Ahora Claude Code puede leer documentaciones completas sin gastar un solo token.
Solo necesitas conectarlo a NotebookLM de Google vía MCP.
Aquí el tutorial de cómo hacerlo. ⬇️
@SamoMarec@HoranskyMartin Myslím, že keď sa človek pozrie von z veľkého mesta je jasne, čo ľudí trápi. Napríklad keď idete do takej Richňavy, hneď viete čo ľudí trápi.
@SamoMarec@HoranskyMartin Mna by ale zaujímalo o čo sa ľudia zaujímajú. Lebo podľa toho čo sa deje v tomto state by mal mať smer tak max 6,5%, ako najsilnejšia strana koalície. No oni stále vedu prieskumy
@BratBranko Poslite už tohoto ruského kokota dopiče a nech sa už nikdy nevráti z tej ruskej rite. A už ho boha stále nezdieľajte tu, každý len onanuje nad týmto prijebaným komunistickým čurákom.
This gets even uglier when you look at what happens after Palantir gets inside a system.
It is pure dependency engineering.
In Britain, MPs are now openly warning that Palantir is becoming ubiquitous across government, while the same regulator that hired it had already warned that heavy reliance on a small number of big tech firms creates systemic risk.
Read that again. Even while taking the deal, they are admitting the model itself is dangerous.
And the NHS angle is worse than many people realize. In Parliament,
MPs said that after more than £330m, the contract leaves the NHS with no software ownership, no IP, and no lasting know how.
The supplier keeps the rights. So the public pays, the private contractor learns, and the state stays stuck renting the machinery.
Now add the military side.
Palantir’s Maven platform is moving deeper into permanent Pentagon status, with a previous contract ceiling already raised to $1.3b and a separate Army enterprise agreement worth up to $10b.
During a recent Palantir event, a Pentagon official even demonstrated how Maven could be used for weapons targeting in the Middle East.
People keep pretending this is just “data software” while it is literally being normalized closer and closer to the kill chain.
And while all this is happening, Palantir’s CEO is out there defending the company’s surveillance tech as government sales surge.
Palantir U.S. government revenue jumped 66% in Q4 2025 to $570m. So no, this is not some edgy startup fighting the machine.
The machine is feeding it. Rapidly.
This is the warning people need to get through their skulls:
You are looking at an unelected operating layer for power.
And once the state gets addicted to that layer, good luck removing it before it starts deciding what a society is allowed to see, sort, flag, punish, and optimize.
And the Vance angle makes it even darker.
J.D. Vance is not some neutral bystander who just happens to be standing next to this machine.
He is a political product of Peter Thiel’s network.
Thiel hired him into Mithril.
Thiel backed his rise.
Thiel then poured $15 million into the super PAC that helped shove Vance through the Ohio Senate primary.
So when people act like Palantir and the current US power structure are separate worlds, they are lying to themselves.
The vice president came out of the same patronage ecosystem that built Palantir.
And this is no longer just about “defense tech.”
The US government is wiring itself around Palantir as infrastructure.
The Army collapsed about 75 separate contracts into 1 Palantir enterprise agreement for its future software and data needs.
DHS then opened a $1 billion blanket purchase agreement so agencies like ICE, CBP, TSA, FEMA, and Secret Service can buy Palantir faster and with less friction. That is not ordinary procurement. That is institutional lock in.
The military piece is worse still.
The Pentagon’s own budget documents already placed Maven Smart System and Army Vantage inside the data and application layer used to support the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs in giving decision support to the President, the National Security Council, and the Secretary of Defense.
Read that again.
Palantir linked systems are not sitting on the edge. They are moving into the bloodstream of top level state decision making.
Then add immigration.
So the same company orbit is now sitting across war planning, federal data integration, and deportation machinery, while one of the most powerful men in Washington rose through the patronage network of its chairman.
That should terrify people.
Because this is how democratic states rot in the digital age.
Not when 1 cartoon villain grabs a microphone.
When private software, private patronage, and public force merge so completely that nobody can tell where government ends and the contractor begins.
Mo Gawdat spent years inside the machine at Google X.
Now he is saying out loud what the economists will not.
Gawdat: “The very base of capitalism, which is labor arbitrage, to hire you for a dollar and then sell what you make for two, is going to disappear.”
That is not a prediction. That is a coroner’s report on a system that has not stopped breathing yet.
Capitalism was never about innovation. It was about one equation. Buy human time cheap. Sell the output high. Pocket the spread.
Every empire. Every fortune. Every supply chain on Earth was built on that margin.
AI just closed it to zero.
A humanoid robot now costs $9,000. It does not sleep. It does not negotiate. It does not quit. It runs every hour of every day at a quality ceiling no biological worker will ever touch.
When production costs fall to nearly nothing, the entire pricing structure of the global economy falls with it.
But here is what every CEO celebrating margin expansion has not thought through for five minutes.
Gawdat: “Even if you can have all of the productivity gains in the world, by firing people consistently, nobody’s able to buy what you’re making.”
That single sentence should end every strategy meeting on the planet.
Capitalism is a closed loop. You pay workers. Workers become consumers. Consumers buy products. Revenue funds the next payroll.
Cut the worker and you do not just eliminate a cost. You eliminate the customer.
Every company racing to automate headcount out of existence is quietly engineering the death of its own demand.
They are building the most efficient production systems in human history to sell to a population that no longer has income.
50% unemployment is not a recession. It is the demand side of the economy going permanently dark.
You cannot push infinite supply into zero purchasing power. The math does not care about your earnings call.
Gawdat: “Wealth is going to have very little meaning for most of us in a few years’ time.”
This is where it turns on the people who think they are winning.
If production approaches zero cost, scarcity begins to dissolve. And scarcity is the only reason money holds value in the first place.
The billionaire class is stockpiling a currency that is quietly losing its reason to exist.
Gawdat: “So the entire capitalist model has to be rethought.”
He is right. And nobody in power is doing the rethinking.
Every board meeting about efficiency is a conversation about dismantling the very economic engine that made the board meeting possible.
The question was never whether AI could produce enough.
It was whether capitalism could survive its own success.
The machine does not just replace the worker. It erases the consumer.
And a system that can produce everything but sell nothing is not an economy.
It is a machine that perfected itself into extinction.
A study by Microsoft and Carnegie Mellon reveals that AI makes you dumber.
Not metaphorically. Measurably. Clinically. With data.
319 workers. 936 real tasks. Every major profession surveyed. Published at CHI 2025 — the most prestigious academic conference on human-computer interaction.
The finding that should terrify you is buried in the abstract.
"Higher confidence in GenAI is associated with less critical thinking."
Every point of trust you place in AI is a point of thinking you stop doing yourself.
Here is what actually happened in the study.
Workers were asked to document every time they used AI at work — what they did, how confident they felt in the AI, and how much they engaged their own brain in the process.
The pattern was identical across every profession. Every industry. Every task type.
The more you trust AI, the less you think.
And here is the part that makes it worse.
The workers who trusted AI most also reported finishing tasks faster. They felt productive. They felt efficient. They had no idea the skill was draining out of them in real time.
The researchers put a name on what happens to your brain when you stop using it.
"Cognitive atrophy."
The same word doctors use for muscles that waste away when you stop moving. Your thinking ability deteriorates — silently, gradually — every time you let AI do the work instead.
The researchers quoted something that should be printed on every AI product ever shipped.
"A key irony of automation is that by mechanising routine tasks, you deprive the user of the routine opportunities to practice their judgement — leaving them atrophied and unprepared when the exceptions arise."
The exceptions are the only moments that actually matter.
The surgery that doesn't go as planned. The legal case with no precedent. The business decision nobody has faced before. The moment where there is no template and no prompt and no AI output to verify.
That is the moment your brain needs to work. And that is exactly the moment AI has been quietly training you to fail.
There is one more finding nobody is talking about.
Workers who relied on AI most didn't just think less. They produced more homogeneous outcomes. The same ideas. The same structures. The same solutions — because they all used the same prompts and accepted the same outputs.
Researchers called it "mechanized convergence." Entire teams cycling through variations of a single AI-generated concept, mistaking polish for originality.
AI is not making us more productive.
It is making us more identical. And less capable of noticing the difference.
Microsoft funded this study. The company that sells Copilot. The company investing $80 billion into AI. They paid researchers to find out what their own product does to your brain.
And the answer they got back was: it makes it weaker.
They published it anyway.
Source: Microsoft Research — "The Impact of Generative AI on Critical Thinking" · CHI 2025
There is a video circulating on the internet that is difficult to watch. A woman sits on a pavement in Louisville, Kentucky. She is wearing a hospital gown. It is 36 degrees outside. Her belongings, everything she apparently owns, are in a plastic bag on the concrete beside her. Behind her, through the glass doors she has just been escorted through, the hospital hums along as normal. The security guards who brought her here have already gone back inside.
She couldn’t afford her bill.
This is not a scene from a developing nation or a history book. This is the United States of America.
The country in which it happens has spent decades telling the rest of the world that it has the highest GDP on earth. Which is a bit like a restaurant proudly displaying its bill on the wall. Enormous number. Terrible meal. The lobster was frozen, the wine came from a box.
Europe, by comparison, has spent the better part of a century building something rather different. The food, for a start, is extraordinary. Not in a showy way, but in the way that a simple lunch in Lyon or a glass of wine on a terrace in Lisbon reminds you that eating is one of the genuinely good things about being alive. The wine is the wine that the rest of the world has spent generations attempting to replicate, mostly without success.
Roughly 35 percent of Europeans live with a chronic illness. In America, that number is 76 percent. The difference is not genetic. It is architectural. It is the slow accumulation of decent food, walkable cities, actual holidays, and a healthcare system that does not require you to crowdfund your own appendix.
Europeans work fewer hours. They have more purchasing power on a smaller salary once you subtract the cost of health insurance, medical debt, and the private school their child needs because the local public one has a metal detector at the entrance. They live, on average, about ten years longer. Not ten years of decline and doctor visits, but ten years of being a person in the world.
In the first quarter of 2025, the number of Americans leaving the United States doubled compared to the previous quarter.  Europe was their top destination. Not for a sabbatical or a gap year. Permanently. These are not people who failed. These are people who did the maths.
There is a man somewhere in America right now who has worked fifty-hour weeks for forty years, taken one week off when his employer permitted it, and will, statistically, be dead before he sees seventy. And there is another man, not very far away on a map but an entire civilisation removed in practice, sitting on a terrace in the afternoon sun with a glass of something cold and no particular place to be. He has had six weeks off every summer since 1987. He knows his neighbours by name.
The first man’s country has the higher GDP.
The first man’s country tops the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) index. The second man tops the Quality of Life Index (QLI). The better health. The longer life. The afternoon.
MAGA America calls that losing.
Ask anyone.
Gandalv / @Microinteracti1
@RadoslavPalka@AntonHrubon Pričom im témy ležia rovno pri nohách a oni sú neschopní ich zdvihnúť. Fico je len úbohá slubotechna, ktorú by priemerne schopný politik rozobral ako lego. Len opoziční politici nie sú ani len priemerne schopní, česť výnimkám.