On this topic for other types of detail and multiple other examples, also see https://t.co/nIjbt8RqGj
The answer is YES!
If only someone would ask the right question.
@OutOfTheDarkAge@h@jjcouey@AboutIndia @Rama35008819 1/29 A thread on vaccinations and
Mutant Ninja Variants.
28 to 30 tweets. I’m posting it backwards. I have bad luck w getting Threads in order, or maybe I just have bad luck when it comes to thinking. CWD in moose?
Like the majority of vaccines now….well, my mind is jumping all over the place with just this question.
#1 - I think people need to understand how patient level data collected in a clinical trial gets from the Patient➡️Sponsor➡️FDA for review.
It’s the biggest scam EVER!
I’ll write this up more soon!
🚨What does overturning Chevron mean? Let's consider an actual case involving FDA - Bruesewitz v. Wyeth
Background: The case involved Hannah Bruesewitz, who suffered seizures & developmental problems after receiving a DTP vaccine manufactured by Wyeth, now a part of Pfizer. The family sued Wyeth, claiming the vaccine was defectively designed.
Legal Context: The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 established a no-fault compensation program for vaccine injury claims & removed the liability of vaccine manufacturers.
The FDA's role in approving vaccines & its interpretation of safety standards were central to the case.
Court's Decision: In 2011, SCOTUS ruled in favor of Wyeth, holding that the NCVIA preempts all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs seeking compensation for injury or death caused by vaccine side effects.
Chevron Deference Aspect: The court acknowledged FDA's expertise & regulatory authority in approving & monitoring vaccines. The court implicitly deferred to the FDA's judgment that vaccines are safe & effective when they meet regulatory standards, thus preempting state law claims based on design defects.
What are the implications of overruling Chevron Deference:
Courts would independently interpret the NCVIA & other relevant laws without automatically deferring to the FDA's expertise. WIN!!
Plaintiffs might be more likely to challenge FDA approved vaccines in court, arguing that the FDA's safety standards or approval processes are insufficient or flawed. WIN!!
Courts would scrutinize FDA decisions more closely, likely leading to different outcomes in cases involving vaccine injuries or side effects. WIN!!
Vaccine manufacturers will face more uncertainty regarding liability & regulatory standards impacting vaccine development & availability. WIN!!
@Pravduh15 @nikki_novax @KathMLee1@politiyogini@IamBrookJackson Also, the RNA codon sequence might show an anomalous distribution of synonymous versus non-synonymous codons. It has been a marker for lab origin of new variants - and if found, then "vaccine" escape is a less likely explanation @defendliberti
Wastewater samples notwithstanding
Withholding organ transplants for COVID shots is NoT based on science, evidence, or outcomes.
It is based on propaganda.
@MayoClinic is pure evil allowing this to happen.
I’ve also had patients tell me they withhold chemo unless vaxxed to the max also.
@I_Am_JohnCullen@Diamondthedave 2/2 leave us to wonder whether it's psy-op or not
Will happen in 10-50 years😳
Fortunately, ∃ real scientists watching the sun. Their opinions (none of them climate alarmists) are worth following - if any communications stay up.
Ready?
We are advanced civilization idiots
@I_Am_JohnCullen@DiamondtheDave has been saying this for years. With the Sun in a Grand Solar Minimum, the rare events may be more impactful, as the Geo-Solar magnetic field is weaker (and meanwhile there is an excursion of the magnetic North Pole, als weaking) This event WILL happen & leave 1/2
I see this as nothing more than a targeted insult to those who have been injured by these injections and those who lost their lives. @piersmorgan this isn't the flex you think it is. The injured and dead were NOT "antivaxxers" 🤡🤡🤡 People who did not take these injections due to serious concerns weren't "antivaxxers"
Make sure you archive the Oxford Astrazeneca Wikipedia page. So many lies. The CAS Number link has already been deleted.
Archive DrugBank, UNII, & KEGG info before its deleted.
https://t.co/FVAFZ4ZQY2
Yeah, well he is still an idiot - not a 5-D chess player - when it comes to choosing his staff & associates; still a bit of a flimflam man, but yeah,
He makes sense.
Those who attack him are the same that shipped jobs overseas & let our infrastructure and industrial base decay.
Sadly half the country will never hear the truth about this. But that won’t make it any less true. The most blatant political interference in an election in the history of this country.
I think maybe I have some potential microclots in my sinoatrial node
Clots has given me a theoretical atrial bigeminy which showed clearly on a Holter monitor
Possibly I have some conspiratorial medical concerns.
& that was just CoV2. Alpha Variant
Good thing I never got 1/2
🥀 Tip Toe Through the Tulips 🥀
Pay attention to Dr. Whinge 👀 & the phrases he uses here. He is reading from a carefully prepared script, likely created by a PR firm, or the network's attorneys. Let's 👁🗨
Whinge begins the answer glancing down, associating >
The Notice of Liability delivered to individuals at the W.H.O. this week
low, you will find the text of the Notice of Liability delivered to Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Dr Maria van Kerkhove, Dr Janet Diaz, and Jeremy Farrar this week. It was drafted with the help of specialist international lawyers and health scientists. Feel free to copy, paste, and adapt it to notify others of their liability in relation to the COVID-19 fraud.
||📷
Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus: a man
dba: Director General World Health Organisation (WHO)
Office of the Director General
Avenue Appia 20
Dear Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (hereafter ‘you’),
Re: Notice upon Harm and to Cease and Desist
On behalf of living men, women, and all their sons and daughters living right now and those yet to be born on Earth, we hereby place you: a man, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, doing business as the Director General of the World Health Organisation (hereafter W.H.O), on notice that:
Your actions carried out in the capacity of Director General of the W.H.O during the Covid-19 chapter, principally consisting of falsely informing world governments of a so-called pandemic, thereby causing governments to declare non-existent medical emergencies, have been and are still an integral part of a chain of events that is resulting in mass loss of life, immense physical harm and untold psychological distress and trauma to the people on this planet;
Said actions appear to have led to Governments deploying insufficiently tested SARS-CoV-2 genetically modified organisms (GMOs) falsely termed ‘vaccines’ being also gene therapies, mandating unscientific masking protocols, implementing inhumane and anti-scientific ‘social distancing’ measures, purchasing and deploying ineffective and fraudulent PCR tests subsequently used to create false ‘casedemics’ in order to justify unlawful ‘lockdowns’, business closures and house arrest;
We demand that you cease and desist from taking further actions that would involve false and fraudulent communication to governments, thereby causing or resulting in further instances of the catastrophic outcomes outlined above.
Notice of Personal Liability
We also put you on notice that failure to cease or desist from continued or repeated involvement or implication in the above harms shall render you liable both in your personal and corporate capacity. As a man, you shall be investigated for criminal conspiracy. As a corporate officer, you shall be investigated for gross negligence, serious misconduct in public office, corporate fraud and potentially even aiding and abetting corporate manslaughter.
In addition to the above Notices, and to clarify our position, may we take this opportunity respectfully to remind you of your own position and legal responsibilities?
WHO Constitutional Obligation
The objective of the World Health Organization (WHO), according to Article 1 of the WHO Constitution, is the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.1 Thus, in your role as WHO Director-General, you are obliged to consult with a diversity of experts, including those who disagree with your recommendations on health, to ensure that best practice is ethically and objectively promoted to uphold the best interests of the public.
As early as 2021, international experts were cautioning against the novel COVID strategies recommended by the WHO Covid team, especially but not limited to the experimental modRNA medical technologies developed at ‘warp speed’ to function purportedly as vaccines.
The WHO Constitution states in Article 67 that members may enjoy ‘such privileges and immunities as may be necessary for the fulfilment of its objective and for the exercise of its functions.' Such privileges and immunity, whilst patently unfair, inequitable, and dangerous, only apply when fulfilling the Article 1 objective.
By your unilateral recommendation of harmful Covid strategies, The People, represented by the World Council for Health, do not believe that you acted in accordance with your constitutional obligations in Article 1. If your actions are found to be in contravention of Article 1, you will not be covered by Article 67 of the WHO Constitution, which provides for the stated protection and immunity. In other words, you may be personally liable for the millions of deaths and immense suffering caused on account of your role in the unlawful authorisation of these harmful recommendations. Moreover, given the blatant conflicts of interest evident in the WHO’s activities, which are closely connected to commercial interests, immunity is not guaranteed when acting at the behest of those interests.
Consequences of your WHO COVID Policies, Recommendations, Advice, and Omissions
1. Immeasurable suffering and death
In the past four years, billions of people who trusted and complied with WHO-based country government advice have experienced ongoing physical and mental suffering, illness, disability, loss of income, poverty, child abuse, other violence, and even death as a result.
2. Human rights violations
Country governments worldwide implemented severe emergency measures directly based on WHO recommendations that consequently resulted in widespread violations of fundamental human rights. Boys, girls, and babies were masked and injected. Living men and women expressing or wishing to express their right to free speech, travel, bodily autonomy, and to choose were threatened, intimidated, coerced, neglected, abused, and in some cases, assaulted, imprisoned, or killed. The WHO did nothing to address the harm it caused.
3. Failure to recommend inexpensive, safe, and effective treatments and remedies for Covid-19
COVID-19 can be effectively treated with safe and established multi-purpose generic medicines, including ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine, in combination with zinc, vitamin D, vitamin C, and other immune-boosting, health-promoting and anti-coagulant treatments. Failure to disclose and raise awareness of these, and failure to recommend ivermectin widely in combination with zinc for early use, meant that millions of people suffered and many died as a result of not being offered effective early and late treatments.
By recommending ivermectin only in the context of clinical trials and omitting sound and practical advice on how to attain the highest level of health during the Covid-19 scare, ivermectin and other effective treatments were withheld in many countries in favour of expensive GMO drugs, emergency-authorized patented pharmaceutical drugs without safety records. Thus, in your personal capacity, the world’s people may hold you responsible for the consequences of serious omissions related to safe, effective treatments for COVID-19, in preference for undisclosed GMOs.
4. Dangerous GMO gene therapies deployed in the guise of vaccines
You may also be personally liable for death, loss and suffering in relation to the SARS-CoV-2 ‘vaccines’ as you have not advised people of the following:
The long-term material risks of these ‘vaccines’ are unknown. The LNP-modRNA platform fulfils EU, UK, South African, Australian, and US legal definitions for being properly deemed a genetically modified organism (GMO), and a gene therapy, where material risks are identified over a period up to 15 years and perhaps into offspring. People were not advised as required by law that the so-called ‘vaccines’ are, in fact, GMOs.
Pfizer used one process to manufacture the products they submitted for approval but a different process to manufacture the product supplied for injection into the world’s people. The latter product was manufactured using E. coli bacteria and plasmid DNA, which has resulted in excessive synthetic DNA contamination confirmed as able to integrate with the human genome. Moderna’s use of plasmid DNA in manufacture has also led to excessive synthetic DNA contamination.
Pfizer products include an SV40 virus-derived enhancer gene sequence. This gene sequence is known to facilitate the transport of synthetic DNA into cell nuclei, posing a real risk of chromosomal integration. This threatens permanent genetic modification of inoculated people without their knowledge or consent and can only be harmful.
The contents of these genetic injections do not stay in the arm muscle.
Spike proteins are produced for a prolonged and unknown period of time, possibly indefinitely.
These spike proteins trigger extensive microvascular blood clotting as well as large vessel blood clots.
Spike proteins are deposited in many tissues and organs, including the heart, brain, testis, ovaries, liver, and spleen, causing tissue degeneration and disease.
The large quantity of spike proteins may overwhelm the immune system, causing immune system dysfunction and worsening risk of all infections and cancers.
The spike protein is toxic in itself, but this foreign antigen also marks the victims’ own tissues as non-self, triggering autoimmune disease within these tissues.
The antibodies generated are non-neutralizing and worsen Covid disease; this is “antibody-dependent enhancement” of infection.
Undeclared plasmid DNA in these products carries further dangers, especially in the case of Pfizer and the concealed SV40 enhancer and promotor sequences. This includes the disruption of tumour suppressor genes, and adds to the list of mechanisms by which these products increase cancer risk.
The artificial modRNA in these products is hyper-persistent due to the substitution of N1-methylpsudouridine in place of uracil. This prolongs the production of the toxic spike proteins, but also causes ribosome frame shifting, such that a variety of unpredictable proteins and polypeptides are also generated. These pose serious risk for triggering a large spectrum of autoimmune diseases.
Additionally the pegylated lipid nanoparticles, which deliver the genetic payload into the victims’ cells, are toxic in and of themselves.
5. Violation of informed consent
Based on your authority as the designated WHO Director General, the majority of people around the world trusted your words when you stated that Covid-19 GMOs and gene therapies were “safe and effective”. This claim cannot be substantiated and is further disproved by Covid-19 vaccine contracts. As such, the right to free and informed consent was violated for every human being who was injected with the experimental Covid-19 GMO gene therapy called ‘vaccines’.
In addition, it appears that at no point did you appraise people of the risks associated with these experimental GMO injections, nor have you shared the mounting vaccine injury reports with the public. Vigibase, the WHO pharmacovigilance collaboration with the University of Uppsala, holds the records of over five million people suspected of harm due to the Covid-19 genetic ‘vaccines’, yet you have failed to demand and ensure transparent, independent and timely analysis of these data.
This is in direct contravention of the Nuremberg Code, that was agreed to in 1948, to prevent non-consensual medical experimentation on human beings, following gross human rights violations during the Second World War.2 Your failure to advise on, recommend, promote and ensure free and informed consent for these Covid-19 GMO gene therapies can be prosecuted for both breach of your duty of care as well as for battery.
World Council for Health Invitation
It is our opinion that the health of the world’s people is much poorer because of the actions that you have taken during the course of your work responsibilities at the World Health Organization. In the circumstances, we are morally obliged to invite you to defend your actions or apologize publicly with a plan for reparations. A World Council for Health Country Council General Assembly is scheduled to take place on May 21, 2024, to hear your response and to agree on further necessary actions.
In the interim and in the future, we demand that you cease and desist from spreading disinformation about the Covid-19 GMO gene therapy products with immediate effect.
By the men and women named below:
World Council for Health Steering Committee
Shabnam Palesa Mohamed (WCH Africa), Fahrie Hassan (WCH Africa), Emma Sron (WCH N. America), Dr.Marivic Villa (WCH N. Americas), Dr. Mark Trozzi (WCH N. America), Izumi Kamijo (WCH Asia), Rev. Dr. Wai Ching Lee (WCH Asia), Dr. Gilbertha St Rose (WCH Caribbean), Christof Plothe DO (WCH Europe), Dr. Mazen Nasreddine (WCH Levant), Lucinda van Buuren (WCH Oceania), Dr. Anne O’Reilly (WCH Oceania), Prof. Héctor Carvallo (WCH Latin America), Marco Albertazzi (WCH Latin America), Dr. Tess Lawrie (WCH Chief Coordinator)
A
Get in-depth analysis and insights without the bias of mainstream media. We are dedicated to keeping you informed and free. Visit https://t.co/CiIF0CTMpY to get reporting you won’t find anywhere else.
Subscribe to our 2x/month magazine for 25% off your first year.
@gov_fails@KoliMitra 2/2. My second firing was by Sheboygan Co, WI, for advising against the third Jab, deemed a "breach of contract".
Public Health Dept, September 2022. Scottish data already showed immune compromise.
Save a life maybe? Or save your job?