Let’s see how the draft progresses in the Council and what the Democracy Shield – to be announced in November – can add to defend European democracy.
The draft report will be discussed and voted on in the 24-27 November EP plenary session. 6/6
https://t.co/QadIaz1d1q
The EP's Internal Market Committee has just adopted a report on the draft directive on transparency of third country interest representation.
The directive is intended to counter foreign interference by introducing national transparency registers for foreign lobbying. 🧵1/
Overall, I think this is quite a balanced compromise. It tackles the most difficult areas of the draft well. However, the fact that transparency registers are unlikely to be effective in addressing foreign interference overall remains. 5/
🗓️Next Thursday, on Oct 16, in @EP_SingleMarket
🗳️Votes
🔸Protection of minors online
🔸Interest representation of 3rd countries
🔍Debates & scrutiny sessions
🔸Political Advertising
🔸Market surveillance & product compliance
🔸Empowering consumers for the green transition
Wie steht es um die Demokratie in Europa und welche Rolle kann die deutsch-französische Zusammenarbeit bei ihrem Schutz spielen - diese und andere Fragen durfte ich gestern mit @rc_schneider und @PeterRNeumann in der @FranzBotschaft besprechen. Danke für die spannende Diskussion!
Danke an @PeterRNeumann und @rc_schneider für die Vorstellung ihres neues Buches @FranzBotschaft und an Luise Quaritsch @DelorsBerlin für die spannende Diskussion über die Möglichkeiten, die Europa und dem 🇩🇪-🇫🇷 Tandem zur Verfügung stehen, um unsere Demokratie zu verteidigen!
Danke an @PeterRNeumann und @rc_schneider für die Vorstellung ihres neues Buches @FranzBotschaft und an Luise Quaritsch @DelorsBerlin für die spannende Diskussion über die Möglichkeiten, die Europa und dem 🇩🇪-🇫🇷 Tandem zur Verfügung stehen, um unsere Demokratie zu verteidigen!
I also wrote a longer policy brief on the topic here.
The file is set to be voted on in the European Parliament's Internal Market Committee on 25 September.
https://t.co/pQO2preie9
Yesterday, the WSJ reported that Denmark summoned the U.S. envoy to Copenhagen over an alleged covert influence campaign in Greenland, aimed at garnering support for Trump's plans to purchase the island.
https://t.co/B482D8k5bP
In Politico's EU Influence Newsletter by @MariEccles, I commented on why the Directive is unlikely to substantially address the issue of foreign meddling though.
https://t.co/DMjudf4wpS
This is not a matter of different understandings of 'free speech' in the EU and US, as is sometimes suggested in the media. Rather than acting out of genuine concern over fundamental rights, the US gov. is pushing a narrative that suits its political and geoeconomic interests 6/6
The US government is once again ramping up its rhetoric on the EU’s Digital Services Act. It is now reportedly considering imposing sanctions on Commission staff responsible for implementing the DSA. This would be an unprecedented move. 🧵⬇️
https://t.co/LRAFAZprzc
'The DSA is censorship' is the narrative the US gov. is using as a justification, a claim that has little to no basis in reality. The DSA only provides a framework on how platforms have to deal with e.g. illegal content. What is illegal is defined in national or other EU laws. 5/