LSalomon

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@LethalLauren904 I never harassed you or tried to blow up your notifications. I followed your content because I enjoyed it and, for the first time, disagreed with your take on this case. I simply expected more objectivity from someone who presents themselves as a neutral cc.

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@LethalLauren904 That approach feels more like advocacy than analysis.
Replying here since my comment magically disappeared from your video.

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@LethalLauren904 objective analysis.
I don't object to you believing the conviction was correct. What I object to is presenting that belief as though it is the only rational interpretation of the evidence, while characterizing competing views as lies, insanity, or internet fiction.

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@LethalLauren904 Whether race affected the verdict is a fair subject for debate, but race was undeniably part of the public discussion surrounding this case. Dismissing those concerns outright, while ignoring evidence and statements that contributed to those concerns, does not strike me as

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@LethalLauren904 before the stabbing. The video captures only a portion of the encounter and does not provide the full context of everything that led up to it. Saying "this is what happened" based primarily on that footage oversimplifies the case.
I was also disappointed by your treatment of race

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@LethalLauren904 opportunities that may have been missed. A jury verdict resolves the legal case; it does not automatically settle every factual dispute or interpretation surrounding it.
You also focus heavily on the released video while largely dismissing or minimizing events that occurred

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@LethalLauren904 What ultimately caused me to lose confidence in your objectivity is that you repeatedly blur the line between facts and conclusions. You present the verdict as if it was the only reasonable outcome, when there are legitimate questions about how the defense was presented and

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@LethalLauren904 I think some of your factual points are supported by the record, but I find the overall presentation disingenuous. You present your interpretation of the evidence as though it is the definitive account of what happened, rather than one interpretation of a complex case.
..

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@CelebDockets She took over the IEWU movie and now she's taking over this bill.

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@judyju18 Seek help. You need it.

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@drugproblem @justinbaldoni Blake stans=idiots

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@FizzyCuteness Not reports. Text messages on the docket. EVIDENCE

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@chriswatso7584 @LadyColinCampb You need a psych evaluation. 😆 🤣 😂

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@NicoleEvans1982 @piersmorgan STFU idiot. All claims against him were gone. These were 3 claims against the entities. Stupid. He I'm sure had to pay nothing

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@ABQBearsGrl89 This sh t can't be real! What a POS.

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@luxemiaa You're shitty human.

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@nomodeath Ok.

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@Markfolklore @TMZ You're stupid af.

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@Capitana_espana Ignorante

[LSalomon @LSalomon2919]

@JulesVerne29 @piersmorgan @blakelively Wtf! What order did you read? Lol sh and 9 other claims are out, on merit. Smfh