Earlier this week, the Clerk hosted the Speaker of the Parliament of Vanuatu and a distinguished delegation.
This visit marks a special milestone in our 15-year twinning relationship, celebrating a bond of friendship and cooperation between our Parliaments. 🤝🌏
A privilege to attend yesterday’s launch of ‘Political Lives,’ which explores the complex relationship between PMs, their biographies & biographers. Raving review from Treasurer, @JEChalmers. Thanks to wonderful hosts, @UniCanberra & @paddynixon. And well done @c_s_wallace! ⭐️
@DrBeeZee@ANUBellSchool@ANUmedia That background... Are you perched on top of Mount Ainslie? 🤔😅 In all seriousness, morning shows are about as impactful as it gets (just ask @MrKRudd). And sensible thoughts in times where any divergence at all from the dominant narrative takes courage. Much respect, @DrBeeZee.
@SeanMolloyIR Richard Rorty in 1999 on the “Nietzscheanized left”: “I’m willing to bet that the brightest new Ph.D.’s in English that year [2010] will be people who never want to hear the terms ‘binary opposition’ or ‘hegemonic discourse’ again as long as they live.”
@bwmoles Ahhh, the ethical complexities when contingencies are added! And, VERY strange to think about the Sliding Doors scenario... The (potential) world-altering powers of pushing a pedestrian button 🤯
A question for philosophers and #twitterstorians alike. When a political historian writes a book reflecting on their craft (👇), what kind of discipline or genre would you say they are engaged in? It’s not quite history as such, but nor is it necessarily ‘philosophy’ or ‘theory.’
Say Elton says:
—politics comprises actions & contexts of action;
—take care to distinguish words of politicians from deeds/motives;
—be aware of the powers/limitations of politicians.
What kind of ‘knowledge’ is this? Because it’s similar to what some ‘political theorists’ do.
@SoniaMRobaey Except when historiographies clash, right? And Elton’s book, and others like it, seem very much to support a certain way of doing history, and thinking historically. 🤷♂️
@agtgibson Trying to pin it all down is a headache. So for now I’m just describing them as offering similar “intellectual techniques,” designed to “prime” readers to think about and evaluate politics in a certain way, to prioritise certain questions, concerns, and skill sets, etc. 🤷♂️
@agtgibson One thing I find endlessly fascinating is the similarity between anti-systematic political theorists/philosophers like Raymond Geuss and Bernard Williams in the way they prime readers to think about politics, and political historians like Elton when they reflect on their craft.
@Rory_Medcalf@ConstantinoX Well spotted @Rory_Medcalf, but take a look, about half way through, and also toward the very end, when a scooter rides past, followed by a car. There’s a largish drop-off behind the red bricks, which I think explains why the shadow stops there.