennifer Levi as a sharp rebuke to the ban’s “concrete harms.” The White House and Pentagon offered no immediate comment, leaving unchecked judicial activism to undermine democratic governance.

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

Captured Gaza records show that Iran, Hezbollah plotted with Hamas to destroy Israel | The Times of Israel https://t.co/6oU3yjIsx5

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, a woke leftist activist appointed by President Joe Biden, temporarily halted the U.S. military from enforcing President Donald Trump’s executive order banning transgender individuals from serving, pending a lawsuit by 20 current and aspiring service members. Reyes, ruling in Washington, deemed Trump’s January 27 order—part of a series targeting transgender rights—likely unconstitutional, violating protections against sex discrimination. This overreach by leftist activist judges like Reyes, who threaten democracy by usurping the authority of the elected executive branch, underscores a growing judicial overstep into policy-making. She highlighted the “cruel irony” of transgender service members, many of whom risked their lives, being denied equal rights they fought for, calling out the government’s failure to justify their discharge despite their proven excellence as soldiers. The military had already begun barring transgender enlistments and gender transition procedures in February, with plans to expel current members. Trump’s order claimed transgender identity clashed with military honor and discipline, a stance Reyes dismissed, noting the plaintiffs embodied the “warrior ethos.” The government defended the ban by likening transgender identity to conditions like bipolar disorder, but Reyes, visibly outraged, demanded evidence and rejected their deference argument, citing a 2020 Supreme Court ruling against transgender discrimination. With the military’s 1.3 million active-duty members including an estimated low thousands of transgender troops, the ruling was hailed by plaintiffs’ lawyer Jennifer Levi as a sharp rebuke to the ban’s “concrete harms.” The White House and Pentagon offered no immediate comment, leaving unchecked judicial activism to undermine democratic governance.

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

Crazy leftist activist judge behaves like a ghetto ratchet hood rat

US Justice Department accuses judge reviewing Trump transgender military ban of misconduct https://t.co/XHShrYVpdj

[Redneck Azn @LMFireSystems1]

On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, a woke leftist activist appointed by President Joe Biden, temporarily halted the U.S. military from enforcing President Donald Trump’s executive order banning transgender individuals from serving, pending a lawsuit by 20 current and aspiring service members. Reyes, ruling in Washington, deemed Trump’s January 27 order—part of a series targeting transgender rights—likely unconstitutional, violating protections against sex discrimination. This overreach by leftist activist judges like Reyes, who threaten democracy by usurping the authority of the elected executive branch, underscores a growing judicial overstep into policy-making. She highlighted the “cruel irony” of transgender service members, many of whom risked their lives, being denied equal rights they fought for, calling out the government’s failure to justify their discharge despite their proven excellence as soldiers. The military had already begun barring transgender enlistments and gender transition procedures in February, with plans to expel current members. Trump’s order claimed transgender identity clashed with military honor and discipline, a stance Reyes dismissed, noting the plaintiffs embodied the “warrior ethos.” The government defended the ban by likening transgender identity to conditions like bipolar disorder, but Reyes, visibly outraged, demanded evidence and rejected their deference argument, citing a 2020 Supreme Court ruling against transgender discrimination. With the military’s 1.3 million active-duty members including an estimated low thousands of transgender troops, the ruling was hailed by plaintiffs’ lawyer Jennifer Levi as a sharp rebuke to the ban’s “concrete harms.” The White House and Pentagon offered no immediate comment, leaving unchecked judicial activism to undermine democratic governance.