@Truthcoin@DigitalGoldTalk@eCash "This is all a moot point, because XEC is going to $0, no matter what name I pick"Then why be so clingy to the name of something that 'looks so bad'? If your project is so good and strong, you wouldn't be so adamant about capturing the name; as a fellow respectful developer.
@Truthcoin@DigitalGoldTalk@eCash "6. Your unhinged defensive reaction ... is also proof that you have a dead project" By what logic is this proof? You are drawing false conclusions here, which isn't a good look for an 'expert'. A project is dead when development stops. Period.
@Truthcoin@DigitalGoldTalk@eCash "- I myself was not aware (and I am an internationally recognized cryptocurrency expert) that Amaury had changed the name of his BitcoinABC project, to XEC" > Well, this is exactly why it sounds lame. Either you are incompetent or you aren't telling the truth. Which one is it?
@VigilanteCrypto@caincurrency@eCash No he is right. No false claim here. If you try to use the eCash name to do questionable actions. You will always find opposition. Crypto should mature and reject projects with no value.
@specialenmity@anil_bharrat@Truthcoin If anything, rank #160 with eCash (XEC) technical stack is the most bullish possible signal for anyone who understands what they're looking at. It means the market hasn't priced it yet.
@mariusoffchain@deadalnix@CryptoastMedia@eCash Franchement c'est insultant... et complétement idiot de croire que quelqu'un utiliserait des bots pour faire 23 likes et 5 retweets. Peut être que ça se fait chez les influenceurs BTC ? La norme ailleurs ce n'est pas ça hein.
@Loic_Pandul D'accord sur le fork foireux de Sztorc. Mais traiter XEC de "shitcoin", c'est ignorant ou malhonnête. Un shitcoin, c'est quoi ? Un truc qui a renié son whitepaper et stagne depuis dix ans ? Si c'est ça la définition, cherche peut-être ailleurs que chez ceux qui innovent.
@Truthcoin@anil_bharrat Calling eCash a “nonentity” while ignoring its Avalanche consensus is either ignorance or bad faith. Market cap ranks don’t measure technical merit, and your “hyper‑sidechainization” theory hasn’t materialized. Dismissing real engineering as “low tier” is manipulative nonsense.
@Truthcoin If the name is generic,why did you specifically chose "eCash" with capital "C" and not "ecash". Is this an attempt to confuse people with the already existing fork eCash (XEC) ? Knowing your background, the probability of this beeing pure coincidence seems rather low to me.
@Ghostbanned7 @xnomafia @deadalnix@atxmj@MKjrstad Well, regarding "3 global round trips in 400ms" by @ColinLeMahieu, if "global" means around the earth, I'm a bit skeptical too. It seems light signals through optic cables (not in vacuum) propagate slower (~200ms), which would exceed 400ms for 3 trips.
@reduzio In my opinion, too many tools can be confusing. +it's best to keep godot size minimal + there are already good options outside godot. / But a sprite editor with specific game engine capabillities (e.g add script to pixels or pixel groups idk lol) could be fun and original.
@MarleneSchiappa@EmmanuelMacron Par contre parler de soi en bien vous connaissez...votre compte twitter ressemble à un texte hagiographique. Je sais que le melon est de saison, mais à consommer avec modération dans votre cas si je peux me permettre.