Lot of these takes that seek to celebrate the depiction of a soft Rama who shuns violence and is soft and borderline timid come from this old trope below...
God suffered in silence on behalf of his people..
God pardons but doesn't confront or attack to kill..
God is non-violent and sacrifice is the ideal he espoused..
I can just say that is a specific imagination of a particular kind of god.. I need not explain which faith it is from..
Everyone is not obligated to pay obeisance to that kind of imagery..
It is a particular kind of imagination juxtaposed on another set of people who carry multiple different imageries of their gods and goddesses..
Our gods and goddesses may punish those who are on the other side of Dharma quite severely. They may go to wars and kill them.
Yes our gods carry weapons. And it is not as a fancy dress competition costume. Those weapons are really put to use when the opponent and the situation demands. Both gods and goddesses indulge in this kind of 'violence' . No patriarchy there. Equal treatment to villains across genders. Villains can be women too. Oppressed gender card won't work for Rakshasis.
The irony is lot more violence has been unleashed in the past few centuries in the name of peace and love on various indigenous peoples as compared to the violence unleashed by this so called violent religion where gods carry weapons and kill their opponents.
But who gets flak?
Make it make sense.
Christian missionaries came to Bengal and described Maa Kali as ‘vile’, ‘sources of vice’
● The Missionary Herald (Baptist Periodical, January 1851), Page 46.
Because the NARRATOR uses words like - " APMANIT " for asurs, war was for SATTA ( which actually Dharm V Adharm). If an asur was narrating this it could be termed this is a biased pov , that's not truth , but when the NARRATOR himself says it , it becomes an OBJECTIVE TRUTH .
Ask a prisoner about jail and he'll say he's being oppressed by the police. That doesn't make him right, especially when he's there for a reason. Same goes for the Asuras. Being in that position doesn't automatically make them victims. How's this even a topic of debate?
After reading all the reviews I think Namitasur is an idiot.
If you want to show Ravana as a layered Villian there are better ways to show it, without going the shoshit vanchit way.
A slight disagreement with Sai ji, movie aim wasn't subversion rather copying the Hollywood superhero industrial complex where anti-hero is provided with sympathetic backstory & elevation. Makers were obsessed with selling it to West hence modelled Ravan after them.
Things I liked about Ramayana:
1. Brahma, Vishnu & Shiva are show are show as cosmic beings made of stars & nebulae, not humanoids.
2. Sita knew how to fight.
3. Ravana had ten personalities in his head instead of having physically ten heads. (1/2)
If you know the capacity of movies for political messaging & use it to elevate politicians,& still call it "just a movie" when it subverts our Itihasas,your priorities are pretty clear. Fealty to politicians & Itihasic liberalism- some Hindutva this is, if it can be called that.
മറ്റുള്ള രാജ്യങ്ങൾ ഇപ്പൊൾ നമ്മളെ അഭിസംബോധന ചെയ്യുന്നത് എങ്ങനെ എന്ന് കണ്ടോ?ഇതൊക്കെയാണ് മാറ്റം നമ്മുടെ പ്രധാനമന്ത്രിയുടെ പേരിൽ മറ്റൊരു രാജ്യത്ത് അറിയപ്പെടുമ്പോൾ അത് നമ്മുടെ കൂടി അഭിമാനം ആണ്.ഈ സ്ത്രീ പറഞ്ഞതാണ് രാജ്യ സ്നേഹം😍അതില്ലാത്തവർ ഇതിന് പല കമൻ്റും ആയി വരും.അവരോട് പുച്ഛം മാത്രം
For Ramayana Part 2, I have three requests @malhotra_namit@niteshtiwari22@WorldOfRamayana 1.Explore Ravana lust, obsession with power and his darker, more disturbing personality in greater depth.
In 2019 Aditya Dhar released Uri Movie which showed us true realism
After that movie, no one could dare release a movie like Shaurya to defame our jawans
Similarly in 2026, he showed us the true face of Pakistan, no one could dare to produce a shitty, out of the touch propaganda movies like Bajrangi Bhaijaan after this
@N_varypen@shameontwiter@jsaideepak Unfortunately , i saw the movie clips nigga . I know exactly what i am talking about ! Every take is OG. How do you know i read it online ? Where is one READING it though ? As far as i know every one is watching it !
इशिका तनेजा का दीपावली पर लिब्रांडु और
दिया मिर्जा को मुंहतोड़ करारा जवाब
लाइव डिबेट में कांग्रेस प्रवक्ता पूजा त्रिपाठी की तो बोलती बंद की...अगर तुम्हे अपने संस्कृति का पता नहीं हे तो क्यों ज्ञान पेल रही हो ..?
नमन हे कट्टर शेरनी को 🔥👏
@shameontwiter@jsaideepak Yeah by showing that DEVAS enslaved asuras , asuras were MARGINALISED , Ravan was a messiah only fighting for his oppressed people ...... from CANNIBAL, SERIAL RAPIST to fearless warrior fighting against oppression ...... S U R E B R O !!
If the movie is what the reliable voices are saying it is & some are still endorsing it "as a movie",we could extend the same courtesy to movies like Haider, PK & Raavan. At least, their makers wore their intent on their sleeves. Subversion is worse than open confrontation.
This SUBHUMAN deserves to be CHOPPF_D and galvanized.
This lowlife does'nt deserves to live in HUMAN society !
Feel bad for HER and her CHILDREN !! She must've done a crime against humanity earlier to get this MF as companion .
It's normal in villages.
many women r tolerating disgusting creatures(husband)bcz thy hve no any othr choice,even thr parents don't care abt thm.
i hve seen many othr videos like ths. In the comment section ppl laugh n ignore bcz it's normal😐
Bt feminists r ruining family srrr🤡