City Slicker

God provides
Jesus is my King 👑
1A, 2A 🔫
Constitution
No mandatory 💉

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

Babies are born with LOW vitamin K on purpose — it’s not a flaw. It’s God’s perfect design.

Cord blood is packed with stem cells specifically meant to repair the physical stress and micro-trauma of birth.

Low vitamin K keeps the blood naturally thin so those stem cells can flow freely and travel exactly where they’re needed — to heal tissues, support organ repair, and jumpstart the newborn’s developing systems without premature clotting getting in the way.

God made it this way so the baby’s own cord blood stem cells can circulate optimally in those critical first moments and hours.

Thin blood = maximum mobility for healing. High clotting factors right at birth would slow or trap those precious stem cells, interfering with their God-given job.

Benefits of lower vitamin K at birth (by design):
• Stem cells & cord blood: Allows unrestricted travel of hematopoietic stem cells throughout the body to repair birth trauma, reduce inflammation, and support tissue regeneration.
• Immune system: Cord blood stem cells help establish and strengthen the newborn’s naive immune system. Low vitamin K ensures they reach the bone marrow, thymus, and other sites without clotting interference.
• Neurological & organ protection: Stem cells can migrate to the brain and vital organs to protect against the oxidative stress of labor and delivery.
• Natural timing: Colostrum (that first “liquid gold”) is rich in natural vitamin K — delivered orally, slowly, and gently through breastfeeding exactly when the baby needs it. God’s perfect dose at the perfect moment.

Instead, we cut the cord early (stealing up to 30-40% of the baby’s blood volume and those vital stem cells), then inject synthetic vitamin K loaded with polysorbate 80, propylene glycol, benzyl alcohol, and sometimes aluminum — straight into an immune system that’s barely online.

Why are we “fixing” what God already designed perfectly?

Think about it before you consent.
Nature doesn’t make mistakes. God doesn’t either.
Delay cord clamping. Keep the cord blood. Trust colostrum. Respect the design.

Your baby’s body was fearfully and wonderfully made. ❤️

[Nicolas Hulscher, MPH @NicHulscher]

CDC SLAMMED WITH FEDERAL LAWSUIT FOR OPERATING ILLEGAL 72-DOSE CHILDHOOD VACCINATION PROGRAM

NEVER tested for cumulative safety.

NEVER filed the legally-required safety reports.

This lawsuit could DISMANTLE the CDC’s unlawful vaccine regime that has poisoned the nation.

[City Slicker @LTPhotog]

@Her_Nonymous_D As an Uber driver myself, I would have stopped and told the men to get out if they started arguing with me. No way would I have taken the girls to their home (if that is where they went) giving the men knowledge of where the girls lived.

[Alexander Duncan @AlexDuncanTX]

How quickly people forget that Satan was kicked out of Heaven for pride.

[Old Salty Marine @BamaSaltyMarine]

HISTORY LESSON ON YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY CARD:
Just in case some of you young whippersnappers (& some older ones) didn’t know this. It’s easy to check out, if you don’t believe it. Be sure and show it to your family and friends. They need a little history lesson on what’s what and it doesn’t matter whether you are Democrat or Republican. Facts are FACTS.

Up until the 1980's, Social Security cards expressly stated the number and card were not to be used for identification purposes.
Since nearly everyone in the United States now has a number, it became convenient to use it anyway and the "NOT FOR IDENTIFICATION" message was removed.

Franklin Roosevelt, a Democrat, introduced the Social Security (FICA) Program. His promises are in black, with updates in brackets.

1.) That participation in the Program would be completely voluntary [No longer voluntary],

2.) That the participants would only have to pay 1% of the first $1,400 of their annual Incomes into the Program [Now 7.65% on the first $90,000, and 15% on the first $90,000 if you’re self-employed],

3.) That the money the participants elected to put into the Program would be deductible from their income for tax purposes each year [No longer tax deductible]

4.) That the money the participants put into the independent ‘Trust Fund’ rather than into the general operating fund, and therefore, would only be used to fund the Social Security Retirement Program, and no other Government program [Under Johnson the money was moved to the General Fund and spent]

5.) That the annuity payments to the retirees would never be taxed as income [Under Clinton & Gore up to 85% of your Social Security can be taxed].

Since many of us have paid into FICA for years and are now receiving a Social Security check every month — and then finding that we are getting taxed on 85% of the money we paid to the Federal government to ‘put away’ — you may be interested in the following.

Q: Which Political Party took Social Security from the independent ‘Trust Fund’ and put it into the general fund so that Congress could spend it?

A: It was Lyndon Johnson and the democratically controlled House and Senate.

Q: Which Political Party eliminated the income tax deduction for Social Security (FICA) withholding?

A: The Democratic Party.

Q: Which Political Party started taxing Social Security annuities?

A: The Democratic Party, with Al Gore casting the ‘tie-breaking’ deciding vote as President of the Senate, while he was Vice President of the US

AND MY FAVORITE:

Q: Which Political Party decided to start giving annuity payments to immigrants?

A: That’s right! Jimmy Carter and the Democratic Party. Immigrants moved into this country, and at age 65, began to receive Social Security payments!

The Democratic Party gave these payments to them, even though they never paid a dime into it!

Now, after violating the original contract (FICA), the Democrats turn around and tell you that the Republicans want to take your Social Security away!

And the worst part about it is uninformed citizens believe it!

If enough people receive this, maybe a seed of awareness will be planted and maybe changes will evolve. Maybe not, though.

Some Democrats are awfully sure of what isn’t so but it’s worth a try.

How many people can YOU send this to?

[ARMY1325AIR @army1325air]

There’s a storm brewing in America, and this week was just the spark.

Millions of us were raised on freedom, family, faith, and the right to live our lives without government breathing down our necks.

We support President Trump.
We respect his courage.
But we are not a cult.

Our loyalty belongs to God, our families, our country, and the future we’re fighting for.

That means when something is wrong, we call it out — even from people we support.

Silence is how nations fall.
Courage is how they rise.

I’m just like you.
Working.
Stressed.
Fed up.
Watching politicians forget they work for us.

So get loud.
Be proud.
Speak truth.
Post more.
Push back with your voice.

We are not here to be ruled.
We are not here to be silenced.
We are not here to watch our children inherit a weaker country because we were too afraid to speak.

For our families.
For our country.
For our future.

Who’s with me?

[Valerie Anne Smith @ValerieAnne1970]

Dr. Jeff Barke: “This is insane!” — VAXELIS 6 VACCINES in ONE SHOT for 6-WEEK-OLD BABIES...6 Infants Died In Trials.

Here’s what Big Pharma doesn’t want you to know:

• 6 vaccines in ONE (DTaP, Polio, Hib, Hep B) for infants starting at 6 weeks old.
• Epinephrine and emergency equipment MUST be ready because anaphylactic shock can happen instantly.
• Institute of Medicine confirms causal link to Guillain-Barré Syndrome (full-body paralysis) and brachial neuritis (shoulder/arm paralysis).
• Apnea warning: Babies can suddenly STOP BREATHING after the shot — often labeled “SIDS.”
• 319 micrograms of aluminum (a known neurotoxin) plus formaldehyde, bovine serum albumin, neomycin, streptomycin, polymyxin B… and Vero monkey kidney cells.
• ZERO placebo-controlled safety studies — they only tested it against other vaccines.
• 6 infants DIED in the trials.
• NEVER tested for cancer, mutations, fertility damage, pregnancy, or breastmilk effects.

Dr. Barke’s words: “This is insane!”

If parents actually read the insert, NO ONE in their right mind would inject their child.

Share this with every parent you know. Read the full package insert yourself. Your baby’s life depends on it.

[City Slicker @LTPhotog]

@braves2430 Runza casserole

[City Slicker @LTPhotog]

@Sassafrass_84 This goes with the one above. Guess what happened.

[City Slicker @LTPhotog]

@Sassafrass_84

[Jack Straw @JackStr42679640]

"Most impressive of all is Ivermectin Cream will completely clear skin Cancers...Basal Cell Carcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma & Melanoma will heal & fall off."

"Topical Ivermectin will heal any inflammatory or Autoimmune skin condition including Rosacea, Cystic Acne & Eczema."

~Dr. William Makis, radiologist, oncologist & cancer researcher.

Ivermectin has anti-inflammatory, anti-viral, anti-bacterial & anti-tumor properties.

Ivermectin has amazing topical applications...skin cancers disappearing after a few weeks of applying it twice a day...the skin cancer literally falls off.

People with the worst type of cystic acne are completely clearing that lifelong painful debilitating condition.

Ivermectin is a pretty fascinating veritable wonder drug. It’s primarily known as a broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent with multiple mechanisms of action.

The story of its discovery, in the 1960s when Satoshi Ōmura stumbled upon a unique soil bacteria. This bacteria produced something called avermectin, & ivermectin is essentially a synthetic derivative of this component.

Ivermectin Cream Treats These Dermatology Conditions:
Rosacea
Eczema
Psoriasis
Facial Mites
Scabies
Demodex Skin Mites
Perioral Dermatitis
Hookworms
Lice
Basal Cell Carcinoma
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Melanoma
Moles
Warts
Skin Tags
Ringworm
Candida
Athlete's Foot

Purchasing Topical Ivermectin Cream In 1 of 2 Ways:

#1: Doctor Rx Prescription for 1% cream...pharmacy filled & purchased after doctor visit or diagnosis.

#2: Over The Counter private purchase of 1.87% cream at any veterinary, pet or farm supply store for immediate use. Available for immediate purchase online on sites like Amazon & Major online pet sites. Most creams & pastes sell for under $10 & are ready for immediate use without a doctor visit, copay or pharmacy visit.

Dosage For Over The Counter Private Purchase:

Twice per day, massage in a pea sized/pencil eraser sized amount onto affected area or lesion.

Valerie Anne Smith

[John Fitzgerald Kennedy Jr. @RealMrJohnJr]

AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS IS BEING SUED AS A RICO CASE!

Lying to the public for DECADES about the childhood vaccine schedule and the safety and effectiveness of it.

WHAT THEY HAVE DONE IS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!! It won’t just stop at a lawsuit.

[John Rich🇺🇸 @johnrich]

If you're a landowner, and your land is being targeted by any entity, whether state/local/energy company, etc...Fill out a detailed report at https://t.co/t7MD6vDw5V There is a team looking at every report to determine what can be done. We must protect American farm/ranch land.

[Ananth Rupanagudi @Ananth_IRAS]

Worth a read! 😍

My mom wanted to send me homemade pickles. But I said ‘no’.

I was 27, living in New York, working on Wall Street. I didn't need pickles shipped across the world. The shipping would cost more than buying them here.

Three years later, I read the psychologist take on what I'd actually done. When you reject someone's offer to help, you're not just declining assistance. You're declining their need to matter to you!

Benjamin Franklin figured this out in 1736. He had a rival in the Pennsylvania legislature who hated him. Instead of trying to win him over with favors, Franklin asked the rival to lend him a rare book.

The rival agreed. They became lifelong friends. It's called the Ben Franklin effect.When people do something for you, they convince themselves they must like you. Otherwise, why would they help?

My mom didn't want to send pickles because I needed them.
She wanted to send them because SHE needed to feel useful to me. To feel like despite the ocean between us, she still had a role in my life.

Every time I said "I'll manage," I was taking that away from her. Here's what I learned after a decade of living away from home:

→ Accepting small favors isn't about you needing help.

It's about letting people you love feel needed.

Your dad wants to transfer ₹5000 even though you earn well?

Let him.

Your friend wants to pick you up from the airport even though Uber exists?

Say yes.

Your partner wants to make you tea even though you can make it yourself?

Accept it.

The people who love you don't want to solve your big problems. They want to matter in your small moments.

Let them. #lifelesson

[City Slicker @LTPhotog]

@bekahj Phil Wikham, Forrest Frank

[City Slicker @LTPhotog]

@CPAC @bennyjohnson And our gas keeps going up...

[🌷 LIZZIE🌷 @farmingandJesus]

This was sent to me written by @UnseenWyoGal , I’m sharing for her as I don’t have a character limit , we pray Catholics hear her heart on this 💜

Imagine this:

Your dearest friends - people you love more than life itself - have been kidnapped by a ruthless creditor. They owe an impossible debt they could never pay, and the kidnappers have made it clear: either the debt is paid in full (plus an enormous “insurance” sum to guarantee it never happens again), or your friends will die.

You alone have the means to pay. Out of pure, sacrificial love, you liquidate everything you own. You don’t just write a check - you empty your bank accounts, sell your house, and give your own blood, sweat, and very life if that’s what it takes.

You pay the price a thousand times over. You don’t ask your friends to earn their freedom or pay you back.

All you ask is this: “Remember what I did. Come to me. Talk to me. Live in the freedom I bought for you, and let your lives show that you know the cost.”

The day they’re released, they’re overjoyed. But they never call you. They never look you in the eyes and say, “Thank you for what you paid.”

Instead, they start calling your mother every single day. They praise her endlessly for giving birth to the one who was willing to save them.

They build beautiful shrines in her honor. They write songs and poems about her tenderness and her “yes” that made the rescuer possible.

They ask her to put in a good word for them with you. And at the very end of every long, glowing conversation with her, they sometimes add (almost as an afterthought), “Oh, and please tell your son we’re grateful for what he did.”

They never reach out to you directly.
They never sit with you.
They never let their gratitude rest fully on the one who actually paid the ransom.

How would that feel?

Not because you resent your mother. She’s wonderful! And she did play a beautiful, irreplaceable role in bringing the rescuer into the world.

But because the love, the glory, the relationship, and the direct thank-you that belong to the one who paid everything are being redirected.

The very people you bled for are missing the heart of what you did. Their admiration is sincere, but it’s misplaced. And in being misplaced, it quietly breaks the heart of the one who loved them enough to pay a price they could never pay themselves.

That’s what the constant exaltation of Mary feels like to Jesus.

It’s not that honoring Mary is wrong. It’s that when our songs, our prayers, our devotion, and our deepest gratitude are poured out to her first and most (while Jesus receives only the occasional “and tell your Son thanks”) we have unintentionally done the very thing He never asked for.

We have taken the spotlight off the Savior and placed it on the one who carried Him. The ransom was paid by Him alone. The relationship He died to restore is with Him. And the gratitude He longs for is the kind that runs straight to His arms, not through someone else’s.

That’s the gentle but serious correction the analogy I've ruminated on for days is trying to make: Jesus isn’t threatened by Mary. He’s grieved when the people He redeemed treat His sacrifice as secondary to the honor of the woman who gave Him birth.

[SiriusB @SiriusBShaman]

They did not take cursive from the schools because children no longer needed it. They took it because of what it was quietly building in them.

Consider what the exercise actually is. A child, six years old, is handed a pen and asked to draw a single unbroken line that becomes a word. The wrist must float. The fingers must hold a living pressure, never quite the same twice, always correcting. The eye must follow the ink forward and trust the hand to finish what it has begun. There is no lifting, no stopping, no starting over mid-word. The loop must close. The ascender must rise and return. The sentence must travel from one margin to the other as a single continuous gesture, and at the end of it the hand must still be steady.

Twelve years of this. Every day. Ten thousand small acts of sustained, self-correcting attention, carried out below the level of conscious thought, until the motion belongs to the body and the body belongs to the motion.

This is not penmanship. It is the slow construction of an interior form.

The hand that has learned to carry a line without breaking it is the hand of a mind that has learned to carry a thought without breaking it. The two are not metaphors for one another. They are the same faculty, trained in the same child, by the same daily discipline. Continuity of the stroke becomes continuity of the reasoning. The patience of the loop becomes the patience of the argument. The commitment to finish a word one has started becomes the commitment to finish a sentence, a paragraph, a life's idea, without reaching for the nearest distraction halfway through.

Print is a different creature entirely. Print lifts. Print stops. Print assembles a word out of separate, stamped, interchangeable pieces, each one beginning and ending in isolation. A mind raised only on print learns to think the way print is made, in discrete tokens, in replaceable units, in fragments that can be recombined by any outside hand without the owner noticing the substitution. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model produces. It is precisely the shape of thought a language model can steer.

Cursive is kata. This is the whole of it. A form repeated daily, for years, not for the sake of the form but for what the repetition lays down in the practitioner beneath the form. The swordsman does not train kata so that one day he may fight in kata. He trains it so that when the moment comes and there is no time to think, the movement is already inside him, older and deeper than thought, and it rises on its own. Cursive was the kata of the literate mind, the daily quiet drilling of continuity, of patience, of a line held steady under the long pressure of its own length. And the signature it produced at the end, that small flourished mark unique to a single human being on earth, was only the outward proof of an inward form no machine and no other hand could ever reproduce.

Take the kata away and the practitioner is left with vocabulary in place of faculty. He can recognise a whole thought when he encounters one. He cannot carry one himself. He can admire a finished argument. He cannot sustain one long enough to close its loop. He begins books he does not finish, sentences he does not end, ideas he abandons the moment the screen in his palm offers him a brighter one. And when the machine begins feeding him tokens in the exact shape his schooling taught him to receive, he meets it with no interior resistance at all, because no interior form was ever built in him to push back with.

They removed it quietly, across a generation, and they removed it in the last years before the machines arrived. Twelve years of daily practice in unbroken, embodied, self-authored thought, gone from the curriculum of almost every child in the Western world, just as the instruments designed to complete their sentences for them came online.

The hand forgets. The mind, having never been taught the kata, forgets a thing it never knew it had.

That is what cursive was. That is what was taken. And that is why the thought of anyone who still writes by hand, in long unlifted lines, remains, quietly, stubbornly, and without their ever needing to announce it, their own.

Now the question stands open. What else has been banned, phased out, quietly retired from the curriculum and from common life over these same decades, under the same soft excuses? Mental arithmetic. Memorisation of poetry. Latin. Logic as a formal subject. Map reading. Knot work. The keeping of a commonplace book. The reading aloud of long passages in class. Singing in parts.

What was each of those actually building in the child, beneath the surface of the lesson, and whose interest was served by its disappearance?

[City Slicker @LTPhotog]

@shouq_al90149 Mildred